busy day at work, only managed to take few glances alt tabbing at the thread and its really derailed to god knows wherever the shit flinging party train went.
anyways, lets make some replies!
QUOTE(flush @ Nov 13 2007, 10:06 AM)
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=11053758and as far as priest arena viability goes, rogue > priest. priest's arena viability is in fact, the lowest amongst all 9 classes, somemore you pit it against a rogue? which can take out people in mere seconds? provide ms style debuff? crippling? stun locking? 3-5k mutilate spamming on the priest i see how viable he can do while at the same time, being stunned
Added on November 13, 2007, 10:06 amdirect quote
wow lets see, when did BC started? and WHEN did arenas and the resilience started?
then check the date of the thread. now that we got those facts in, lets begin.
QUOTE
and as far as priest arena viability goes, rogue > priest. priest's arena viability is in fact, the lowest amongst all 9 classes, somemore you pit it against a rogue? which can take out people in mere seconds? provide ms style debuff? crippling? stun locking? 3-5k mutilate spamming on the priest i see how viable he can do while at the same time, being stunned
my own self quote again, notice from the post there isnt anywhere mentioning i would lol kick a priest out and replace with a rogue. im merely pointing the fact, given the date of the thread, that rogues are more viable than a priest in arenas. if you didnt knew, back in the days where people were RARELY goin over 100-200 resilience (health/stam is also in relation), rogue's burst dmg is still running wild and in 5v5's, priest are very commonly insta-gibbed. HELL, even this very day and age, priests are STILL capable of gettin insta-gibbed with 500 resilience and 11-12k unbuffed hp.
with the above said, its pretty obvious which class is more viable over another.
but hey, scroll up, and see the % of priest vs rogues. people still bring em anyways, with the main reasons of mass dispel/mana burns. teams can easily burst down frost mages or even counter paladin teams (and thats the dominating healer class at that point, and even to an extent this day and age) via mass dispel. so long the priest can break even that 1 immune and die off, hes already done his job and it wouldnt matter all too much. trading a paladin or maybe ice mage with a priest is quite a fair trade, especially if your priest manages to not get insta-gibbed right off the bat.
your quote:
QUOTE
Actually, I would think that priests are more viable in 5v5 arena BGs than rogues. Each 5v5 team will need both priest AND pally in it. A priest and pally can work well together to use an offensive dispel strategy as well as defensive dispel and cross dispel (dispelling each other if one of them is charmed, sheeped or cc-ed by some other form of dispelleable magic).
not even a part mentioning rogues will have a tough time in 5v5. only mentioning priests are more viable in arenas/bgs than rogues.
in which following would be my reply as quoted by you and again by me as above.
which is in disagreement with you because thats what happening as i mentioned above in this post, during that time period.
since we're on the memory lane.
lets look at the evolution of the priest class through out the ages since arena season 1 started, until today. compare priest with the other 3 kinds of healers. if you havent noticed, priests are the ONLY healer that goes CRAZY on stacking stam/resil, while the other healers are actually goin for mana pool, +healing, +regen or even to some extent crit over crazy focus of stamina/resilience. why do you think they do that? im sure you already know the answer, i mean, your the priest right?
and thus, i bring my own words up again:
QUOTE
i would REALLY want you to quote that from any of my posts made here in the WoW sub-forum, until then, your just vomiting those words out of no where. (and thats me being reeeeeaaally civil here) AFAIK i was the person that was claiming how rogues and hunters were horrible on 5v5's, so what ur saying here is totally against what i claimed and even till this very day i stand by this statement. patch 2.3 will be entirely changing this but till this day patch 2.3 is not out yet (tonight though!)
wheres the exact quote of me claiming:
"RGOUES MUTLATE FOR 3K PEWPEW! I WILL REPLAEC PRIESTS WITH ROUGES ANYTIME!"
and again, as said in bolded quoted texts, and as mentioned yourself, you also know that i was the one "supposedly QQ'ing" regarding rogues in arenas during recent times. check back that thread for me if you will, and look at the date. if im not mistaken, its already season2 where everyone is geared, and resilience is putting a dent to rogues and hunter's burst dmg capabilities. so, what was the issue here?
you're basically:
- vomitting out words outta god knows which part of your body is vomitting
- creating issues that werent issues in the first place
so yea, at the end of the day, im still going to:
- throw your own lines back at your face (because your STILL unable to make solid statement and claims)
- shoot you down for not pvping much and still going on about pvp (honestly, i could really give a rat's ass for you not pvp'ing much, but when ur gonna make so much rant about pvp'ing where your experience are somewhat limited, im going to really use that against you like it or not)
- think that because i pvp all the time, my thoughts are doctrine. (just like how ur standing by your raiding arguments, you cant change my thoughts, nor could i change yours, so if im gonna go by that my thoughts are the absolute universal law, you cant just come in gunz blazing and brain wash me now can you?)
