I doubt it, as the shares was held by former wife and will stated to be given to her childrens, since taib is just deemed as estate manager, he has no right to transfer the shares to his current wife, this is assuming the former wife was d owner

Now if taib said he own d shares and d wife was just a proxy and can proof it, then technically he didn't do anything wrong when transferring the shares to his new wife. But of course by doing that, he is admitting his corruption, so i doubt thats d route that will happen

But then again if he has dementia like someone said, then anything goes i guess