It is clear after taking into account the above, Malaysia actually stands to profit from 1MDB - not loss.

Which part you don't agree with and want me to prove? Just state it.

Oh... really?

This is not what Nga and Anwar said.

Anwar said after a decade of development, TRX symbolises Malaysia's aspirations to create a leading global financial district, supporting its ambition to compete on the world stage.

Anwar added the Tun Razak Exchange is a step forward in the long and proud narrative of Malaysia, reflecting the country's rich history as a trading nation.

"Already, TRX is home to major financial players. "Today's launch of TRX also represents a milestone forward in the government's mission to renew the country's economic and financial architecture through the Madani Economy," he noted.

"With over 30,000 employees, including 20,000 knowledge workers, TRX has become a bustling business hub expected to drive economic growth and innovation while creating job opportunities."
https://www.nst.com.my/business/economy/202...nces-incentives

So you are saying that TRX doesn't benefit the country or that 1MDB doesn't profit from the TRX project?

Here is definitive proof PN better educated than PH.

PH says Lynas is a nuclear plant.
PN says it is not a nuclear plant.

So which one has attended secondary school science class?

You heard of Mr Google?

Malaysia went insolvent due to BNM scandals. You know what does the word "insolvent" means? So how much is your master paying you to deny BNM scandal ever happened?
The Edge Malaysia
Bank Negara 'basically insolvent' in 1993/94 after forex .
https://theedgemalaysia.com › article › bank-negara-bas...
30 Aug 2017 — PUTRAJAYA (Aug 30): Bank Negara Malaysia was "basically insolvent" in the early 1990s after suffering losses from foreign exchange trading, ...