Car brochures used to include *tested according to dont-know-what standard. at the fc figure.

Something like certain constant speed in a controlled environment. Meaning you can achieve it uf you match the test condition (a loophole, if you ask me).
But I have never seen any ice car brochure stating how many km range unlike EV.

Argue? You have barked at the wrong tree.

What I'm saying is:
ICE cars give fuel consumption in L/100km or km/L in a controlled environment which they stated somewhere (say 80km/h, steady speed, etc) which we in theory can achieve. The question is for how long. Even if it's just for 10s, they cannot be faulted for lying.

EVs pulak state their xxx km range instead of km/kWHr, meaning to achieve this range you need to drive within their test parameters for xxx km, which is BS as no real consumer can do that for xxx km.

My conclusion: ICE car manufacturers pannai, they quoted something which is still possibly achievable albeit for a short while, and usually a figure not too far off. EVs quote a figure which probably nobody can achieve and this makes consumers mad in view of added stress of range anxiety.

When ICE car official FC is not achievable, people don't kecoh because it's easy to refuel, compared to EV kot.

But you can imagine the hoo-ha if ICE cars have their FC stated in range, macam EV cars: City 600km, Vios 650km... confirm people will rage if they can only achieve 450km.

Agreed, it's easier to recharge at home compared to visiting petrol station.
However range anxiety kicks in when one is far away from home, macam how we need to tell ourselves to carry a power bank for hp when we'll be out the whole day even if we end up not needing it.

Those EV buyers may need more confidence in the actual range as they may travel often or make journeys beyond the typical home-office types.