We have to take into account that prices will not remain stagnant. It goes up and down daily but the long term trend is upwards over the last 20 years due to its fundamentals being a strong food based commodity. 97-98 is the lowest point of the economic cycle. As it is about 10 years since 97-98, it is well predicted that this is another cycle of downturn which naturally happens. However, one should also take note, after 97-98 the law of economic cycle took into effect and the upward trend takes its course.
For the CHGS investment, economic cycle downturns are well taken into account. In fact we expect 2-3 downturns during the course of the investment. Which is why the returns are stretched out to 23 years and capped at 17% max (due to downturn factor). As investors, even if CPO prices drop for 1-2 years lets say similar to 97-98 which is almost the production cost, they still do not lose anything. Why?
1) At close to production cost, dividents are still paid out during those years, although lower, at 5-6%. During these bleak period, I doubt that any other investment instrument will continue to offer good or even any returns.
2) As investors are acquiring land in 1/4 acre plots, as you have pointed out although land scarcity may or may not affect the yield prices, it does affect land. When the land prices increase, the investment value also increases. This is the 2nd part of the returns for investors, as 6 mths before the contract is completed, an independant valuer will value the plantation and proceeds plus capital appreciation shall be returned to the investors. If we take a 20 year look at the prices of plantation, no doubt the prices will increase. How much increase will depend on the market in 20 years time plus other factors. On average, last 20 years fully equipped plantations with good access average out to RM8,000 per acre and now the average is about RM30,000+ (375% increase).
From our feedback from plantation managers and plantation owners, if in the worse case scenario for 1 particular year the FFB/CPO price really does drop rock bottom to production price, it does not stay rock bottom forever as there is a mechanism to counter-balance the price drop. If it is no longer profitable to harvest, what they do is, they simply do not harvest. When there is still demand but very little supply, prices go back up. It is not only for palm oil but for all food based plantation. When economy goes down, people do not need to buy goods and services, but they still need to eat, so that is why for food based commodity no doubt there is daily fluctuation, in the long term the trend is always upwards.
* on a side note, US has become our 4th largest importer in a short period of 2 years. Actually their biodiesel industry does not use our palm oil much, but instead they use what they have in abundance ie. corn oil. When this happened, they needed something to replace their consumable oil. Palm oil being the cheapest and also what you pointed out, higher in claorific content (basically safe and healthy), become their replacement for edible oil. Another major use is for their food packaging (their packet food eg chips etc which is another billion dollar industry). Previously they used artificial transfat oil to coat their packaging but once they found out that this caused health problems ie cancer, they used palm oil as a replacement as it is natural transfat oil.
QUOTE(Michael J. @ Sep 17 2008, 05:56 PM)
Hi Danny, you're quite close. I'm not an agriculturist, but a field-based plant scientist.
Mmm... I agree to an extend about what you noted there.
I'm with you on the first point, especially because vegetable oil is the cheapest source of calory. Palm oil is not only higher in calorific content compared to other edible oil crops, the oil palm is also the most productive oil crop in the world. On a per hectare basis, oil palms produce more than 3 times the average product of rape seed, soy bean, or canola annually. Hence, this makes palm oil highly desirable as an edible oil source.
But it is also this high productivity that stumbles point number two. Although land scarcity will make land prices expensive, that does not mean it will drive prices up. As agricultural practices become more efficient, the productivity of the land can be increased dramatically, which means you need less land to produce more. Let's just take one well known plantation as example: United Plantations Berhad. While the national average for palm oil production stands at about 4 tonnes per hectare, UPB has managed to up their productivity till 6-7 tonnes CPO per hectare. So for the production of say 100tonnes of CPO, an average plantation might need 25ha; UPB would only need about 16ha. Furthermore, oil palms are perennials, not annuals. With sustainable agricultural practices, it would be possible to retain the fertility of the land so that cultivation can continue for more than 100 years. Certainly, UPB has done that. Hence, land scarcity is not a major issue for existing and near future oil palm cultivation IF sustainability is maintained.
For non-plantation purposes, land scarcity will drive prices up, and yes, the demand for land will lead to higher valuation of plantation land. But that is deemed appreciation value on the property, and it does not mean it will translate into the cost of the final product.
About inflation.... if production cost goes up, will that really mean selling prices will go up? 1997-1998 was a pretty bad year for all oil palm growers; CPO was going for RM700-800 per tonne then. RM700-800 per tonne CPO at current costings means certain death to the plantation. Do take note that the average production cost at that time was almost 80% of the selling price of CPO, and many plantations folded. Similarly, the current pricing of CPO runs the risk to be a repeat of history as average costings stand at about 40% selling price.
