Okay, Can I say Time is sucks?
|
|
 Sep 28 2024, 01:20 AM, updated 2y ago
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020 
|
I bought a VPS in China with address 8.134.53.4
I found that accessing to vps is hard and slow, then tried ping with 61% packet loss under my TIME broadband in Penang Then my friend in KL with Maxis got only 10% packet loss when pinging this address. Any warm friend here can let me know your ISP and ping result? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 02:06 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
Junior Member
457 posts Joined: Mar 2020
|
Using TIME in KV - 0% packet loss
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 02:26 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020
|
QUOTE(AbbyCom @ Sep 28 2024, 02:06 AM) Using TIME in KV - 0% packet loss May I know you are using public IPv4 or private? TQ |
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 02:35 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
457 posts Joined: Mar 2020
|
QUOTE(obeykarma @ Sep 28 2024, 02:26 AM) May I know you are using public IPv4 or private? Wahlao you are correct in asking. I was using Cloudflare WARP when testing.TQ When I turn off WARP, then the packet losses are 75%. 
Moogle Stiltzkin liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 02:50 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,208 posts Joined: Aug 2018
|
Unifi
300 pings: CODE --- 8.134.53.4 ping statistics --- 300 packets transmitted, 300 received, 0% packet loss, time 299287ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.458/202.360/204.240/0.553 ms traceroute: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 02:58 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020
|
QUOTE(kwss @ Sep 28 2024, 02:50 AM) Unifi Thank you so much 300 pings: CODE --- 8.134.53.4 ping statistics --- 300 packets transmitted, 300 received, 0% packet loss, time 299287ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.458/202.360/204.240/0.553 ms traceroute: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Just curious does unifi provide public V4/v6? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 03:00 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,208 posts Joined: Aug 2018
|
QUOTE(obeykarma @ Sep 28 2024, 02:58 AM) Thank you so much All plans comes with one /64 public IPv6 prefixJust curious does unifi provide public V4/v6? 500 Mbps and above comes with one public IPv4 address Moogle Stiltzkin and obeykarma liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 08:10 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
2,613 posts Joined: Nov 2020 
|
QUOTE(obeykarma @ Sep 28 2024, 01:20 AM) I bought a VPS in China with address 8.134.53.4 This is unfortunately one of TIME's problems that has been there for a long timeI found that accessing to vps is hard and slow, then tried ping with 61% packet loss under my TIME broadband in Penang Then my friend in KL with Maxis got only 10% packet loss when pinging this address. Any warm friend here can let me know your ISP and ping result? Thanks! their connection to China is rather poor, slow speeds, high pings, high packet loss Here's my ping, 161.142.x.x ip range on TIME CODE ~$ ping 8.134.53.4 PING 8.134.53.4 (8.134.53.4) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=116 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=114 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=143 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=12 ttl=48 time=185 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=14 ttl=48 time=167 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=17 ttl=48 time=199 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=20 ttl=48 time=149 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=21 ttl=48 time=147 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=22 ttl=48 time=198 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=24 ttl=48 time=183 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=25 ttl=48 time=198 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=27 ttl=48 time=214 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=28 ttl=48 time=160 ms 64 bytes from 8.134.53.4: icmp_seq=31 ttl=48 time=216 ms ^C --- 8.134.53.4 ping statistics --- 31 packets transmitted, 14 received, 54.8387% packet loss, time 30339ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 113.516/170.611/216.165/32.494 ms This post has been edited by PRSXFENG: Sep 28 2024, 08:10 AM Moogle Stiltzkin liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 11:42 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
Junior Member
691 posts Joined: Nov 2021
|
Maxis Fibre.
1minute/60shots CODE --- 8.134.53.4 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 408.615/416.632/443.941 ms Latency seems to be worse than TM or TIME, but no packets lost at sea. How about IPv6 on TIME? I’m assuming the VPS provider also issued you an IPV6 address. This post has been edited by dev/numb: Sep 28 2024, 11:58 AM |
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 01:21 PM
|
|
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: May 2019
|
Pretty well known that TIME has shitty connection to China. The only one that’s decent is China Unicom, u can try with speedtest. Tailscale VPN back to MY from China with TIME, only when the ISP is China Unicom I can use it fine with decent speed. China Telecom is super slow. Moogle Stiltzkin liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 28 2024, 01:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020
|
QUOTE(dev/numb @ Sep 28 2024, 11:42 AM) Maxis Fibre. unluckily, my VPS provider only give ipv41minute/60shots CODE --- 8.134.53.4 ping statistics --- 60 packets transmitted, 60 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 408.615/416.632/443.941 ms Latency seems to be worse than TM or TIME, but no packets lost at sea. How about IPv6 on TIME? I’m assuming the VPS provider also issued you an IPV6 address. |
|
|
Sep 29 2024, 10:02 AM
|
Junior Member
184 posts Joined: Jun 2020 From: IPOH
|
QUOTE(AbbyCom @ Sep 28 2024, 02:35 AM) Wahlao you are correct in asking. I was using Cloudflare WARP when testing. Same result on Allo Technology/City Broadband.When I turn off WARP, then the packet losses are 75%.
|
|
|
Sep 29 2024, 01:06 PM
|
Senior Member
1,601 posts Joined: Jan 2016
|
 1st test using time with default dns 2nd test remote back to my house, maxis+nextdns |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 29 2024, 05:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#14
|
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020
|
QUOTE(QuantumEdge @ Sep 29 2024, 01:06 PM) 1st test using time with default dns 2nd test remote back to my house, maxis+nextdns |
|
|
Oct 3 2024, 10:39 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#15
|
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Feb 2020
|
UNIFI installed
like from ISDN to FTTH!!! |
|
|
Oct 3 2024, 10:43 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#16
|
Junior Member
683 posts Joined: Mar 2016
|
This is a well-known long story for TIME connection to China especially China Telecom China Unicom and China Mobile seems to be okay so far  https://smokeping-time.samsam123.name.my/sm...target=mainland AFAIK For China Telecom : The problem is actually on both CT and TIME side. CT only have 5Gbps bandwidth with NTT in Singapore and TIME uses NTT to route to China Telecom (mostly) which passed through Singapore which resulting an all-day 50-60% packet loss For IPV6 you would see the ping is lower but it's more worst because NTT and CT only have 1 / 2 Gbps bandwidth for IPV6 This post has been edited by Sam Leong: Oct 3 2024, 10:45 PM Moogle Stiltzkin, obeykarma, and 1 other liked this post
|
| Change to: |  0.0187sec
 1.55
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 12:01 AM |
Quote