Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Country Heights Grower Scheme (CHGS), anyone heard before?

views
     
FALSEALIAS
post Sep 1 2012, 10:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(catzz @ Aug 21 2012, 08:56 PM)
Wish to let go at RM8,800 for 1 (one) lot valed at RM8,000 (Grower's Fee / face value). Ownership transfer to be carried out at Country Heights' office at Sri Kembangan. Interested pls PM me.
*
WHO COVER TRANSFER FEE?
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 11:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(kinwing @ Jan 23 2013, 11:01 AM)
Anyway, I feel the manager is not doing his job in protecting the interest of minoirty shareholders and give the promised yield of 8% to 12% as promised.

If the company terminate earlier and only returning our capital in 2 years later, most probably the company has breached the agreement of giving a guaranteed YTM of 8% to 12%, so we could sue the company on this basis.

Or we could just fire the manager and run the company by ourselves since the company has planted palm oil for almsot 5 years and I think it's time for us to ripe off the benefit from mature of palm oil yield by ourselves.

No way they can kick us out by getting cheap fund from us and sharing their risk to us in the initial stage and now try to kick us out when time to ripe fruits without sharing the return back to minority shareholders. A typical situation head you win, tail we lose!!!
*
AGREED.

WTH IS THE MAJORITY HERE ACTING LIKE COWARDS? ALREADY TALKIN BS BOUT NOT GETTIN FULL AMOUNT & OTHER CRAP. GROW THE HELL UP & ACT MATURED.

- CHGS OWES US OUR 12% FOR THIS YEAR! THEIR MISMANAGEMENT IS OF THEIR OWN DOING. GLOBAL TRENDS SHOWED CONTINUED STRONG GROWTH FOR PALM OIL INTERESTS.
- EVERYONE SHOULD GET THEIR THEIR FULL CAPITAL REIMBURSED (IF IT COMES TO THAT) AND DEFINITELY XTRA COMPENSATION FOR EARLY TERMINATION. & NO STAGGERED LATE PAYMENT NONSENSE. 1 YEAR MAX.
- QUIT WORRYING BOUT STUPID BS LIKE NOT GETTIN FULL $ BACK, ETC. THAT WHY THERE'S A TRUSTEE.

DONT GIVE IN TO THE VOLUNTARY TERMINATION BS. LET/FORCE TRUSTEE TO APPOINT (QUALIFIED) INTERIM MANAGEMENT TO OVERSEE OPERATIONS & MAKE THIS A VIABLE SCHEME AGAIN. CHGS OBVIOUSLY NOT UP TO THE TASK & SHUD BE FORCED TO RELINQUISH TASK TO THOSE BETTER ABLE TO HANDLE IT.

WE MIGHT TAKE A SHORT TERM HIT, BUT SO WHAT... TELL CHGS TO FUK OFF NOW & WE CAN TRY TO IMPROVE THING WID NEW MANAGEMENT. THIS TIME WE'LL ENSURE NEW MANAGEMENT HAS GOT LIQUIFIABLE ASSETS TO ACT AS COLLATERAL IN CASE THINGS GET IFFY. WORSE COME TO WORSE - WE STILL HAVE LAND IN OUR NAME RIGHT? THAT IS ALWAYS A GOOD THING - FRUIT ORCHARD, CHICKEN FARM, ETC.

CHGS IS TRYING TO CREATE PANIC & GET PPL TO RELINQUISH LAND - SIMPLY COZ THEY WANNA ENJOY HUGE PROFITS BY BEING THE SOLE STAKEHOLDER.

SO, WAKE THE HELL UP, PPL. OUR INITIAL FUNDING HAS DONE ITS JOB - NOW TIME TO RIDE OUT THE STORM & ENJOY THE REWARDS. ONLY PIGS RUSH FOR SCRAPS.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 11:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(kinwing @ Jan 23 2013, 11:26 AM)
Yes we will vote against!
*
GOOD FOR YOU.

OTHER THINGS TO BE CONSIDERED.