Of course, as with most other commodities, CPO prices will not keep its downward spiral, and in two years time it might rebound to greater heights. But how certain is this? Look at other crops as example: Cocoa, coffee, rubber. All of these plantation crops used to be worth their weight in gold, but now have such low profit margins that they are not suitable for conventional large plantations.
On this respect of inflation, what should be looked at is not so much about the pricing, but the translated cost of production. Like the UPB example given earlier, if the plantation is efficient, then the effects of inflation is spread more sparsely. Right now palm oil is still traded close to the pool system, but what will happen if an efficient producer decides to sell his oil at a lower price? His profit margin will still be high, but his pricing will be lower than all the rest, which makes it more attractive. Although this may not make sense for conventional economics, there is sound logic for doing this.
Let's leave biodiesel out of the picture; the EU's new policy cleary shows that there is a bleak future for biodiesel. Only the US seems keen on it (makes sense seeing what they have done so far). Vitamin E, Carotene complex, and other nutraceuticals might lead to a niche market, but honestly, this is a downstream activity. Unless the plantation also has the facilities to extract, process, and package those products, this kind of niche market is immaterial to the plantation.
This post has been edited by DannyOP: Sep 18 2008, 12:34 PMMmm... I agree to an extend about what you noted there.
I'm with you on the first point, especially because vegetable oil is the cheapest source of calory. Palm oil is not only higher in calorific content compared to other edible oil crops, the oil palm is also the most productive oil crop in the world. On a per hectare basis, oil palms produce more than 3 times the average product of rape seed, soy bean, or canola annually. Hence, this makes palm oil highly desirable as an edible oil source.
But it is also this high productivity that stumbles point number two. Although land scarcity will make land prices expensive, that does not mean it will drive prices up. As agricultural practices become more efficient, the productivity of the land can be increased dramatically, which means you need less land to produce more. Let's just take one well known plantation as example: United Plantations Berhad. While the national average for palm oil production stands at about 4 tonnes per hectare, UPB has managed to up their productivity till 6-7 tonnes CPO per hectare. So for the production of say 100tonnes of CPO, an average plantation might need 25ha; UPB would only need about 16ha. Furthermore, oil palms are perennials, not annuals. With sustainable agricultural practices, it would be possible to retain the fertility of the land so that cultivation can continue for more than 100 years. Certainly, UPB has done that. Hence, land scarcity is not a major issue for existing and near future oil palm cultivation IF sustainability is maintained.
For non-plantation purposes, land scarcity will drive prices up, and yes, the demand for land will lead to higher valuation of plantation land. But that is deemed appreciation value on the property, and it does not mean it will translate into the cost of the final product.
About inflation.... if production cost goes up, will that really mean selling prices will go up? 1997-1998 was a pretty bad year for all oil palm growers; CPO was going for RM700-800 per tonne then. RM700-800 per tonne CPO at current costings means certain death to the plantation. Do take note that the average production cost at that time was almost 80% of the selling price of CPO, and many plantations folded. Similarly, the current pricing of CPO runs the risk to be a repeat of history as average costings stand at about 40% selling price.
Of course, as with most other commodities, CPO prices will not keep its downward spiral, and in two years time it might rebound to greater heights. But how certain is this? Look at other crops as example: Cocoa, coffee, rubber. All of these plantation crops used to be worth their weight in gold, but now have such low profit margins that they are not suitable for conventional large plantations.
On this respect of inflation, what should be looked at is not so much about the pricing, but the translated cost of production. Like the UPB example given earlier, if the plantation is efficient, then the effects of inflation is spread more sparsely. Right now palm oil is still traded close to the pool system, but what will happen if an efficient producer decides to sell his oil at a lower price? His profit margin will still be high, but his pricing will be lower than all the rest, which makes it more attractive. Although this may not make sense for conventional economics, there is sound logic for doing this.
Let's leave biodiesel out of the picture; the EU's new policy cleary shows that there is a bleak future for biodiesel. Only the US seems keen on it (makes sense seeing what they have done so far). Vitamin E, Carotene complex, and other nutraceuticals might lead to a niche market, but honestly, this is a downstream activity. Unless the plantation also has the facilities to extract, process, and package those products, this kind of niche market is immaterial to the plantation.
Sep 18 2008, 11:56 AM

Quote


0.0337sec
0.27
6 queries
GZIP Disabled