Asus Maximus Formula Special Edition Test

Lowyat.NET forums

Lowyat.NET Kopitiam Garage Sales

Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations FAQ Help Search Members

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Lowyat.NET -> Overclockers United

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Asus Maximus Formula Special Edition Test, OC results - Hunt for 24/7 setup

views

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 12:12 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #41
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	QUOTE(lolhalol @ Oct 18 2007, 11:26 AM) bro wat u mean by this eh? reproducable? just because u are loaded with money deosnt mean we all are.. if u are willing to buy us the gfx tehn we dun mind at all.. till then just shut it aobut team koc ok.. wats did team ever do to u...? and reproduceable on which score? most of our runs are thru dryice.. adn are highly reproduceble..with super pi.. if u have even benched with suiper pi u knw that witht he same clocks u might not get teh same time... as u said google is a powerfull tool... QUOTE most of our runs are thru dryice.. adn are highly reproduceble..with super pi. vs QUOTE if u have even benched with suiper pi u knw that witht he same clocks u might not get teh same time i rest me case PS. i get THE SAMe RESULTS EVERYTIME. Added on October 18, 2007, 11:28 am 500fsb on wat chip ? quad? afaik een my super lowend ip35-e can do 500fsb out of the box... wats so special but 500.. if its 600 tehn i might be impressed.. but 500 again X6800 not so easy... unless u go like extreme cooling... and for quad if u can do 500 out of the box prove it... till then shut it. all talk and no show makes u like kindda stupid. dont make this into another 2900pro thread plss.. anyways updated with some quad core benching more benchies result keep the fat kids away. 4ghz will try to do later as i have to work today. Take note from now on can u guy actually back up ure statements if u want to say x6800 can do 500fsb on normal boards.. POST LINKS if u want to claim q6600 can do 500fsb out of the box on ure fatty lowend ip35 prove it. if u want to say u can reproduce ure results then show it. and then also dont contradict the statement by saying that ure superpi will always differ. Mine doesnt and u better realize it is a sign if instability.Heck all my clocks i post are sp 32m stable, memtest 3 rounds passed. y?? cause it gives a better benchies with the 3dmark and aquamark till then shut it. gpu benchies?? dude if u can type here and have some lowend mobo .. some graphic card must be running on it right?? also i thought some of ure members had a hd2900xt?? UPDATE SOME more quad core benchies. will post some e6850 benchies later. This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 18 2007, 12:21 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