- HAVE THEM POSTPONE AGM TILL LATER DATE & BETTER TIME (10 AM... WTF?!)
- IF AGM CANT BE POSTPONED, HAVE IT STREAMED LIVE ON YOUTUBE - NO EXCUSE! JUST NEED LAPTOP WID WEBCAM & WIFI... HOW THE HELL IS THAT HARD TO GET...?

- EITHER WAY, THERE NEEDS TO BE A VIDEO RECORD OF THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS.

MORE TO COME.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 12:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(Drmalvin @ Jan 23 2013, 11:56 AM)
Die die die lo. I really thought this investment was safe and good. Now another headache we have.
*
THE INVESTMENT IS ACTUALLY DECENT. JUST THE CHGS MANAGEMENT SUDDENLY GOT GREEDY & STUPID. THEY GOTTA GO.

I RATHER OWN THE LAND THAN RELINQUISH IT UNDER SUCH BS TERMS... IF ITS EVEN TRUE IN THE FIRST PLACE THAT THEY'RE FACING PROBS.

ANYWAY,

IF THEY ARE > APPOINT NEW MANAGEMENT. WE SUFFER A BIT TILL IT GETS GOOD AGAIN. ALSO, TAKE CHGS TO COURT FOR EARLY TERMINATION, CBT, CRIMINAL MISMANAGEMENT, ETC. AT THE VERY LEAST, TARNISH THEIR REPUTATION SAVAGELY. NO ELSE WILL FALL FOR THEIR FUTURE BS AGAIN.

IF THEY ARENT > THEN REALLY DESERVED TO BE TAKEN INTO COURT FOR WILFUL & FRAUDULENT MANIPULATION OF FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE RECORDS WITH THE AIM OF FINANCIAL GAIN.




FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 01:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(FALSEALIAS @ Jan 23 2013, 11:56 AM)
GOOD FOR YOU.

OTHER THINGS TO BE CONSIDERED.

- HAVE THEM POSTPONE AGM TILL LATER DATE & BETTER TIME (10 AM... WTF?!)
- IF AGM CANT BE POSTPONED, HAVE IT STREAMED LIVE ON YOUTUBE - NO EXCUSE! JUST NEED LAPTOP WID WEBCAM & WIFI... HOW THE HELL IS THAT HARD TO GET...?

- EITHER WAY, THERE NEEDS TO BE A VIDEO RECORD OF THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS.

MORE TO COME.
*
TO SETTLE THIS ISSUE ONCE & FOR ALL, BELOW IS THE EXCERPT FROM THE EMAIL BY MY AGENT. IT CLEARLY SAYS "FULL REIMBURSEMENT". SO PLEASE STOP POSTING NONSENSE ABOUT 'NOT RECOVERING FULL CAPITAL, ETC'. THATS ALL JUST BS... SO JUST STOP IT. BOTTOMLINE, WE'RE ALL GETTING FULL REIMBURSEMENTS.

ALSO, KEEP READING THE BELOW IN FULL TO SEE MY AGENT'S POV. I FOUNT THE PART BOUT 'vote AGAINST the proposed resolution, till it is changed to FULL CASH REFUND of our Capital within 30 days or according to period stipulated in the contract.' VERY INTERESTING. THIS MEANS ITS IN CHGS CONTRACT THAT WE MUST BE REFUNDED FULL AMOUNT WITHIN 30 days or according to period stipulated(?). GOOD TO KNOW!... WONDER WHEN IS THE STIPULATED PERIOD THOUGH > THATS ANOTHER GREAT POINT TO BE TAKEN UP AT THE MEETING!

"Dear Valued Investors,

It's sad to know that, CHGS is proposing voluntary termination of the scheme, meaning they will be refunding the full growers fee, whereby 10% will be paid within 30 days and the remaining within 2 years. They will be calling for a meeting for all growers on 8th Feb at 10am at the Mines Resort City's Convention Centre.

