QUOTE(yehlai @ Aug 17 2024, 10:23 PM)
huaweiCancel your pixel 9 order now!‼️, Tensor G4 sux. Not surprising at all
Cancel your pixel 9 order now!‼️, Tensor G4 sux. Not surprising at all
|
|
Aug 17 2024, 10:28 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,403 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Aug 17 2024, 11:48 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,403 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2024, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,403 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(killerjeya @ Aug 17 2024, 10:47 PM) Full context: jikenz wingz TS clickbait title fake misleading OP quote out of context Firstly, we do not know the ambient temperature in which the Pixel 9 Pro XL was tested in, as that has a major effect on the chipset’s ability to prevent thermal throttling for as long as possible. Additionally, we reported a while back that even MediaTek’s Dimensity 9300, a chipset fabricated on TSMC’s 4nm N4P process, lost 46 percent of its maximum performance when running the same stress test on the Vivo X100, which is also equipped with a vapor chamber. These results indicate that the stress test is designed to bring smartphone SoCs to their knees, so it is highly possible that even the most power-efficient silicon would struggle against this application. Hopefully, in other tests, the Tensor G4 does not deliver such a poor showing and actually proves that the Pixel 9 Pro XL is worth its flagship-level price. knn kena tipu by TS cb ktard so suka open trash thread with fake news |
| Change to: | 0.0160sec
0.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:48 PM |