QUOTE(GoodMorning @ Nov 3 2007, 10:45 AM)
Hi wish to ask Pro opinion here about upgrading lenses, you think is better to buy lenses seperately such as 70-300 and 18-55, 50mm prime ( around RM900 ) or buy a Sigma/tamron 18-200mm ( around RM1700 ) lenses that cover all the range without changing the lenses? am more to shooting an event and personally think Sigma 18-200MM OS would help alot, am also thinking tamron 18-250 that have a bigger range, but after looking at the picture am taken, fell that OS will help alot.. Please advice...
if u're looking for something convenient, then the 18-200 would serve the purpose, but bear in mind that these high zoom lenses(usually from wide angle to tele) would also suffer from greater barrel distortion when u're shooting @ wide angle, and also these lenses usually have smaller aperture for example, the 18-200mm would have f6.3 @ 200mm whereas the normal 70-300 would only be around f5 @ 200mm, and when u extend fully to 300mm, the aperture would only be f5.6 which is still wider than the 18-200mm.
Having OS/IS would help to compensate shaky hands, but would not be able to freeze the movements of your subject(small aperture, slow shutter speed), so OS/IS would only be useful if the object that u shoot is static in low light condition. for event coverage, u'll still need wide aperture to shoot properly in low light.
of course if u can afford, wide aperture + stabilizer would be the best..

p/s: i'm not a pro. just a another newbie..
This post has been edited by kevin613: Nov 3 2007, 12:37 PM