CHGS HQ had sent out the Circular for Volunteer Termination letter with a proxy form (as attached) ,it is important that all of us vote AGAINST the proposed resolution, till it is changed to FULL CASH REFUND of our Capital within 30 days or according to period stipulated in the contract. If u can't attend the 8/2/13 EGM, please make sure you send a proxy to attend so that your vote can be counted. 3/4 in value of the Growers present or by proxy are needed to pass a resolution. If you need detailed explanation please email or call me"


FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 02:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hyh78 @ Jan 23 2013, 02:13 PM)
if vote FOR = meaning we will follow their proposal and I don't think we can change the terms and condition. end up they pay us back 10% and 90% (in 2 years time frame).
                    no need to talk about 2012 dividend anymore as it was not even mention inside the circular.

If vote AGAINST = meaning we don't agree with the clause that they propose, we want it to change so that it sound fair to us as INVESTORS.
                            meaning a lot time will be wasted (trustee side, court, etc)...

vote FOR = 2 years time frame
vote AGAINST = 2 years or more (nobody can be sure of this time frame)
in the end, I still need either the 2012 dividends or the 10%. I'm really depending on that for medical purposes....  cry.gif
*
DONT TALK NONSENSE OK.

U WORK IN CHGS IS IT? OR JUST LIKE TO TALK BS & SPREAD PANIC FOR FUN?

UR BS BOUT 'vote AGAINST = 2 years or more (nobody can be sure of this time frame)' IS UTTER NONSENSE!

VOTING AGAINST, IF ANYTHING, WOULD ENSURE SPEEDIER REMUNERATION AS BUYER FINDS THE SETTLEMENT TERM PERIOD DISAGREEABLE & WANTS SPEEDIER REMUNERATION. ITS EVEN STATED 30 DAYS OR SPECIFIED PERIOD IN THE CHGS CONRACT!!!

READ MY PREV POST BEFORE TALKING SUCH NONSENSE!


FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 03:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(sam sam @ Jan 23 2013, 02:56 PM)
instead of posting in all caps lock, > I LIKE CAPS. I POST IN CAPS. DUN NEED ANYONE DICTATING MY FONT PREFERENCE.
list down the exact words in the CHGS contract saying that is 30 days or less so that others can vote knowing that its covered > JUST REFER UR CONTRACTS! DOES EVERYTHING NEED TO BE SPOONFED?!

if its covered and they must refund in 30 days what happens when its not done. take them to court? at the moment their assets are not enough to do a full refund unless they sell the land. ITs a Sdn Bhd company you can only take them for their capital. > DO U UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF 'TRUSTEE'? WHO SAID ANYTHING BOUT 'take them for their capital.'

the poster above is concern and even needs the dividend for medical purpose. > IRRELEVANT. EVER1'S GOT A MILLION & 1 PROBS - DOESNT MEAN YOU CAN STATE UNSUBSTANTIATED FACTS LIKE ITS TRUE & SPREAD PANIC. THATS BLOODY IRRESPONSIBLE & FOOLISH. NO EXCUSE.
*
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 03:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hyh78 @ Jan 23 2013, 03:13 PM)
I'm not talking BS. I'm talking about worst case scenario only....and who the F are u to judge my comments.
Don't pretend that you know ANYTHING and EVERYTHING....
If you don't like my comments, just leave it. I'm not trying to stir FIRE here....I am in the same boat as anyone else here...GOT IT??
*
MORE BS. F OFF, MORON.

DUN GET ALL PISSY COZ SOME1 CALLED U ON UR BSHIT.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 03:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(mkhor7 @ Jan 23 2013, 03:25 PM)
Hi FalseAlias

All buyers are very angry and disappointed with this Proposal by PGCB.  Until the meeting day, many of us are still confused and grieving over our imminent losses.
But please, fellow forum members here do not need harsh words.

CHGS by their action is throwing the contract covenants into the bin because they claim no foreseeable profitability from the CHGS plantation, and they do not want to "subsidy" from their other plantation and business.  Money talks louder than their dignity.

