Reason given tyre botak. Ask owner sendiri tanggung



Accident back in April near Woodlands

The spot so near charging port...

The repair gonna cost bunch.. almost 60 70% maybe due the proximity to battery line

Kekwa
Noobfuck if never drove rwd, drive slow slow la.
Ni mesti gatal disable traction control.

This post has been edited by cursetheroad01: Jun 19 2024, 07:06 PM

Adjuster never see performance tyre b4 so say is tayar botak lol

he ain't even speeding also can spin out?
furthermore that car has traction control

conlanfirm linglong tires

already say there tyre botak dy

oh sorry, i rabun

probably billionaire.
1 out of 20 car.

simple reason only

the only repair is to total loss it

the repair cost itself is almost 60-70% of the car

my taycan front lip hit a sibeh high road bump, the radiator is behind the flaps... they quote me 25k to replace a new one... i sibeh hot liao.. go outside do touch up less than 2k...

lowyat CN

p zero = linglong?

Rwd memang easy drift

that easy to reject claim? after this is what? service not follow schedule will reject claim? cant present service record will reject claim?

can afford taycan takkan cant afford repair.

owai

semi-slick tyres?
track racing tyres?

that's why ppl say don't fall into scams

take money from u anything can

when u ask for money, everything cannot

Kek...
Murikok com...
Gudluck

dry road sure no problem

when wet hailat lo

never watch formula 1

You can say he's liberated.

I give you more mind boggling theory. That is not a Taycan, but is a SU7. Same color as the first one that crashed brand new.

by rejecting the claim, next car onward will have no insurance at all

and don't buy from unreputable insurance company like liberty
people buy from liberty all because it's cheap...that's the only reason

This post has been edited by MR_alien: Jun 19 2024, 07:43 PM

Sohaibeng giving half truths or what 7 kok shit? Tok so much wanna complain insurance penipu scammer, why cover up so many details? Assuming that $535 and $135 are for pairs of tyres, why the fuck is there $135/pc tyre on such expensive car? Surely some kind of used shit not suitable for this car that the adjuster has picked up on.

Sohaibeng acting like wumaos wanna cheap out for whatever reason but then cry father mother with half truths once shit hits the fan.

michelin ps4s?

so shitty in rain?

Became taycan't liao

Janji whitebutt nice to lick.....

Insurance came along from Eurokars where the Taycan was brought from

yes i know but customer should have the right to choose what insurance company they choose to buy from
if being forced to take liberty thn that's a red flag already

my ex-company, they will only use liberty if customer requested because have bad experience with it...they usually offer allianz 1st
a car dealer usually have connection with all the insurance companies that customer can choose

Biasalah insurance. Biggest scam industry

Cant blame them totally also

Becuz alot of douchebag ah beng drive luxury car and crash it 2 years later.. insurance company kena sampai takut also

Insurance many exception one

Yes bro, still skid

now i also changed to pirelli pzero mo

Generally insurance don't repudiate claim due to botak tyre

The only clause they can invoke is not roadworthy condition

Very hard to proof not roadworthy

And to be honest, claims handler don't like to repudiate claim

It takes 10 times more effort to repudiate a claim then approving one

Plus each insurance company has no more then 2 people have the authority to repudiate claim

My point is, the car owner is hiding a lot of information

Each repudiation comes with an extensive email explain the reason of repudiation and proof to substantiate their stand

This post has been edited by loui: Jun 19 2024, 09:30 PM

That's the point if insurance. If they crash means it's an accident. You think the fella want to crash the car on purpose? Then that is the insurance burden to prove it. Else it will open flood gate for other insurance to simply say you purposely crash without evidence.

There's why some people who keep claim will have no ncb and even higher premium. That's the purpose of insurance to insure.

Agreed. Liberty Insurance must have some valid reasons to reject the claim. Lets see what reason Liberty Insurance will come out in defense.

The guy was holding tire workshop receipt
2 x $535
2 x $135
$60

A bit cheap for $135 tire. Probably used??

This post has been edited by knwong: Jun 19 2024, 09:51 PM

I bet they have explained their reason to insured.

It is a regulatory requirement

All the owner need to do is just show the audience the letter to see whether the reason given is reasonable

Claim insurance

Is singkie insurance

Never heard insurance company in msia deny claim before

Mine is from Liberty Insurance also (now under AmAssurance)…don’t feel good now

f ayam under liberty too

The insurance buy from the official dealer, which liberty is the underwriter.

Not like the owner can choose also

actually can
customer has the right to choose which insurer they want

if being forced to take liberty, that's a red flag already

car dealer won't tie themselves with 1 company, instead has connection with all of them/multiple of them
a car dealer always recommend using 1 is because the commission rate is better

Which insurance is the best then?

Expect the owner to retract this post very soon. LOD would definitely follow suit.

Insurance can reject because changed third party tyre.

Shhh dont let ppl know.


Anyway i know a case richfag totaled sportcar coz racing but still can claim coz the owner has alot of business insurance. Simply say if rejected claim they will bring theie business to other company next renewal.

Biasalah moral hazard. Biggest spin off pusing in the industry

This post has been edited by jojolicia: Jun 20 2024, 08:13 AM

the weakest link is always the nut holding the steering wheel

no replacement for stupidity

Tyre is tyre. Does not make any difference what brand and which shop owner buy from.

If not later will say need to go pump official petrol brand?

Pirelli also very lousy meh?

I don't understand. Not fast also. The front tayar abit botak.
The car is 1.5yo have to change tayar? Why owner never show mileage?

How can pusing like that. The road not that wet also

.
In the 1st video, the victim said he changed the 2 front tyres (not all 4 tyres) about 2 months before the accident = likely the receipt of 2 X RM535 is for the 2 front tyres.
....... Why would a T20 Porsche Taycan EV owner buy a pair of RM135 tyres.?

AFAIK, Liberty Insurance has a bad reputation among drivers/riders wrt claims.
.

tayar botak more expensive

but when they fulfil claim, they must post on FB as if they have done something great. lmao.

i cannot stand agents feeling great everytime they compensate people, like they are doing us a favor...