Added on November 13, 2007, 7:56 pmQUOTE(EDK @ Nov 13 2007, 01:48 PM)
Alright genius, so a rogue who watch priest play knows every ins and outs of priest moreso than a priest player.
And yeah a rogue in arena have so much free time to watch his partner play instead of busy doing dps and focus to blind at the right time.
well, for one, i got a priest in my 8 man 5v5 arena roster, and as the team's leader and obviously manager of the team, i do watch him play, and even if im not free, i will have to make myself free, to ensure that he is playing at his best, what is his weakness, what is his advantage, and from there, wherether i like it or know, i will have to know a thing or 2 about priest.
the same goes for raiding too, and that job usually goes to the guild leader, or officers, or class leaders.
if you cant grasp that, perhaps your experience in end game be it pve or pvp is limited? or you've never knew the hardships of being in the leadership role and ur just either hopping on the epic bandwagon leeching epics?
and before you make rebutals, armory link please?
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:07 pmQUOTE([^-^]fumoffu @ Nov 13 2007, 02:04 PM)
for all i care
gnomes > all other races
lol wut? cant roll a gnome priest?
even if we can, racials doesnt mean much because it doesnt do sh*t ENUFF during high end pvp situations in BGs or Arenas. dude if u cant spam the damn button or have to wait MINUTES to use it again, it doesnt matter.
im not going to be an elitist jerk and put up comments like "owh i dun read other people posts with less than 2.3k rating or yell to people to link their armory or else stfu" but i've been there as in end game raids and fighting against the best pvp-ers.
both of u flush and mr Q have stated ur points. both of u are right AND wrong at the same time. who cares? we are talking about pvp here. its not like ur going to fight 1vs1. any kind of specs/class/combo/pair can do good. what matters most is UR SKILL. or gear for certain classes.
a good example is Bam, the gnome warr on Arthas. he tops the 2vs2,3vs3, and 5vs5 ratings. do u think he frets over escape artist?( which is nerfed in 2.3 btw). granted, most of the top teams have MS warrs in the thier ranks, but do racials do enuff to make a difference? NOPE
so moral of the story aka conclusion for the OP:
racials dunt do enuff for pvp (yes even wotf). if u think BGs and Arenas are too hard becoz of the gear gap, try world PVP.
racials can help during end game pve raids. its not like its going to matter a lot. dev plague+inner focus every 3m? its a dot. its not gonna crit. worry about the 1k mana cost+ the heals ur gonna get? dude seriyesly ur vt and ve covers much more. its not gonna matter much. heck any ally spirest can match ur dps with a similar gear. just learn to time ur sf and innervates.
im a spriest. i have spriests mains, alts AND twinks(eh that means i dun have a life). all classes do fine.
btw, who the hell owned arenas with a rogue nowdays? u r not refering to MING are u ? LoL
and thats why gnomes are getting nerfed on 2.3!!!
but yea,

actually its kinda the other way around, it does matter in high end pvp/pve situations. its just the non-high ends it doesnt matter at all. but maybe its just a matter of opinions in this

and actually the thread's bout some guy asking about race to pick as a priest, it just got awfully derailed

and op's into raiding yo.
and just FYI, I, as a ROGUE, leads and manages a rather decent arena team. while its not something entirely ownage, but compared to the people on LYN thus far, and the people on my realm during our GMT +8 timezone, we currently #1 in terms of ratings.
and thats just me, theres MANY other top rogues that are doing pretty damn good in arenas these days as the resilience impact over rogues are slowly fading away as gear scales for rogues much better compared to defense/healer classes as theres a resilience cap that blizzard currently have no plans to remove at the moment.
try to look up neilyo from warcraftmovies.com
and ming is semi-retired, hes just a casual player. theres many MANY rogues being much better than him, neilyo is one fine example, and that again, is just one rogue.
anyways you can refer to my thread in LYN, or my linkage of armory all over this forum. hell, ill make it easier for you:
http://www.wowarmory.com/character-sheet.x...ale&n=Quazacolt
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:10 pmQUOTE(EDK @ Nov 13 2007, 02:14 PM)
Hello mr ROGUE, for a starter can u level up a priest from level 1 to 70 first before u come here to post with all your falseful assumptions on how to play a priest? Till then just STFU when priest player posting sound advice here.