Our best strategy now could be vote Against their Proposal, then use the meeting to find alternative solutions.  Be prepared for more meetings after CNY with the Trustee and PGCB.
One sure thing by voting Against is that CHGS must pay us 2012 yield of 12% due on Valentine Day Feb-14.
*
WZUP mkhor7

All buyers are very angry and disappointed with this Proposal by PGCB. Until the meeting day, many of us are still confused and grieving over our imminent losses. > EXACTLY. SO THERE'S NEED TO CREATE UNNECESSARY PANIC. IF PPL ARE STATING OPINIONS, CLEARLY SAY ITS OPINION. DUN ACT LIKE ITS FACT.

But please, fellow forum members here do not need harsh words. > OH, I NEVER INSTIGATE SALTY LANGUAGE. BUT AM MORE THAN HAPPY TO RETALIATE WID EM.

CHGS by their action is throwing the contract covenants into the bin because they claim no foreseeable profitability from the CHGS plantation, and they do not want to "subsidy" from their other plantation and business. Money talks louder than their dignity. > BOTTOMLINE, SCHEME SHUD BE TRANSFERRED BY TRUSTEE TO A VIABLE PARTY WHO CAN BRING IT UP AGAIN. FAILING THAT, FULL CAPITAL REMUNERATION & 12% ROI WITHIN A MAX 1 YEAR PERIOD IS A MUST. WORSE CASE SCENARIO > WE STILL OWN THE LAND.

Our best strategy now could be vote Against their Proposal, then use the meeting to find alternative solutions. Be prepared for more meetings after CNY with the Trustee and PGCB. > AGREED! NO WAY IT WILL BE RESOLVED IN 1 MEET.

[b]One sure thing by voting Against is that CHGS must pay us 2012 yield of 12% due on Valentine Day Feb-14. > EXACTLY. NOW, WHY CANT THE REST GRASP THIS SIMPLE CONCEPT...?
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 03:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(sam sam @ Jan 23 2013, 03:19 PM)
for the record i would like to get back my money, i have come to terms that any investment has risks. IN the event they close the scheme and refund only 65% i personally stand to lose 80K + dividend for 2012

like everyone else i would like to get this back.
If the company does not have enough assets to sell back to cover 194 million what can the trustee do? the trustee best case scenario is to selll all assets and they are still short of 87million.
They still need to sell the estate. which may take time.
SO the trustee can liquidate all the asset and then find buy ers for the estate thats the best they can do
*
WHERE ARE U GETTIN UR FIGURES, SAM? > refund only 65%
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 23 2013, 07:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(SabahMan @ Jan 23 2013, 07:18 PM)
Friends, I am one of the disappointed. Truth be told. This scheme was a scam from the beginning. It. Was too good to be true but I did not trust my better judgement. I was forewarned to be careful about. LKY. Everyone i have spoken to immediately told me he has a black name. So I want to BAIL OUT NOW! Cut my losses.  Demand they give back our principal as soon as possible. Don't harbour any ILLUSIONS of any future profit with this faecal venture. For those who want to continue, hey..have you seen any of the oil palm trees yet? It is a scam. Buy land cheap ,  elevate expectations, promise at least 12 percent interest and sell the land for twice the price. Brothers, only a cheat will promise guaranteed income and only fools would believe. We were fools! This guy is a known con man. I WANT TO GET OUT OF THIS TITANIC now.
*
OMG. THEY HAVE TRUSTEES & ARE BACKED BY A BANK, MAN.

& PPL HAVE INDEED SEEN THE PALM OIL. FIRST BATCH OF BIG BUYERS WERE GIVEN A FULL TOUR, HELICOPTER RIDE, ETC.

CHEER UP - IT AINT AS BAD AS U THINK.

