It's not recent at all. The ruling has been around like 15 to 20 years ago provided it's a paid parking. Iinm, one of the case was  a mall parking somewhere in KL. Was it imbi plaza, I can't recall. Car owner managed to get compensation for items in his car that was missing together with his car (car got stolen). The car itself is insured so parking lot operator didn't have to compensate the car itself . It was in the news when I was a student. Circa 1995-1999.

Free parking on the other hand yes, parking owner can be exempted from liabilities. I recall years ago got a case where car owner sues Tesco for damages his car suffered while being parked at Tesco parking lot. The court sided with Tesco as the parking area is free for all.

parking kena hit and run,.. can claim or not ??

Can we sue majlis bandaraya since we paid parking fees?

Depends where you park la and how you park. Also if you know who hit and run.

so car stolen who will be responsible？

Can we sue majlis bandaraya since we paid parking fees?

it's already a thing after a judge ruled it a few years ago
but parking operator still love to put the term behind their ticket or on the wall of the parking as if it's legal binding

unless of course your parking is free...thn yes

Difficult to prove these days which cashless parking 🤦‍♀️ as they don’t state whose the parking operator

The only thing they can prove is the entry and exit time and building

if you have to pay for the parking then they are liable.
if its some free lot that some guy owns but he lets you park for free then kasi chan la, deal with the theft and issue on your own