Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Radeon HD 3870 and HD 3850 On The Horizon, The Dark Side is POWERFUL . come join

views
     
X.E.D
post Oct 24 2007, 02:45 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(khaidani @ Oct 24 2007, 08:17 AM)
but if the ati new chip benchmark is not as expected..they blame driver issue..
*
Yeah, that's why some people actually bought the 7900s. rolleyes.gif
In time when the driver's done, you'll be scared s***less.
X.E.D
post Oct 25 2007, 10:13 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 24 2007, 11:49 PM)
Well... For sure that ATI's reference red PCB + red hugea$$ cooler + red haired computer generated bimbo combo is FTW over NV's sucky green stuff.
*
In fashion sense, totally agreed.
As for the stupid pot calling the kettle black, have you even seen the MSI 8800GT? It's easily the fugliest card in 4 years or so.

In performance sense, read this:
http://rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33905882

Remember to actually use your mouse for highlighting.
X.E.D
post Oct 26 2007, 08:18 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


These things will be cheap.

RM750 launch price is not impossible for the 3850. And remember, while ATI can reach these prices while still getting profits, nV can't.

G92 is double size and more of a RV670. Starts at 250 Euro/RM1200+ and doesn't really seem to be able to go down anymore- how much did 8800GTS go down? Not much besides the normal supply/demand fluctuation.


RM750 for a card that runs as good as my 2900XT? Damn, I'll take 2. By then it can beat *any* single card config, whilst just costing RM1500. =D

X.E.D
post Oct 27 2007, 05:18 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


I'm LOLing. So the 8800GT is "cheap" and this isn't?

The Rm750 tip is pretty accurate for the 3850. Everything in Malaysia is more expensive (especially nVidia cards) so:

RM800 for a 3850 is reasonable. Should even be 512MB.
3870 should touch RM1000 (GDDR3), RM1200 (GDDR4, and super cooler)

Remember, these graphics cards are cheaper to produce than X1950 PROs.
Yes, cheaaapeeeeer. A LOT cheaper. Cheap. Get the idea? tongue.gif

(Now, let's see the nTards start spouting crap on ATI being "cheap". laugh.gif)
X.E.D
post Nov 1 2007, 06:32 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(daniel_lyw @ Nov 1 2007, 05:43 PM)
critics say it slows by 10~20%
its acttractive features would be native hdmi, uvd & more...

i could say its more like a all-in-one package...
how its does not as slow as what people predicted...

we will wait to its lunch
*

Critics = Fudzilla's assumption based on a nVidia 8800GT PR slide.


Thanks for the short notice. smile.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 4 2007, 10:01 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(Critical @ Nov 4 2007, 08:56 PM)
who care about the video playing performance,  most of the ppl buy high end display card for gaming
*
OEMs (duh)? They buy in volume and mostly confirmed numbers.


If this makes Quad Crossfire in Dell XPS/HP Blackbird systems, I doubt people like you would still be yapping. laugh.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 5 2007, 03:36 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(Drian @ Nov 5 2007, 10:53 AM)
My guess is the 3000 series will be in the range of 680-700 ringgit for it to be competitively priced compared to nvidia. Performance is smacked in between 8800gts and 8800gt.
Either way 8800gts is going to be very cheap soon.
*
I don't think so. Anyway, I still see the GTS640 a great buy if below 300USD (used)
1280*1024 of course should get GT, but 16*12/10 is GTS realm. 19*12 is firmly for the GTXes.