JUST GOTTA STAY CALM & PROCEED IN THIS MATTER WITH A COOL HEAD & PROPER FACTS.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 10:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(SabahMan @ Jan 23 2013, 09:35 PM)
We cannot run this estate ourselves.  Our current management team want to bail out. What is we continue and our directors reallly bail out ? Then what do we do? Who is going to organise a new management team? Get out now. Grab the 24+percent we have earned the past 3 years.
*
YOUR MATHS IS INACCURATE.

WE DONT GAIN 24% ROI... WE ACTUALLY LOSE 36% ROI!!!

HOW?

LIKE THIS > (1) IF DONT GET DIVIDENDS THIS YEAR, THATS 12% GONE.

(2) NEXT, IF WE VOLUNTARILY TERMINATE & ACCEPT 2 YEAR PAYMENT... THATS ANOTHER 12% X 2, WHICH EQUALS TO 24% IF THE SCHEME CONTINUED NORMALLY.

COMBINE BOTH & IT MEANS WE LOSE A WHOOPING 36%, AS WELL AS LOSE ACCESS TO OUR CASH FOR 2 YEARS!!!

AT LEAST IF IT WAS IN BANK, WOULD BE EARNING 2% - 4% INTEREST IN THOSE 2 YEARS...

This post has been edited by FALSEALIAS: Jan 24 2013, 10:26 AM
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 10:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(mkhor7 @ Jan 23 2013, 09:21 PM)
Some forum members here are saying we get in a new management company to take over the CHGS plantation, but this could be time consuming, costly and unproductive as the new teams would unlikely give us good terms.  As the trustee only know about sitting behind a desk, who will the trustee appoint? It is more beneficial to stick with current team if we want long term results.  Suggest that we do not go into termination or winding up the scheme even on different terms. 

For most of us, we buy into CHGS because we want to partner a palm oil plantation venture here.  If the plantation now is in bad shape and some trees were lost, allow the current team some time to restore it.  But there may be some of us who want a steady returns of at least 5% each year... CHGS under revised terms may still provide this...???  They have to show us the new figures. Please note that the Gua Musang Plantation Operation has increasing profit trend from 2009 to Oct-2012 as shown in the Circular.

I feel the Board of PGCB made this VT Proposal because they do not the money now to pay 12% without losing a small piece of their shirt.  And if the plantation is as bad as they claimed, it has no means to pay us 10% to 12% yield on every Valentine Day up to year 2030.
*
For most of us, we buy into CHGS because we want to partner a palm oil plantation venture here. If the plantation now is in bad shape and some trees were lost, allow the current team some time to restore it. > AGREED. TAKE A SHORT TERM HIT. ITS STILL A VIABLE VENTURE AS DEMONSTRATED BY GLOBAL TRENDS. I'M IN IT FOR THE LONG RUN. CHGS IS USING CUT & BAIL TACTIC & PROB WANTED TO MAKE A SHORT TERM PROFIT FROM THE START.


I feel the Board of PGCB made this VT Proposal because they do not the money now to pay 12% without losing a small piece of their shirt. And if the plantation is as bad as they claimed, it has no means to pay us 10% to 12% yield on every Valentine Day up to year 2030. > THEY'RE BASTARDS FOR DOIN IT - BUT YEAH, I WOULD RATHER ACCEPT A LOWER ROI & THIS SCHEME GO THRU FOR THE LONG TERM.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 10:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hyh78 @ Jan 24 2013, 12:37 AM)
Yes, I understand that I am being steered into accepting their proposal but u have to understand, I am just a small fish in a large pond.
They are the pond and they proposed (control) everything, what am I suppose to do? fight with the big guys?
I even received emails from my agents telling me to vote AGAINST and he is telling all his customers as well.

I don't have any answers to ur question on the how, when, what, I guess that will be answered during 8th Feb but what I know is that both FOR and AGAINST will both result in disadvantage to us as an investor. The only difference between FOR and AGAINST is FOR (2 years time frame according to the proposal), a glimpse of hope. U might get ur 90% money back, u walk away forgetting about this and look for a new investment. Let say the AGAINST win the vote, what is the next course of action?? Trustee steps in, PGCB replaced by a new management, don't care anymore, Bee Garden no longer have to bear anything anymore, no more responsibilities from their side. Will the new management be able to run the business as normal? Are they going to revise a new agreement to all the growers? How can u be sure that the new management won't let this kind of crap to happen again? If they can't manage it, they wind up, I get nothing at all...and I have to go through this more than the 2 years time frame just to know in the end it's a dead end.