Go brag about ur pvp rating with your own post nub.
now now, in the first place ive never even posted on how to play a priest. last i check advises on racial dont really relate to "playing a priest 101"
and secondly as sets mentioned, you dont have to play a priest yourself to know things like:
priest can heal, priest can dispel, priest can fear for example
and third, maybe you should STFU instead? as your currently not contributing to the thread.
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:11 pmQUOTE([^-^]fumoffu @ Nov 13 2007, 02:40 PM)
i've played and lvled up all type of classes except for shammys and hunters. does that make me a genius regarding WoW?
no lol
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:17 pmQUOTE(EDK @ Nov 13 2007, 02:53 PM)
Priest is the only class with 2 racial, it counts when your opponent have 2 better racial than u. There's a reason blizz need to balance priest racial & give fear ward to all priest.
blood elf paladins, vs their alliance counterparts.
uh oh, failing the fact part of "Priest is the only class with 2 racial"
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:18 pmQUOTE(tales @ Nov 13 2007, 02:54 PM)
Sigh, the usual ego from wow players.
If someone achives something more than another, people call him 'no lifer'.
If someone achieves something less than another, people call him 'noob'.
There is no ending to this vicious cycle. Just play the game and enjoy it as it should be as it's just a GAME.
oh hell no it aint just a game, its a WORLD! of warcraft
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:27 pmQUOTE(EDK @ Nov 13 2007, 03:47 PM)
Bingo. U hit your own balls. The levelling lets u grab the basic and further pve/pvp play advance your skills n knowledge. How did some one without the priest basic as well as further play experience argue that his points hold more weight than priest player who been there and done that just because he pvp day in day out with his rogue and coz of his armory rating!?
Wow your warlock, rogue dps & circle of healing example is so in depth man, totally text book material. I am amazed by your knowledge.
Theorycraft more baby genius.
so now he somehow punched his own testicles. anyways!
yes, you are right that it does help you GRASP (grab isnt really the word here) the basics of a specific class.
but its also not a surprise when veteran players that know how to read english, know how to read tooltips, or even read forums learning and knowing the inside outs (things such as mechanics/formulas/spreadsheets calculations etc, hell, ill do you a favor, just go elitistjerks.com) of another class that he've never played 1-70 and he could still jump in and play that said class at a decent level and in due time, he could be just as good or even much better than a player that played the class from 1-70.
and since we're now talking about who holds more weight in an argument, and we've known beforehand that PVP and PVE is 2 worlds apart, what makes you think that a person playing a priest in pve, holds more point in a pvp argument over a person that does only pvp, even if he does not play a priest? (and lol i used to sometimes logon my friend's priest account which is also 70 to pvp/pve, if you even wanna count that)
and its BECAUSE of his armory rating he hold more weight in the argument. whatever ratings you are in arenas, or even pvp, knowing your opponents is as good as knowing half of the battle. if my opponent is a priest, i HAVE to know the priest class inside out, what he can do to me, what i can do to him and things like that. i mean, wow, is it really that hard to understand?
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:30 pmQUOTE(dishwasher @ Nov 13 2007, 05:36 PM)
And I've seen my fair share of Ebay-ers who have no freaking idea how to do what they are supposed to do. Hence the comment 'omg did you ebay your account? Suck less'.
Yes, you can learn a character at 70, and you can equally suck at it if you leveled from 1-70. It depends on the player. Is he wiling to read up on his class? Use consumables? Read boss strats? Or does he just tag along and drag his raid down? Really guys, don't just generalize, too many factors that makes a good player and bad one.
QFT
really just depends on the player. even an ebayer can kick ass in pve/pvp if hes good himself to begin with. (which is why i sometimes wonder on the ebay remark, even funnier when those said critisizers that got their face owned by the very ebayer they critisize.)
Added on November 13, 2007, 8:31 pmand to end this wall of text.
pie > cake.
This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Nov 13 2007, 08:31 PM