Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Russia is upgrading its tanks with Arena M

views
     
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 01:01 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


huh seems like ERA didnt do very well if they needed APS
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 09:43 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 07:04 AM)
what happened to Armata? whistling.gif
Patriot: "bring it on"
user posted image
*
already debunked, the one thats shot down is BETAB-500 bomb. look at comparison of the alleged "kinzhal" vs actual


user posted image
user posted image
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 10:24 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 09:59 AM)
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 09:43 AM)

wrong
it matches previous Kinzhal wreckage recovered last year
this is in fact from Russian sources

user posted image
*
bullshit, so youre telling me Klitschko is 6m tall to stand next to a 7m long Kinzhal? doh.gif
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 10:56 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 10:50 AM)
look carefully, the section he's standing next to is only part of the whole missile, in the top right corner of the collage I posted
*
its not even lined the same nor the same size doh.gif

this is how big a Kinzhal is FYI
user posted image
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 11:04 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(mezanny @ May 12 2023, 11:00 AM)
So you think the whole missile is intact when it is shot down ?
*
adoiii another cannot see the difference.. even if its the tip, the shape is already different? thickest point the diameter of kinzhal is 1.2m. so even if its the top part the diameter is still wider than what an average human is

also patriot destroys missile via brute kinetic force, what do you think happens when a patriot travelling at mach 4 hits an incoming kinzhal at mach10? protip, everything will be in pieces
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 11:27 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 11:23 AM)
doh.gif I really have to do this eh?
leading an ass to water...

user posted image
you know this, or you logic with your brain?
because let me tell you, evidence defies ill-informed logic
*
so youre telling me physics taught you when a mach 4 collides with mach 10 and somehow the projectile will retain its shape? doh.gif
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 11:59 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(chaosneo @ May 12 2023, 11:34 AM)
you may need to read on this, it doesn't fly mach 10 all the way.
and the Khinzal is not really a true hypersonic missile. according to popular mechanics site and US think tank, it is more of a ballistic missile than hypersonic due to its inability to maneuver at high speed. 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/w...not-hypersonic/
if it got shot down with its propulsion taken out, there is a good possible chance that it will retain its shape considering the special material it needed to sustain the mark 10 flight at some point.
*
yes thats currently the kinzhal's weakness, intercept it during early-mid launch but the issue is a patriot isnt a long range interceptor

thats why the math doesnt compute. kinzhal boosts "up to" mach 10 only when close to the target. at its top speed of 205km/s (assuming it went into the hypersonic mode) a patriot battery with pac2 missile (160km range) has only seconds to live adjust its trajectory to intercept the kinzhal. also kinzhal is an endo atmospheric type missile which are more unpredictable compared to usual ballistic missile paths

not saying impossible but assuming average 30% interception chance, and UA firing at least 4-6 missiles per kinzhal to increase chances and it can hit. but the main issue is can UA with their limited equip detect kinzhal fast enough for patriot to react? US has multiple early warning systems that does that, UA dont

QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 11:40 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
thats why claims of "up to" but the thing is its still a darn beech to intercept given what UA has even if it goes beyond mach4. US has high success with patriot as they have a multitude of other systems to boost to patriot's accuracy in tracking

not atomise, but be in so many pieces its literally unidentifiable

the kinzhal from 2022 is reported to crash with the MIG-31K, so i dont think its launched even nor is it in hypersonic speeds
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 12:10 PM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(nuvi @ May 12 2023, 12:08 PM)
Notice me senpai! sad.gif
*
just read my damn posts up there
marfccy
post May 12 2023, 12:38 PM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,254 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 12 2023, 12:13 PM)
Kinzhal is CLAIMED by Putin to reach Mach 10, but other sources dismiss this claim on the basis that Iskander on which Kinzhal is based doesn't go that fast; the US rates Kinzhal at around Mach 6

the Kinzhal was probably shot down by a Patriot PAC-3, not PAC-2. PAC-3 has enhanced anti-ballistic missile capabilities and was tested extensively against US ballistic missile targets. the range of the missile itself is not the same as radar tracking time, for the obvious reason that radar has much greater range than a missile, and can be placed in different areas and networked together

the Kinzhal's pathing wouldn't be hard to predict at all because the faster it flies, the longer it takes to change course significantly. anyone who drives should know that. Patriot is designed to intercept a wide range of targets including manoeuvreing fighters
*
yes these are claims, but US CSIS also knew it can reach up to mach 10, thats not something where taht capability can be dismissed entirely

but prob is the pac 3 is too short range vs the longer range pac2 to quickly intercept the incoming? with longer range pac2 they can fire more in advance, intercepting it further before it went into that mode of impossible to intercept. anywho, the key ingredient always has been whether or not UA has enough early detection radar to help the patriot system. if they do then yes they have a chance, but so far i dont see it given how they couldnt intercept previous kinzhals

correct yes, but at same time the danger part is when it can go hypersonic + new pathfinding. think of it like this, if say in my radar i see you approaching north while driving at 100km/hr, and i send out vehicles to intercept you based on your current pathing + speed. suddenly you floor the pedal and changed direction slightly + reaching 300km/h, so what ive informed to the interceptors are now moot and i have to adjust on the fly on your new pathing. problem is do i still have time to adjust? thats why hypersonics are dangerous, cause it really shorten the hell out of the reaction time

it is possible to intercept at almost point blank if during hypersonic phase the patriot fired in time during its final pathing mode but thats too damn close for comfort + much luck involved

QUOTE(nuvi @ May 12 2023, 12:13 PM)
You're theorising so many possibilities yet can't see the damn thing is inside the missile.
*
which i argued back that the kinzhal due to sheer kinetic energy wouldve shattered in pieces if it was indeed hit by patriot?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0193sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 10:12 PM