QUOTE(plouffle0789 @ Jul 21 2023, 06:00 PM)
Lookout on Aircond Cooling Coil issue Honda City vs Honda Accord vs Honda Civic, 2010 vs 2004 vs 2012
Honda City vs Honda Accord vs Honda Civic, 2010 vs 2004 vs 2012
|
|
Jul 31 2023, 12:58 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
42 posts Joined: May 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2023, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]()
Junior Member
42 posts Joined: May 2020 |
Saga - good for seat comfort & handling Cons - Fuel Consumption high a bit (rented Saga 4AT in Langkawi, RM50 for 250km trip with 70-80kmh speed driving) Persona - spacious, comfort & Good handling than Almera & City Cons - Fuel consumption Almera - Spacious, good fuel consumption Cons - lookout for cooling coil issue, less powerful engine Mazda - great fuel consumption, better than City, good handling Cons - Maintenance bit higher than City, cramped rear seat, not as spacious as City & Bezza City - Spacious, bulletproof engine 118hp, good fuel consumption Cons - handling & Suspensions cant beat Mazda 2 & Persona & even Saga one, lookout for CVT, change CVT HCF2 oil every 40k km for longevity - RM14k for new unit at Honda SC Bezza - spacious & great fuel consumption + ASA Safety Feature Cons - handling & Suspensions is below City, rear seat less comfortable This post has been edited by samwan_sambadi: Jul 31 2023, 01:10 AM Ku9 liked this post
|
|
|
Jul 31 2023, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
42 posts Joined: May 2020 |
QUOTE(plouffle0789 @ Jul 31 2023, 01:12 AM) Honda City CVT Gearbox*If the gearbox kong, to replace new unit at SC costs you RM14k+ last check 2 years ago. If repair outside costs around RM3.5k depends on severity of damage Change CVT gearbox oil on every 40k km of mileage, or you can proceed to change every 20k km mileage by earliest |
|
|
Aug 1 2023, 12:25 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
42 posts Joined: May 2020 |
QUOTE(plouffle0789 @ Jul 31 2023, 02:05 AM) AT better than CVT? = CVT is best for fuel consumption, for spirited driving, better to use AT than CVT, can't say CVT is weak, Subaru XV Lineartronic CVT is also good, XV fuel consumption is decent, Non-turbo 2.0L boxer engineThis post has been edited by samwan_sambadi: Aug 1 2023, 12:43 AM |
| Change to: | 0.6040sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 04:51 PM |