So Rafizi's defense is honest opinion/fair comment on the basis of true sets of facts. 😊

If you read between the lines

Rafizi accused Sharmil of taking 1 billion.
Sharil's lawyer refuted saying officially ceo's renumeration is 400 million (did not say anything about other income). 🥰

Rafizi while standing for defense did not claim what he said are statement of facts, instead he said his word are honest opinion.
Statement of facts give strongest defense in defamation. But of course he did not use that because he does not have evidence to prove it. 😊
I think he really need those documents.

These people. Somehow.

This post has been edited by Sycamore: May 4 2023, 11:42 AM