DBKL qualified or not? There is a big difference between geotechnical study and geological assessment.

Former is to design foundation/piling, which I am sure is already being done. Unless they saying buildings have been designed without any geotechnical surveys, then heads need to roll. 

Latter is to see if any anomalies and ground water issues underneath and nearby. This is what identifies risks like the one we just had.

Ok thanks, if that is how it is done here, then great. Then why is DBKL making it sound like a new requirement? Maybe not everyone includes the geological study part in the report, I suppose. They need to be very specific on what they want, or else same old, same old..

lets just hope deep foundations building like TRX, merdeka 118 and klcc all got

but anyway I suspect this area related to KL river of life project which has been delayed ten years already. very old area, and swift river bank nearby.

Malaysia’s ambitious River of Life project struggles to meet deadline despite $1.2 billion spent