QUOTE(mindkiller6610 @ Dec 15 2007, 09:46 AM)
Color and exposure is good. But need to work on composition.You wanted to get everything sharp or some areas blurred?
Nikon D40/D40X Thread V2
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 09:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2008, 12:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ebernie @ Jan 22 2008, 12:29 AM) Oh my, looks blue-ish on my screen here. Well, for best results I would recommend buying a hardware calibration device like Colorvision Spyder 2 which uses a usb calorimeter to evaluate the colors on your screen and replaces your computer's default color profile.Any idea how I can calibrate my LCD? I'm betting it's because of the temperature or something. I've also uploaded a bunch of photos. I did some post processing and kept in mind about the WB so I adjusted until I toned down the yellow completely. Do the edited pics look better? ![]() Flickr page My photos used to be underexposed and cool, now after calibration, photos are exposed correctly and warmer. |
|
|
Feb 2 2008, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(knightrazor @ Feb 2 2008, 01:06 AM) Nope. And also not all lens will work with the adapter. |
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 07:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 10 2008, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2008, 11:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(xandman @ Apr 22 2008, 11:46 AM) on an aps-c...the only lense from the trinity that is worth having....is the 70-200 VR... Hey, actually if you mount FX lenses to a DX camera what will happen? I just realized I don't know the answer to this...the other 2 is more towards FF...but if u have the $$$...by all means...go ahead! |
|
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
[quote=xandman,Apr 22 2008, 11:58 AM]
nothing... juz that the effective focal length will be multiplied by 1.5... so a 24-70 is effectively 36-105 on dx cam... Added on April 22, 2008, 12:00 pm or did u mean...dx lenses on fx body? if thats wat u mean... then the answer would be... u'd get vignetting effect in most of ur shots... bcoz the image circle craeated by dx lenses is much smaller...can couldnt cover the ff sensor... [/quote] [quote=szyap,Apr 22 2008, 12:15 PM] [quote=xandman,Apr 22 2008, 11:58 AM] nothing... juz that the effective focal length will be multiplied by 1.5... so a 24-70 is effectively 36-105 on dx cam... Added on April 22, 2008, 12:00 pm i think u tat's d answer... [/quote] Yeah, FX on DX.... ahh... so noob lar me... Always hear about focal length multipliers and DX crop... Donno how it works. That's what I get being in a world of DX lenses only... :-p Thanks guys. |
|
|
Apr 22 2008, 11:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,261 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0193sec
1.14
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 06:57 PM |