huangdi is pendatang, some scholar claim he was from babylon, yandi is native, a miao. basing on this assertion, han chinese was pendatang that conquered china. national anthem during yuan shikai tell clearly chinese ancestry is babylon. some may ask why babylon, at that time, many chinese were whites wannabe, they look down on brown black red and believe whites was the most superior, they feel proud to know that yellow and whites were one family.

correct.

and some chinese always bring out the topic of red indian genocide, they shd asked themselves why the ccp 55 ethnicity have no 匈奴、鲜卑、羌、铁勒、柔然、回纥、突厥、沙陀、党项、 契丹、女真、西夏 etc etc?

This post has been edited by YH1234: Jul 6 2023, 11:29 AM

genocide or assimilated, depending on who you ask.

roc is pirate and bandit like prc.

the best half nazi

read kmt/roc history from 1927 to 1987, they are not that diff with ccp/prc

how and why being absorbed is that diff with most native worldwide including america? so china or usa is not unique, the difference is timing. han chinese shd look at the mirror when accusing the genocide of red indian, and imperialism.

ccp cultivate weed before come to power, macam pas, everything is halal as long as for sake of survive and power.

can, in fact prc comment red indian everyday and every minute as if han chinise is the most suci. the red indian killing happened mostly when there is noy yet a usa, and the mass killling stop at late 19 century, while chinese conquered and colonised tibet and xinjiang in 20th century.

when the cowboy stop shooting red indian on the street, they expect others to do the same. since we know shooting red indian / native is wrong, we blame the one that still do it today, for eg komunis.

that just my hope, look or no look is really not up to me. many chinese in mainland share similar view with mine, just that they cant say it out as freely as us. in fact i learn many things from them.

you take me seriously or no are of absolutely no consequences to me. just that i like to tease you on your poor knowledge on most thing china and chinese.

back to topic, i think frank dikotter wrote a informative book on chinese...the discourse of race in modern china, he also wrote maos great famine. the book essentially tell whats chinese view about chinese from time immemorial (hehehe).

contemporary chinese scholar rarely dare say chinese not origin from yellow river basin, so this egypt thesis sound a bit extraordinary.

white shoot mostly white bother you?

get rid of your hatred, japanese no more wanting to invade taiwan, komunis are.

thats sort of invasion, is wrong, like russian and komunis.

when are you going to tell russian and komunis are wrong?

thats roc and chiang illusion and rhetoric, taiwanese, generally, dont say that anymore except being ironic.

this subject to debate and proper definition. if han chinese killing minority surrounded yellow river basin is deem invasion, then killing red indian is deemed invasion as well. or in malaysia, orang asli also kena invaded by malay chinese indian.

wrong if one follow the theory huangdi was from babylon. chinese is indeed pendatang.

komunis disagree, thay talk since immemorial. and malay also disagree, the constitution say so.