Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Incel should be classified as a disability, not myth | proposal of framework

views
     
killdavid
post Jul 17 2024, 11:51 AM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



Wah TS way of thinking really like those western strawberries.
Good way to dig yourself into depression. You think life is about sex and relationships ?
Reality check for you: in order to get your sex, there is a price to be paid, either by money or with effort and suppressing your pride.
killdavid
post Jul 17 2024, 01:24 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(9m2w @ Jul 17 2024, 12:04 PM)
It's like hey I can't become kobe bryant

Let me walllow in self pity behind the screen wasting my life away
*
If that was true it would have been simple.
Here the fault is later pinned on the parents for giving birth to him, not giving him good genes or wealth. Bringing him to suffer in this world.
And angry at the world for being unfair and angry at women for not appreciating the main character of this story.

killdavid
post Jul 18 2024, 05:19 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(somewhataut @ Jul 17 2024, 02:08 PM)
i didn’t say life is about sex and relationship, I’m saying romantic gratification should become human right and those denied access should be deemed disabled and receive palliative care because they are living below human right set point.

Incels don’t call themselves incel after asking for romantic gratification by screaming gimme love gimme gimme and rejected. It’s the long term ineffective attempt to resolve the patterns in rejections, timeline that indicates permanent singleness as well as low elo score or poor dating apps performance that are pretty good symptoms of being an incel
*
Dude, let what I am about to say sink in.

You consider yourself an incel because no opposite sex individual gave you romantic gratification. To say it is your basic right means someone and some enforcing body needs to ensure you get romantic gratification. That would mean SOMEONE is FORCED to GIVE you romantic gratification to satisfy your needs.

How authoritarian is that ?


killdavid
post Jul 18 2024, 05:43 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(somewhataut @ Jul 18 2024, 05:40 PM)
This is a common notion used to slander incels

Did you read my 3.2? Which part of it imply holding women at gunpoint to give us romantic gratification?

Analogies:
Freedom to walk is a basic right, immobile oku can’t walk, society can’t make them walk thus offer OTHER FORMS of support, such as convenience parking spot, bigger spaces

Access to job opportunities is a basic right, autistic people can’t meet expectation of social competence in typical workplace, society can’t make autistic people competent socially thus offer OTHER FORMS of support, such as specialised workplace where the neuro atypical can adapt to.

Romantic gratification is a basic right, incels can’t get any, society CANNOT GIVE them romantic gratification but can offer OTHER FORMS of support, such as a special working environment where the the incels are not subjected to the same stress level, or substitute romantic gratification with access to certain drugs and recreation activities
*
Doesn't sound right either.
Just go pickup online gaming. You will lose interest in romance eventually
killdavid
post Jul 18 2024, 09:35 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(somewhataut @ Jul 18 2024, 07:20 PM)
I respect this insult, it better than the other ones

But It’s not a rant, it’s my hobby to write thought provoking articles, if I can choose any job I would become a socioeconomic journalist or researchers. I’m as puzzled as Jordan Peterson about how society attacks those appear to be ‘allies’ of incels, as if human society is a collective hive mind wired to reject toxins, it’s fascinating

I do go out with women

I’m pretty strategic with allocating resources in mate-seeking. So far the most significant investment I made were an expensive car, dating courses, dating agencies, the money went in vain
*
Please don't put yourself on the same sentence as Jordan Peterson. I will not have you soil his name.
Maybe you are a try hard. Who are you trying to impress here with your so called intellectual arguments. If you're gonna speak like that on dates, your romantic chances are zero.

You remind me of a ktard called thedannyguy.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0202sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 02:47 AM