Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
‘Park At Your Own Risk’ no longer applicable
|
xander2k8
|
 Apr 28 2023, 07:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Thebestscammer @ Apr 28 2023, 07:37 PM) if you have to pay for the parking then they are liable. if its some free lot that some guy owns but he lets you park for free then kasi chan la, deal with the theft and issue on your own Difficult to prove these days which cashless parking 🤦♀️ as they don’t state whose the parking operator The only thing they can prove is the entry and exit time and building |
|
|
|
|
|
xander2k8
|
Apr 29 2023, 02:07 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Buffalo Soldier @ Apr 28 2023, 08:50 PM) Usually this is done during the disclosure/discovery phase (pre-trial). All parties must all the documents that any party intends to rely on or refer to during the trial later. At that phase... Any contract/agreement between the building/mall/hotel owner with the parking operator should come to light. Only those who is willing drag to court But I am sure most would go to a tribunal 1st to settle before dragging it out to court |
|
|
|
|
|
xander2k8
|
Apr 29 2023, 03:27 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Cincai lar @ Apr 29 2023, 02:46 PM) Tribunal is not a court and it is different 🤦♀️ The tribunal can be a party to the dispute, whereas a court cannot be a party to the dispute. Tribunal is to settle dispute amicably with win win situation at best 🤦♀️ while court is to decide only single party to win 🤦♀️ Do you think why ppl like to settle cases outside of court instead 🤦♀️ |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0172sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled