i only comment on the logic and reasoning with proves
nothing more nothing less
its akin to you crossing the street at zebra line
and car come barreling at 100kmph
so crossing the road takes around 5-6 strides, and 4 secs to cross
at the start of the 4 sec to cross, the car would be 50m away
thats like a olympic swimming pool away
of course when crossing, you can determine better
but as shown is gmaps, the distance from the stop line to the CCTV location is 10meters
with moto 15kmph @ 4m/s (average out from the stop to max 30kmph at impact)
the time to impact area is 2.5sec
at 2.5sec, the car was 70m away, 70m not enuff time to enter the road?
and some how you forget that moto is also part of a vehicle on the road
this is no different than a car driving past and hitting a moto on a straight road
see above
No need maths so much. If car has to brake for moto entering, it wasn't safe for moto to enter the lane.
Too many only look at who is right or wrong in eyes of the law, ignoring whether you'll be alive after the fact.
Now the moto lady cannot go pangsai ever again, does it matter if she is right? BMW driver can still pangsai in jail.