It is unfortunate that this happens now after enjoying the dividend for the past 5 years but for me after looking at the big picture, short term pain is better than long term pain.
I know many ppl won't accept my comment but anyway, this is my opinion only. no hard feelings.
*
YOUR COMMENTS & OPINIONS ARE FULLY LAUDED.

EVERYONE WILL APPRECIATE AN OPINION WHEN ITS CLEARLY STATED AS AN OPINION & NOT AS A FACT.

G'LUCK TO YOU HOWEVER THIS TURNS OUT.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(SabahMan @ Jan 24 2013, 10:39 AM)
Thank you for the comments False Alias. This company does not have the money to pay us the dividends. They said they can't and therefore won't. It looks like their parent company won't either. The 12% interest rate is unrealistic if we base it on their earnings form this estate. The only way we can fight for it is if we sue them. This itself is complicated with so many shareholders.Even if we win they can just declare bankruptcy and we get nothing. Forget about ROI. Cut our losses and get out of this rotten marriage. Many people don't understand. All we have is a certificate that we own a share of the profits. WE DON"T OWN ANY land. This certificate is now near to being worthless because no one will buy our shares except this company. They are willing to do the less evil thing which is to buy it back. Take it. Do you want to be bounded to these jokers the next 20 years. ROI or not the mental and psychological stress is not worth it. I forsee if we continue this partnership, we will forever be arguing about the dividends they give us each year. Take out our principal. Cut our losses from potential ROI lost and invest it elsewhere like under our mattress.
*
TQ FOR THE COUNTER POINTS, SabahMan.

IF IT CAME DOWN TO IT, ITS STILL BETTER TO VOTE AGAINST SIMPLY BECAUSE WE CAN AMEND THE TERMS SO MUCH BETTER.

THE NO ROI, 2 YEARS STAGGERED PAYMENT, ETC IS RIDICULOUS.

THEY DEF CAN DO BETTER - SO, A VOTE AGAINST TELLS THEM THAT EXACTLY > "NO, YOUR TERMS ARE UNSUITABLE & WOULD NEED TO BE AMENDED FURTHER IN OUR FAVOUR IN ORDER FOR US TO EVEN CONSIDER IT ACCEPTABLE".

GIVES US ROOM TO NEGO, INSTEAD OF ACCEPTING THE SCRAPS THEY'RE THROWING AT US.

LEGALLY, ANYTHING DONE 'VOLUNTARILY' BEARS NO CONSEQUENCE.

... & THIS IS DEFINITELY UNDER DURESS, THERE'S NOTHING VOLUNTARILY ABOUT THE WAY THEY'RE FORCING IT ON US.

FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 11:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hyh78 @ Jan 24 2013, 10:56 AM)
1st of all, being a gentleman, I would like to make a public apologize to False Alias for being rude last yesterday. Sorry.

2nd, I am fully agreed with what SabahMan said.
These are multi million dollar companies. What makes u think they are not gear up for a lawsuit? They can hire the best lawyer in the country if they want to.
Or maybe, they want to find an easy way out by EXPECTING ppl to sue them, when they don't want to ENTERTAIN us anymore, screw it, declared bankruptcy, we get nothing.
Just put urself in their shoes. If you are the company, wouldn't u do the same?
That's the power of the corporation. Like I said, it is unfortunately that this happens now.
I know many investors has enjoyed the dividends year after year, I myself too and suddenly the dividends are being cut off, everybody feels uncomfortable.
Sometimes thinking logically it much better than theoretically.
*
IT'S COOL, MAN smile.gif

PEACE.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(mkhor7 @ Jan 24 2013, 11:35 AM)
Beginning to like your ALL CAP, direct to the point...

