Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Russia is upgrading its tanks with Arena M

views
     
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 07:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
what happened to Armata? whistling.gif

QUOTE(Etude8891 @ May 12 2023, 01:10 AM)
hypersonic missiles at Kiev.
*
Patriot: "bring it on"
user posted image
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 07:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(judas @ May 12 2023, 07:07 AM)
Too expensive
*
lel

just like Su-57 - so expensive and so awesome that "we didn't need to buy more, what we got is enough to defeat NATO" whistling.gif

Armata is certainly quite expensive, for a bunch of parade floats...
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 07:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(WinkyJr @ May 12 2023, 07:08 AM)
fake news
according to media and /k, all RU tanks already destroyed in UA
*
according to Russian media and /k, Ukraine Air Force entirely destroyed by February 26, 2022

TASS says 421 AFU aircraft have been destroyed
pretty impressive for a country that started with less than 200, all types.
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 08:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(oe_kintaro @ May 12 2023, 07:39 AM)
RuAF functions exactly like a dysfunctional corporation where departments and functions compete against each other instead of working together, and prioritize/ inflate their own department KPIs to the detriment of the larger org.
*
well in this case it is TASS simply making up bullshit biggrin.gif

as for the Russian Air Force, the RUSI report is very illuminating on their operational shortcomings, you should check it out. TL;DR attempts were made, but in a haphazard and occasionally lepaskan batuk di tangga, makan gaji fashion.
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 09:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 09:43 AM)

wrong
it matches previous Kinzhal wreckage recovered last year
this is in fact from Russian sources

user posted image

This post has been edited by KLthinker91: May 12 2023, 09:59 AM
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 10:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 10:24 AM)

bullshit, so youre telling me Klitschko is 6m tall to stand next to a 7m long Kinzhal?  doh.gif
*
look carefully, the section he's standing next to is only part of the whole missile, in the top right corner of the collage I posted
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 11:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 10:56 AM)
its not even lined the same nor the same size

*
doh.gif I really have to do this eh?
leading an ass to water...

user posted image

QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 11:04 AM)

everything will be in pieces
*
you know this, or you logic with your brain?
because let me tell you, evidence defies ill-informed logic
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 11:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 11:27 AM)
so youre telling me physics taught you when a mach 4 collides with mach 10 and somehow the projectile will retain its shape?  doh.gif
*
more like Mach 3+ and Mach 6
Kinzhal is not as fast as Putin claims

US military thinking has always stated that missile intercepts can still cause significant damage from fragments. the intercept can destroy the weapon, throw it off course, or damage its fuze so it doesn't explode - such as here - but large fragments remain

a glancing blow especially would be enough to damage the Kinzhal sufficiently so that it tears itself apart but into discrete pieces

besides, as the picture of the recovered Kinzhal from 2022 shows, Kinzhal can slam into the ground at Mach 6 (or less) and retain recognisable fragments

what, did you imagine that the weapon would literally atomise?
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 12:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 11:59 AM)

kinzhal boosts "up to" mach 10 only when close to the target. at its top speed of 205km/s (assuming it went into the hypersonic mode) a patriot battery with pac2 missile (160km range) has only seconds to live adjust its trajectory to intercept the kinzhal. also kinzhal is an endo atmospheric type missile which are more unpredictable compared to usual ballistic missile paths

*
Kinzhal is CLAIMED by Putin to reach Mach 10, but other sources dismiss this claim on the basis that Iskander on which Kinzhal is based doesn't go that fast; the US rates Kinzhal at around Mach 6

the Kinzhal was probably shot down by a Patriot PAC-3, not PAC-2. PAC-3 has enhanced anti-ballistic missile capabilities and was tested extensively against US ballistic missile targets. the range of the missile itself is not the same as radar tracking time, for the obvious reason that radar has much greater range than a missile, and can be placed in different areas and networked together

the Kinzhal's pathing wouldn't be hard to predict at all because the faster it flies, the longer it takes to change course significantly. anyone who drives should know that. Patriot is designed to intercept a wide range of targets including manoeuvreing fighters
KLthinker91
post May 12 2023, 01:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
227 posts

Joined: Feb 2019
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(marfccy @ May 12 2023, 12:38 PM)
yes these are claims, but US CSIS also knew it can reach up to mach 10
CSIS is a civilian nonprofit think tank, it compiles data
in this case, the Mach 10 claim is from Russian statements
which sorry to say, has been mostly indah khabar dari rupa so far (Su-57, Armata, Lider, etc)

QUOTE
the key ingredient always has been whether or not UA has enough early detection radar to help the patriot system. if they do then yes they have a chance, but so far i dont see it given how they couldnt intercept previous kinzhals

true
well, the IADS network now continues to build up with more NATO batteries being delivered, thus coverage is expanding

QUOTE
correct yes, but at same time the danger part is when it can go hypersonic + new pathfinding.
...
thats why hypersonics are dangerous, cause it really shorten the hell out of the reaction time

yes, but Kinzhal is not a "true" hypersonic
one way to describe it is ballistically hypersonic vs manoeuvreing hypersonic

"manouevreing hypersonic" is as you say, can pull of manoeuvres while at Mach 5+. very few existing weapons can do this. the only Russian weapon claimed to be manouevreing hypersonic is Avangard.

"ballistically hypersonic" doesn't manouevre at Mach 5. either it slows down to manoeuvre, or its path is basically straight down (Ballistic). all ballistic weapons do this. the first ballistically hypersonic weapon is 80 years old - Nazi Germany's V-2 rocket.

QUOTE
it is possible to intercept at almost point blank if during hypersonic phase the patriot fired in time during its final pathing mode but thats too damn close for comfort + much luck involved
*
luck always plays a part
but in this case, it seems that one way or another, the Kinzhal entered the Patriot's engagement envelope

for what it's worth, the USA claims to corroborate Ukraine's account:
"I'm not going to get into the specifics or trying to characterize it, other than, again, to say we can confirm that the Ukrainians took down this Russian missile with a Patriot missile defense system."
although it is unclear whether the missile was launched by a US-donated Patriot or a Dutch-donated Patriot

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0226sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:07 AM