I second that. Just if he didnt attack Lewis in the 1st lap!

Yeah, evoHahn, everyone is entitled to their opinions but the British twist and turn theirs every 5 seconds. When Senna or Schumacher do something, it's called gamesmanship or "bending the rules" while when Hamilton does it, the Brits justify it by saying "nice guys finish last" @ "Senna and Schumacher did or would have done the same" @ " he tricked himself an advantage -direct quote from Mark Hughes F1ITV."

Secondly, the hero worship, I still find pathetic. When I read Mark Hughes' article (the one he wrote before the Brazilian GP weekend), he wrote "Forget it, he's already a legend" made me vomit bile. Yet to win anything, ONE GOOD season and he's already a legend. Kononnya.

---

Added on October 22, 2007, 2:08 pmNot to mention, when Ferrari go to FIA, we are sore-losers or being FIA's justice league whereas when McLaren do the same, they are "SEARCHING JUSTICE." I am sick of this to be honest.

I still found Michael's punishment at the Monaco Grand Prix to be bloody harsh. I think it was an innocent mistake. We have seen cars parked there over the years, haven't we? Just because it's Michael, the pre-judgment sets in. I still feel hard done by that decision. I too don't deny we have gotten some, if not many OUR way but I won't complain but just because we have had decisions going our way in the past doesn't mean you can even things out against us for the sake of maintaining "poetic justice."

I too doubt you can disagree that Lewis has gotten some decisions his way. Say what you want about Pit-gate but Lewis should have gotten his punishment by the McLaren team. How was another matter but so much for team-equality if you ask me. Alonso gets a place demotion whereas Lewis gets a slap on the wrist and that's the end of story for him?  Then as for the Brazilian qualifying session, it'd be interesting to see what would happen if it were another driver? 5 place drop?

Every drivers have slip ups during the season. Both Kimi and Lewis had two DNFs and both had their lapses of concentration. Kimi had his in Bahrain and Monaco. Just so happen that Lewis had his late on in the season and Allen and Brundle said that Lewis was hard done by. Sad case. I held their opinion/commentary in high regard. Should have known better when they were over the moon when a Brit was on the podium in a bloody hopeless Honda. 

Is it Ferrari's fault that BMW and Williams ran on cooler fuel?
Do you wants to see Lewis Hamilton wins his championship in court?

If you do, you're the next Ron Dennis Jr.

I'm sure even hamilton doesn't wants the title anymore. There's no point for him to win it that way.
Do you think McLaren will be celebrating if Lewis wins it that way? I don't

The only person who will be happy about it is Ron Dennis.

Mclaren got away the first time too. They too were found guilty of possessing the intellectual properties but not penalize as there was no proof they used the information at that point of time. (many seems to conveniently choose to ignore this)

It is only when Alonso and De La Rosa came forward with their evidence that it became proven beyond doubt that they not only have the information, but they also used it in their simulator.

Renault went to the FIA with that information which again, shows that they have some information and again, no proof that they use it.

So unless someone go forward with proof that shows Renault did something with those information, it will stay at this stage where they will not be punish.

It's all the same thing over again and yet people claim FIA acted differently.

thanks for the input. hopefully vw will let their 'stunning babe@lamborghini' run in F1 soon