It may be a foregone conclusion they will get their FOR votes.  LKY team up to the last Prospectus date of  12-June-2012 is still selling good points about CHGS.
What were their plannings and strategies since then ???
*
Beginning to like your ALL CAP, direct to the point... > TQ, SIR/MAAM. THE FEELING'S MUTUAL - DIGGING YOUR ACCURATE OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS & ASTUTE FINDING OF ACTIONABLE FACTS. GUESS GAME RECOGNIZES GAME cheers.gif


It may be a foregone conclusion they will get their FOR votes. LKY team up to the last Prospectus date of 12-June-2012 is still selling good points about CHGS.
What were their plannings and strategies since then ??? > AN INTERESTING THOUGHT OCCURRED TO ME - MIGHT BE A WIN, PARTIAL WIN FOR ALL SIDES CONCERNED. WILL PM YOU LATER 2DAY BOUT IT AFTER DOIN A QUICK FEASIBILITY STUDY.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 05:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(mkhor7 @ Jan 24 2013, 02:06 PM)
They are not running away.  The plantation is viable, just slower returns than expected and they used wrong assumptions in their calculations. 
PGCB is refunding the Grower fee, but at their term of two years without paying any further yield to us.  They can easily obtained loan at lower rates than 12% now, but Voting FOR means we allow them free use of our money for two years mad.gif .

What is our strength? Are we hopeless?
icon_question.gif

CHGS being MCA Wanita linked cannot afford bad publicity now.  Chua Soi Lek should tell LKY to improve the refund terms.  Definitely not delay the balance to two years later.

Some may prefer an option to stay on with CHGS for the long term.  We can agree to revised the Fourth Schedule for a Win-Win position.
*
What is our strength? Are we hopeless? > NO, WE'RE NOT! SPAAARTA! vmad.gif

JOKES ASIDE THOUGH, THIS IS A MATTER TO BE SOLVED BY COOL HEADS BACKED BY STRONG, IRREFUTABLE HARD FACTS TO BE DELIVERED IN A PROFESSIONAL BUT FIRM MANNER IN THE MEETING/OTHER AVENUES.

CHGS BROKE FAITH WITH THEIR BLATANT ATTEMPT TO BLINDSIDE/PANIC US WITH THE INTENT OF FORCING COMPLIANCE/GETTING KNEEJERK REACTION FROM US - SO, WE'LL RESPOND IN A COOL, COLLECTED MANNER TO SHOW THEM WE'RE FULLY AWARE OF THEIR UNDERHANDED TACTICS AND CALL THEM ON IT. MAYBE EVEN MAKE IT PUBLIC.

POTENTIAL PUBLIC EMBARRASSMENT & HARD FACTS = GREAT LEVERAGE FOR NEGOTIATING BETTER TERMS.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 24 2013, 05:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hpcp @ Jan 24 2013, 05:02 PM)
What I was trying to express was that we can compare whether Golden Palm has the same difficulty as with Country Heights. We can look at their yield etc. If not, Country Heights may have bullshit us to sell it cheap to them
*
IF ANYTHING, GP WUD BE FIRST IN LINE WAITING TO OVERSEE / BUY OVER / MANAGE CHGS CURRENT PLOTS.

ITS A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD FOR US - CAN BE BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO US.
FALSEALIAS
post Jan 25 2013, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
80 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(hyh78 @ Jan 24 2013, 06:00 PM)
that proposal is to calm ourselves only (fake hope)...I doubt GP will ever take over CHGS...
will you as a company buy another company's asset which are projecting negative returns in the near future??? NO dude...
time to bail out...
*
I DEF WUD BUY - ESPECIALLY IF ITS PALM OIL INDUSTRY WHICH HAS GREAT GROWTH POTENTIAL.

BUY WHEN CHEAP - NUTURE TILL PROFITABLE.

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0391sec    0.31    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 03:11 AM