Mangsa ialah seorang wanita yang rela.

This statement alone really fucuk the bm.

When you kena interrogated, zina suka sama suka also can change to kena rogol.

Actually you are right. I went to read the case. The lawyer is right that even the most evil accused should be given his right to appeal and apply for stay of execution. Maybe it's because the judge has been influenced by public opinion / media.
This kind of afterthought rape case is very common in the West lol. I understand why the lawyer is upset with this kind of practice being allowed and enforced in Malaysia.

(f) with her consent, when the consent is obtained by using his position of authority over her or because of professional relationship or other relationship of trust in relation to her

The prosecution said that based on the accused’s position and the testimonies of witnesses, Syed Shah Iqmal is a well-known preacher and a motivator who is highly regarded, but he used his position to take advantage of the victim.

The prosecution also demonstrated that the victim was vulnerable due to suffering from depression, which rendered her unable to make decisions and resist the accused, she said.

Abis lah next time, even with consent, you need to make sure everything is right before doing it.

Don't have the facts of the case nor am I really interested to read it.

How old is the victim and how did the 3 judges came to different conclusions about her? Did the 2nd and 3rd judges interviewed everyone again?

So no force was involved? Just prove he is buaya darat type?

Haha by reading the case I am referring to the "news". Didn't want to spend time reading the full case either.

Personally (big assumption) I think the defence team fked up really bad la plus a little bit of bias. This kind of case usually very hard to prove one if the defence managed to raise even a tiny bit of doubt.

More so since it has been 1 year and the fact that she only reported to the authorities after he declined to reciprocate.

I think he has a chance at appeal but usually the appellate courts won't disturb the finding of facts by the lower courts and will only rule on the issue of law because as the lawyer rightly pointed out, it's unfair for a different judge to decide on the facts without looking at the demeanour of the victim when she gives her version of the story.

so type M finally realises that there are too many rules in their lives and some are not so convenient to them

valid point, but, how to objectively evidence that it is a SUKA sama SUKA? how?

there is no way to do that without physical evidence

valid point, but, how to objectively evidence that it is a SUKA sama SUKA? how?

there is no way to do that without physical evidence

Unless got video proof, it is pretty much rape case depend on female testimony

its puzzling to me too.
if woman initially consent, dah puas, then allege rape. Howlar...not fair also

Dis one ayam agree

Should abandon feminism law

Yes, there are many rules and almost all rules are not convenient to those who refuse to obey. There are do's and don't.

Abis lah next time, even with consent, you need to make sure everything is right before doing it.

I think so. But I could be wrong

Sekian. Sila bersurai secara aman dan teratur.

Yes you are wrong. They are still husband and wife.