In my own experience Chat-GPT is great at pushing me in the right direction to solve a coding problem. But bad at making a totally compliant solution. Google Bard is worse though

Have you tried Bing?

If yes, so despite flaws, ChatGPT is still better than the others?

Still a useful tool for many ppl

I think ChatGPT has already established itself in the mainstream

I prefer chat-gpt.
When and if i can use GPT-4 with Bing on my desktop I think it will be better. I already get that on my mobile.
But so far I only get GPT-3 on Bing on desktop.

Goodbye programmers: Team of AI bots develops software in 7 minutes instead of 4 weeks

https://vulcanpost.com/843379/team-of-ai-bo...ead-of-4-weeks/

You may use machine to produce software like a factory.

But you may need engineer to design,
and technician to find out if there is some bugs or backdoor.

I don’t think it’s a full-fledge solution. Just a proof of concept. Chatgpt can be wrong 50% of the time. And yes, we still need engineer to fine tune the codes

no matter what non-IT bosses think of AI, it is not matured enough to replace anyone, but it is a good tool to guide people, push you in the right direction, or just like talking to someone about your problems until u find the answer yourself.

chat buddy for introverts

this olis not how u use gpt...

Create custom ai assistance for boss, charge 150-350 per month.

My experience with it is bad. Too much hallucination.

I think ChatGPT was initially genius when it's user base and training data came from the top 0.001% of the world's population.

And then they let it loose in the world, where half the world's population is below average IQ... hehehe

just saying that this is true, but I'd make that 50% correct answers to be even lower
used chatgpt to help kicking start a java spring project (was completely inexperienced in java and spring)
many answers given by chatgpt either didn't make sense or outright wrong
ok for boilerplate, but bad for many specifics

sometimes chatgpt just like the boy answering questions in final exam

die die must answer something and make you believe it is the correct answer

you need verify the answer

If AI can do almost all we can do, then don't give them the ability to do maintenence on themselves, then only we won't be replaced, ya?

chatgpt is ok for popular programming language

the more obscure the thing you are doing, the higher chances you get bullshit answer

the irony is for knowledge that are more secure is where you need chatgpt the most

so its not all that useful. i use chatgpt to do task i already know how to do but too lazy to do myself because i can verify the output

i was doing kubernetes, terraform, github workflow all those stuff

the bloody chatgpt gave me wrong answer when i ask me to proof read the .kube deployment file. it die die tell me i must create volume mount but i actually dont because i already COPY the file over using docker

wasted 3 hours of my life wondering whats wrong

Hmmm. I think it depends on how the user entered their inputs. Or how strong their programming fundamental and knowledge. User really needs the hands on experience prior to the expected response.

In my case, my productivity goes beyond 100% improvement. Like 2-3 sprints can be shortened to halfday or a day max. Excluding testing.

I just use copilot on windows, tested using ollama as well.. LOL

but I don't ask AI to write the whole function, but only help on certain parts. so far it does help on getting code written faster, but you have to make sure to know what code you paste in, else it will be a nightmare

They not provide sufficient details isit? So far i have no problem to use Chatgpt to generate some script...but need put very detail to get the correct 1

https://chatgpt.com/ is good for detailed explanation and example
and
https://poe.com/ChatGPT short and simple

both answer/code need to be tested and fix to work on your solution.