Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sony DSC-H3, Your Opinion

views
     
TSknuu
post Oct 20 2007, 06:26 PM, updated 19y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Might plan to buy this. Tested it out in the shop and its pretty decent. What do you guys think about it?

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Sony/sony_dsch3.asp

If there are anything better or as good I don't mind you recommending it to me. Thanks
Andy0625
post Oct 20 2007, 09:41 PM

Certified Newbie
*******
Senior Member
3,910 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A



Canon S5is , Nikon P5100
calvin_gsc
post Oct 20 2007, 11:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I'd never get a Sony unless it's an Sony Alpha. I'd never been happy with any of the sony camera. But don't know how well this prosumer will perform.

By the way, read this

QUOTE
Except for a slow flash recycle time, the DSC-H3 performed well in our lab tests. The camera took 1.8 seconds to start up and capture its first JPEG, no doubt slowed a bit by the fact that the lens has to extend before you can shoot. It took 1.3 seconds between JPEGs with the flash disabled, jumping to 2.6 seconds between shots with the flash turned on. Shutter lag measured an impressive 0.4 second in our high-contrast test and 1 second in our low-contrast test, which mimic bright and dim shooting conditions, respectively. In burst mode, we were able to get an average of two frames per second, regardless of image size.

Image quality from the H3 can be quite nice if you stick with ISOs 100 and 200, though that niceness is marred a bit by the lens' noticeable distortion, as well as some purple fringing on high-contrast edges toward the edges of images. I saw more noise than I would've liked at ISO 400. While images are still very usable and much of the noise is minimized during printing, there is a noticeable falloff in shadow detail and fine detail at ISO 400. Stepping up to ISO 800, noise increases only slightly, but there's more of a falloff in shadow and fine detail. At ISO 1,600 noise becomes heavy and most shadow and fine detail is lost. The top sensitivity setting of ISO 3,200 yields extremely noisy images with completely blocked up shadows and fine details. For example, text which was crisp and clear at ISO 200 and below, becomes completely illegible at ISO 3,200. I suggest staying below ISO 1,600 when shooting with the H3 and sticking with ISO 100 or ISO 200 whenever possible.


http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/so...78725.html#more

If you're gonna pay so much for a prosumer camera, get one which has better ISO performance.

This post has been edited by calvin_gsc: Oct 21 2007, 12:05 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0135sec    1.36    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 07:34 AM