1) Agong and omnipotent power
fuh, selective memory? Are you forgetting Perak constitutional crisis chapter? Nizar neither resigned nor was he dismissed, former Perak Meow directly appointed new MB and ousted him out by force. L Initially the High Court ruled that meow can't constitutionally remove Nizar and that he was the rightful MB, only for it to be overturned and that direct appointment of new MB can effectively void old MB. Last last, it sets a new precedent whereby Meow can appoint new MB without firing old one or he himself resigning.

Care to address why direct appointment won't happen on Federal level and the top post lies on the hands of court once again? Inb4 you dismiss my suspicion as colorful thinking, the precedent has been set in Perak, you don't get to change history. After all, Constitution literally says Agong can act on his own discretion when appointing PM, not my words.

Care to address what's stopping any Meow on the Agong post from going down such path? Care to explain how all of that together is "not omnipotent"?

2) This Pahang Meow played it out almost perfectly
Also, in 2020, it all happened behind closed doors, the situation wasn't as clear cut as elections where the people's mandate are reflected through election result, the mandate for PM was only up to the MPs decision at that time. How do you know for certain that no hanky-panky business like Meow asserting his own will happened bts? Do you have proof beyond reasonable doubt that this never happened? Does you 'almost perfectly' not include transparency? The fact remains that in 2020, he could have asked the MPs to duke it out in the Parliament to see who is the PM and he didn't, and that will be a plague that will follow him to grave.

Come year 2022, no clear mandate for PM again due to hung Parliament. Agong comes into picture once again. Moo did say MPs can submit their own SDs for PM of their respective choice without consulting their respective party leadership while not switching party and this was not against anti-hopping law, although ungentlemanly. Many would like to believe that Agong followed anti-hopping law's spirit and abode by the en-bloc vote of each party leadership, again, it's done behind closed doors, no one knows the truth which principle Agong adhered to in choosing PM. Did he really follow en-bloc SDs or follow individual SDs. At worst, how do you know Agong did not overreach and exert his own will on PM's choice over the two principles aforementioned?

I believe you are neither a hypocrite nor a coward, care to counter these arguments instead of dismissing it as colorful thinking?

Sigh, you again.

tl:dr So you prefer having our own local brand of Mohammed bin Salman over here, in all his gold & glory? Omnipotent means at minimum that, and then some.

Anyway you should believe I'm a hypocrite and a coward (and whatever your mind can conjure), if that's what it take to get into your ignore list. I make it a point not to engage with anybody who brings up 13th May for no apparent reason, PAS extremists or otherwise.