QUOTE(Police4896 @ May 28 2024, 03:01 PM)
no...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need-blind_admission
it just means they dont take into account whether you need money or not when giving you an offer, does not care how u get the money to go.
being a private school student myself, my experience is that the only better part is better english education, nothing else. but i concede that it is a cheap private school.
and you should know, that for uk universities, none of the things you mentioned are relevant. only the mighty usa cares about those things, because the americans are too stupid to study. even oxbridge only require extra admissions exam and interview, while other top unis require extra admissions exam only for computer science. all the other ones look at only grades. so in the case of uk, smk, uec, international, no difference except for english level.
one thing - rankings are irrelevant, just look at their methodology. inside you will find a lot of questionable things. 30% of the rankings is based on reputation - which skews it to old established unis, which are all in the usa and uk. qs even puts 5% weight for "sustainability". and another problem with the methodology, this one to do with citations, is that they heavily favor schools offering large number of subjects and focused on stem. ever wondered why london school of economics ranking is so low despite being famous? and they also favor schools with large amounts of international students, since the rankings is primarily aimed at informing internationals, of course they would skew it to schools that actually accept them. ever wondered why dont any iits show up there?
to the most important part. to my knowledge, most students do not end up in ivy league, their quotas for international students are too low. they mostly end up in no name universities there. i had 2 classmates from international school that go this route. so wheres your point about going to "better" schools when 90% of them end up in shitty schools? like i said, asian unis in reality are not any worse than western ones - so those from uec and spm, the percentage of students going to "good" schools isnt actually any worse.
so at the end of the day. international schools are only good for planting banana, not for making good student.
Did you go private local or did you go private international?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need-blind_admission
it just means they dont take into account whether you need money or not when giving you an offer, does not care how u get the money to go.
being a private school student myself, my experience is that the only better part is better english education, nothing else. but i concede that it is a cheap private school.
and you should know, that for uk universities, none of the things you mentioned are relevant. only the mighty usa cares about those things, because the americans are too stupid to study. even oxbridge only require extra admissions exam and interview, while other top unis require extra admissions exam only for computer science. all the other ones look at only grades. so in the case of uk, smk, uec, international, no difference except for english level.
one thing - rankings are irrelevant, just look at their methodology. inside you will find a lot of questionable things. 30% of the rankings is based on reputation - which skews it to old established unis, which are all in the usa and uk. qs even puts 5% weight for "sustainability". and another problem with the methodology, this one to do with citations, is that they heavily favor schools offering large number of subjects and focused on stem. ever wondered why london school of economics ranking is so low despite being famous? and they also favor schools with large amounts of international students, since the rankings is primarily aimed at informing internationals, of course they would skew it to schools that actually accept them. ever wondered why dont any iits show up there?
to the most important part. to my knowledge, most students do not end up in ivy league, their quotas for international students are too low. they mostly end up in no name universities there. i had 2 classmates from international school that go this route. so wheres your point about going to "better" schools when 90% of them end up in shitty schools? like i said, asian unis in reality are not any worse than western ones - so those from uec and spm, the percentage of students going to "good" schools isnt actually any worse.
so at the end of the day. international schools are only good for planting banana, not for making good student.
Well my cousin received a full ride scholarship to a very reputable Ivy League, and she's from SMK. AFAIK most Ivy Leagues are extremely generous with financial aids, especially Harvard. I'm pretty sure this is very well known.
I don't know what you mean by "shitty" schools. Most students in in any school don't end up in Ivy League. There's plenty of very good schools equal or better or almost as good. On top of my head - UCB, UCLA, UChicago, CMU, MIT, Stanford, UW, UMich, UT Austin, NYU, GATech, Duke, JHU. There's more obviously (I only named the US ones). Any of these schools are top-notch schools and they are by no means easy to enter (program dependent of course).
The average Asian universities are equal? Probably yeah. But you're not going to convince me the top Asian schools are as good as the top ones in UK and US.
Anyway, most private school students don't go to US, so I highly doubt you'll find a lot of them going to Ivy Leagues anyway. Most people are not going to study for SATs (or ACTs) regardless.
I still hold my opinion private schools prepare you way better to enter top UK/US schools, and no I'm not talking solely from cultural perspective.
I should also add in another point that is potentially irrelevant. Plenty of MARA students both in UK and US including in the top schools. Whether you believe me or not is up to you, but my personal observation is this - those that actually was able to make full use of their education and actually get a good career going have almost always come from international school students. Solely speaking from their career head start or achievements (not daddy dependent kind of career) on those who studied overseas, International school students > SMK > SMJK > MARA (from what I've noticed at least). I should also add on JPA scholars have always seemed to underperform relatively to international school students. Again, I'm solely talking about their career. This is entirely anecdotal, so it's up to you to believe.
PS - calling Americans too stupid to study is kinda wild lmao. American education has always been holistic based. Has nothing to do with "too stupid to study". That's how it has been for a very long time. After all, the Ivy League is literally a sports league. You know going to universities is more than just studying right? lol
This post has been edited by trojandude: May 28 2024, 03:49 PM
May 28 2024, 03:33 PM

Quote
0.0219sec
0.92
5 queries
GZIP Disabled