Even with the new "faster/cheating" driver the GT is still slower.

user posted image
user posted image

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Nov 5 2007, 03:38 PM
X.E.D
post Nov 5 2007, 04:14 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(kmarc @ Nov 5 2007, 03:43 PM)
Interesting. Most review I saw showed that the GT pwn GTS in almost any resolutions. Maybe newer games will show the above picture....... As much as I want to see the GTS 640mb beating the GT (cause I have one!!!), that would not have been an important issue as any games e.g. crysis would not be playable at that setting at 1600x1200. Wonder if the game settings were slightly lower so that the fps would be more playable, would the GTS still beat the GT?  hmm.gif
*
As much as I wanna see my 2900XT pwn supreme (GTS *and*GT) in DX10 this coming November Catalyst update, I'm not optimistic. laugh.gif

I think it's not enough video RAM. But the tests show otherwise- it's clearly bandwidth limited, with 1600*1200 noAA working just fine, betaing GTS.

Enjoy your 320-bit GTS, still. It runs nicely and not that slow either way. Painful if you bought it at over 350USD though. biggrin.gif

(Also, so funny to see that the 8800GT users going to say "Oh, AA doesn't matter now!". ROFLMAOWTFBBQOVERNINETHOUSAND)
X.E.D
post Nov 5 2007, 04:28 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(Drian @ Nov 5 2007, 04:19 PM)
when i mention gts i'm refering to the 320mb version.
However at 1600X1200 obviously all the textures, frame memory everything requires more memory and that's why the 640mb would have the edge here.

Anyway the isn't 640mb 8800gts at another higher price league already?
*
320MB sucks as always, I advised people quite some times NOT to buy it, and get the 2900Pro for what's it's worth.
whistling.gif Like that actually worked.


Without AA, the GT has no problems. With AA, it just dies off lol. Now you know why nVidia wanted to get the water reflections in Crysis to update so slowly- less taxing on the bandwidth side.

Again, it's not our fault that nVidia's attempt at G92 wasn't as expected (even if it had a 384 bit bus it's not on the GT, and terrible, terrible cooler.) It's also not our fault that the memory was 2Ghz DDR3, not something more spiffy.

I don't know how this goes for the Radeon 3850 (same drop?), but 3870 should be much better with that 2.4Ghz GDDR4.
X.E.D
post Nov 6 2007, 10:30 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


Dual 3850 Crossfire on a X38/975/790FX/790X or even nForce (xDNA, haha) = USD 340, aka what you guys used to pay for a 8800GTS 320MB.

(With 512MB, approx USD 170 X 2)

Should beat an 8800Ultra easily. GT pwn what? biggrin.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 7 2007, 06:28 AM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 6 2007, 11:53 PM)
Seems like they're doing another R600 because they can't compete on speed, as predicted. Lower clocks to improve yields and lower prices. At least this time it won't run R600 hot, but perf/watt is still lower than G92.
*
Err... 3870 now has a TDP of 105W.
It's very, very close otherwise.
But at this point both GPU archs need 45nm + HKMG to continue using clocks to play out. That isn't happening soon.
X.E.D
post Nov 7 2007, 03:43 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 7 2007, 06:57 AM)
105W maybe, but at what kind of performance? At this point it just seems that the G8x has much better perf/watt than R6xx on a similar process. And no one will have hk+mg on 45nm except intel. Everyone else is 32nm or later. NV has at least another higher end SKU in reserve, with higher clocks and more shaders. The current G92 chips seem to be clocked quite conservatively. I won't be surprised if NV releases another lower end G92 part to compete either. It will be interesting to see how it all pans out in the midrange, the price wars are always good.
*
And with that rumored to cost 300USD (or even moar), why is it even a big deal for 2 3850s at 2*170USD?

You said it yourself that the breaking point is the no. of power connectors, and it was in best interests for AMD not to get a faster "default" card out.
When you see the stock GT clocks they don't look *that* impressive too.
It doesn't mean however, that "Superclocked"/"Hyperclocked"/"XXX" etc. editions won't come sooner as the RV670 should be able to get to those speeds with a decent power module (dual slot cooling is there)

10% perf/watt disadvantage on peak load is nothing when you consider that their baseline is much smaller and power saving features do seem to be aplenty.

