this is easy chap adi, last time differ sis with accomplice lampazhi, leon, frankie they all one family gang slander and backstab people until hundred pages...imagine the amount of bad karma to pay in future

wonder your husband knows your evil deed here? I know your husband family is rich but you can never beat bad karma for slandering people.

You are evil slanderer is proven beyond doubt because she just slanders without proof.. Where is the proof Allan Goh and LamTin is scammer?

This post has been edited by Accord2018: Oct 20 2023, 08:56 AM

Got evil slanderer will say ownself is evil slanderer? Say or not say, evidence speaks, if no evidence then don't slander. Or else no need court already.

Btw you are not even a criminal lawyer. Based on your past post , you only handle mostly property contracts. That's why so free to troll here for years.

This post has been edited by Accord2018: Oct 21 2023, 01:28 PM

Low IQ and evil always think charged=guilty and assume all the police testimonies must be believable. But Low IQ cannot differentiate between scamming and breach of contract.

[41] Dalam kes State and Raymond Titus (High Court Ref No: 13858), Mahkamah Tinggi Afrika Selatan membincangkan mengenai pendekatan yang perlu diambil dalam menilai keterangan saksi polis seperti berikut:

[11] As noted earlier, the fact that Horn was a policeman did not per se entitle his evidence to greater weight than that of the accused nor constitute a basis for laying caution to rest. It is true that the accused in the present case, if he was guilty, had a motive to testify dishonestly, i.e. to avoid conviction and punishment; but this is true in virtually every criminal case. Furthermore, and while one naturally does not expect a policeman to lie and falsely implicate an accused person, it is unfortunately not possible to say that this never happens. Police officials may have a desire to obtain convictions, particularly where a suspect is known to them as a person who has had previous brushes with the law or is one whom they suspect for other reasons (not founded in the evidence before the court) of having engaged in criminal activity. I do not for a moment suggest that the majority of policeman would behave in this way but, where an accused protests his innocence, one cannot dismiss it out of hand as being by its very nature a far-fetched possibility.

[42] Kami bersetuju dengan pendekatan yang diambil oleh kes di atas dan berpendapat ia merupakan pendekatan yang betul dalam mempertimbangkan keterangan yang diberikan oleh saksi-saksi agensi-agensi penguatkuasa, termasuklah saksi polis.

That why world 3 with people like you and 9m2w to judge without credentials or at least with some evidence. If just based on hearsay, pig also can fly.