Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
gengstapo
post Oct 26 2007, 02:33 AM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(AoiNatsume @ Oct 26 2007, 01:43 AM)
3dmark06 configs should be left default for more accurate comparison(1280x1024). The benchies that were posted accs_centre is 3dm05 and not 06. 3dm05 default config is @ 1024x768 so its fair enough.

In regards to OC-ed CPU, if all test are performed on the same CPU clockspeed side by side then i think it is fair enough to be used as comparison between the GFX. Of course.. the GFX has to be runned on stock speed.

Then again as i mentioned previously.. 3dm really fails me. 2600XT Xfire gave me 9k+ while 8800GTS on stock speed gave me 8k+, but on real gaming.. do trust me when i say the difference is SIGNIFICANT sweat.gif

Real performance has to be seen with your own eyes and not synthetic benchmarks, given the same framerates it doesnt mean it would be smoother. IMO, i noticed that sometimes 3dmarks doesnt detect spikes or certain lags, even if its spiking the framerates are still above 50-80fps.
*
i think its becoz inmature driver or perhaps, the games u play not support crossfire m0od, thats y the performance worst than 3dmark, IMO smile.gif
gengstapo
post Nov 1 2007, 03:08 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(jimmy.soo @ Nov 1 2007, 02:39 PM)
hmm if its not G92? den whats this link about?
http://www.dailytech.com/But+Wait+Theres+M...article9474.htm


Added on November 1, 2007, 2:40 pm"the new GeForce 8800 GTS will likely surpass NVIDIA's high-end GeForce 8800 GTX and potentially GeForce 8800 Ultra."
*
its just a prediction i think
not yet in "making".. tongue.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0411sec    0.87    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 06:18 PM