BTW AMD seems to be making a big, big, big deal out of Crossfire X plus the R680, so I think driver lag/game profile etc. issues would be resolved faster.
X.E.D
post Nov 7 2007, 11:26 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(seanl @ Nov 7 2007, 05:41 PM)
it'll take a few weeks after the dust is settled, the price will drop down to what ATI originally target....but by then, the 8800GT might even be cheaper still and the new line of GTS will be out... hmm.gif
*
The 3850/3870 will have a cheaper MSRP than the 8800GT already.

Looking at last round, even when the 8800GTS old's MSRP was 330-350USD outside of Malaysia while 2900XT was 380, 2900XT was way cheaper in Malaysia. nVidia has always been more expansive even on the same MSRP level (in US) in Malaysia, and AFAIK, people look happy getting ripped off (see GT for example). laugh.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 11 2007, 12:41 AM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(AceCombat @ Nov 10 2007, 11:32 PM)
it perform almost the same as 8800GT but dont knwo in game how?
btw,8800GT cheaper.
*
MSRP of this card is 220-250USD.

This is just pre-sale scalping. (just like what you guys kena laugh.gif )
X.E.D
post Nov 11 2007, 07:33 AM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Nov 11 2007, 03:52 AM)
dude u think u better check the prices
i already got the prices from all Ati partners
its more expensive than the 8800gt with no game bundle whatsoever.

its better u actually check the prices instead of hoping on the inquirer and some weird postings on some websites...

so far the 8800gt was sold lower than the MRSP when u see the OEM prices of those cards.
*
Well duh, PRE-SALE. The card hasn't launched yet.
Wait until after November 16 I think, there will be vendors that go according to MSRP.

For Malaysia it'll need a little longer because the of the retarded scalping acts. But it won't be as serious as the 8800GT.


For what I know 3850 would be in plentiful stock so no price hikes, yay. 3870 you should wait for the stock overclock versions that make it perform closer to the 8800GTs.
3850 256MB has double ++ the performance of 8600GTS for about RM150 more.

Put 2 (512MB 3850s) in Crossfire and they will be slightly more expensive than a GT or a GTS New, but in crossfire games, definite win. They won't be that noisy nor hot too.

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Nov 11 2007, 07:37 AM
X.E.D
post Nov 11 2007, 03:07 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Nov 11 2007, 02:52 PM)
no point arguing... wait for their respective official launch...
i got high hopes for AMD though... it seems tat they concentrate on their GC more than their procs... unsure.gif
*
Considering the Sapphire 2900XT, a card that takes at least double the $$$ to make in terms of pricing, is now 280USD (official)...

Blatantly obvious. smile.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 12 2007, 04:07 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


This obviously has better fans, better RAM (0.7ns GDDR4, and actually good RAMs that hit 2600-2700Mhz), better power modules (4+1(?) stage), and can decode VC-1 WMA files in hardware.
X.E.D
post Nov 13 2007, 07:03 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


Ugh... [H]ardOCP. Don't trust those nVidia shills.

I thought I saw a higher 3DMark score with a simillar CF rig. Care to turn Overdrive on? From what I've heard, the card is very cool and silent. 100% is of course noisy, but normal use it should be very silent.
X.E.D
post Nov 13 2007, 07:20 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


No actually,

AA is now normal, aka no big performance drops! rclxm9.gif

At 8XAA it's faster than the 8800GT. yawn.gif
X.E.D
post Nov 13 2007, 07:30 PM

curmudgeonosorus emeritus
******
Senior Member
1,955 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­ch


Should've rephrased that,

"Its hit in 8XAA is smaller than the 8800GT".

At stock clocks the 3870 loses a little for now (might be drivers) but OC 5-10% and you're even lol.

Put on 8XAA, and 5% is enough to top the 8800GT I think.

This post has been edited by X.E.D: Nov 13 2007, 07:30 PM

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0215sec    0.47    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 08:44 PM