Has anyone from opposition voiced out against this?

So they sokong this also?

So what difference would voting either side have made

Exactly, but the fella with the agenda keeps talking as if its a one side problem.

Issue started during Najib administration when they ordered MCMC to start censoring the internet.

Mahathir is the source of almost all problems we have here, but at least his stand against internet censorship was a boon. Pak Lah's administration also followed that.

Considering the opposition isn't talking about this, it means they aren't against it. Why would they be? They're confident of taking power next election and they'd love to wield this same power. This clown blamin voters for this as if voters had a choice, both also wanna do the same shit.

Not like he's promoting a third party who has a stand against this.

No actually I voted independent + MCA (adun / parliament).

Ask MCA liao but they buat diam only.

So since you voted for other side can you ask them their opinion also? So we all know who to vote for next time to reverse this?

Go see the candidate FB you will see my post unless they deleted it.

Now share what you have done other than talk shit here

Nope, can just say they're read the news since this is already reported.

But they won't do, because they support this move themselves.

So what @M4A1 is talking about is bullshit, and he knows it.

My location is displayed here, go sendiri cari.

But again, what about you share what you have done other than talk shit here

Talking as if there is an alternative but not providing the alternative

Anyway just because you ask, I will re-open my twitter and ask around there also. You want me to tag you also? Come give your twitter.

This post has been edited by RViN: Sep 6 2024, 01:14 PM

Lol you the one saying "you voted for this", that's not a criticism of the action that's a "two sides" argument. And talking about blaming others, who you blaming here? The voters not the doers ... not only not listening to yourself once but twice

That clearly implies voting a different way would have resulted in a different action - and everyone is saying it wouldn't have.
Exemplified by the fact that the other side have no issue against this.

You'd have an argument if the other side clearly said they wouldn't do this and criticise this move, then yeah, those who voted for this side ostensibly voted for this (that's another fallacy since they didn't exactly say they would do this before elections - but hey at least can link the two together).

Not sure why I'm bothering to explain this, you clearly can't get your two brain cells to link together for long enough to process this.

I dont contradict myself tho