extremeocer	Oct 18 2007, 12:20 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #42
Casual Junior Member 302 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor	QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 18 2007, 12:12 PM) vs i rest me case PS. i get THE SAMe RESULTS EVERYTIME. Added on October 18, 2007, 11:28 am 500fsb on wat chip ? quad? afaik een my super lowend ip35-e can do 500fsb out of the box... wats so special but 500.. if its 600 tehn i might be impressed.. but 500 again X6800 not so easy... unless u go like extreme cooling... and for quad if u can do 500 out of the box prove it... till then shut it. all talk and no show makes u like kindda stupid. dont make this into another 2900pro thread plss.. anyways updated with some quad core benching more benchies result keep the fat kids away. 4ghz will try to do later as i have to work today. Take note from now on can u guy actually back up ure statements if u want to say x6800 can do 500fsb on normal boards.. POST LINKS if u want to claim q6600 can do 500fsb out of the box on ure fatty lowend ip35 prove it. if u want to say u can reproduce ure results then show it. and then also dont contradict the statement by saying that ure superpi will always differ. Mine doesnt and u better realize it is a sign if instability.Heck all my clocks i post are sp 32m stable, memtest 3 rounds passed. y?? cause it gives a better benchies with the 3dmark and aquamark till then shut it. UPDATE SOME more quad core benchies. will post some e6850 benchies later. bro, not that i wanna argue with you and stuff. First and foremost, i NEVER said x6800 clocks good on air, did i? I mentioned time and time again that cooling is the fact here. If i have a x6800 with me now, you would have shut it long ago. Same goes for a Quad. You always say out the box....what the hell. Why are so many people using Phase Change and cascades then. The point is that it gives you High OC. If you have a Phase change , not to mention cascade, you see the point yourself. Its really that simple. This post has been edited by extremeocer: Oct 18 2007, 12:22 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 12:24 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #43
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « [QUOTE][quote=extremeocer,Oct 18 2007, 12:20 PM] again X6800 not so easy... unless u go like extreme cooling... and for quad if u can do 500 out of the box prove it... till then shut it. all talk and no show makes u like kindda stupid. dont make this into another 2900pro thread plss.. anyways updated with some quad core benching more benchies result keep the fat kids away. 4ghz will try to do later as i have to work today. Take note from now on can u guy actually back up ure statements if u want to say x6800 can do 500fsb on normal boards.. POST LINKS if u want to claim q6600 can do 500fsb out of the box on ure fatty lowend ip35 prove it. if u want to say u can reproduce ure results then show it. and then also dont contradict the statement by saying that ure superpi will always differ. Mine doesnt and u better realize it is a sign if instability.Heck all my clocks i post are sp 32m stable, memtest 3 rounds passed. y?? cause it gives a better benchies with the 3dmark and aquamark till then shut it. UPDATE SOME more quad core benchies. will post some e6850 benchies later. [/quote] bro, not that i wanna argue with you and stuff. First and foremost, i NEVER said x6800 clocks good on air, did i? I mentioned time and time again that cooling is the fact here. If i have a x6800 with me now, you would have shut it long ago. Same goes for a Quad. You always say out the box....what the hell. Why are so many people using Phase Change and cascades then. The point is that it gives you High OC. If you have a Phase change , not to mention cascade, you see the point yourself. Its really that simple. [/quote] [/QUOTE] no bro the statement yesterday was out of frust. anyways post relevent statements shall i suddenly come to a thread and say hey i can do 8ghz 700fsb?? when u know the benchies are at a watercooling level. To everybody: if u want to say something post relevent statements with similar cooling or state ure cooling for the bus speeds with some spuerpi32m scores etc like how i post. till then all this sounds rubbish. if u say ure p35 can beat this mobo then prove it with a similar setup at a similar ghz since u can overhit them. then it shouldnt be a problem dont make this into a kopitiam thread This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 18 2007, 12:26 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

extremeocer	Oct 18 2007, 12:30 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #44
Casual Junior Member 302 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor	QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 18 2007, 12:24 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « bro, not that i wanna argue with you and stuff. First and foremost, i NEVER said x6800 clocks good on air, did i? I mentioned time and time again that cooling is the fact here. If i have a x6800 with me now, you would have shut it long ago. Same goes for a Quad. You always say out the box....what the hell. Why are so many people using Phase Change and cascades then. The point is that it gives you High OC. If you have a Phase change , not to mention cascade, you see the point yourself. Its really that simple. no bro the statement yesterday was out of frust. anyways post relevent statements shall i suddenly come to a thread and say hey i can do 8ghz 700fsb?? when u know the benchies are at a watercooling level. i understand your frustration. But i did post a screenie of high OC with sub-zero cooling. I am definitely not talk-only person. Wish i had a x6800 or a quad, then you can see it for yourself. Hope you understand that i am not saying the Maximus is a lousy board, that any boards can rival it. I can't deny its a good board indeed. 500FSB is really something but if you want further OC....then you gotta have extra cooling. I shall stop here bro. Really no offends. Perhaps we can meet to pair up your rig with my cascade...now thats gonna make it fly like hell. This post has been edited by extremeocer: Oct 18 2007, 12:33 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

lolhalol	Oct 18 2007, 12:31 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #45
Showroom Skateboarding Senior Member 1,823 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur	bro super pi will always differ... u wont see it if u run twice or three times.. , u knw why opb was called a cheater? coz his spi times were insanely fast beyond logicall reasoning for that clocks peed.. u knw how he did it.. he just ran spi 100 times and picked the fastest... its a stated bug, not instablity.... and by the way... some x6800 doing 500 fsb... http://www.csd.dficlub.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2159 http://www.awardfabrik.de/forum/showthread.php?t=725
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

coolice	Oct 18 2007, 12:44 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #46
Team OCD! Senior Member 1,857 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: ocdrift.com	flame war pulak btw,cstkl1,ur 570fsb chip still with u?mind to test the sandra bandwidth for me?just curious how does it compare with dq6,this board looks damn nice 560x7 1:1 4-4-4-4
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 12:49 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #47
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	QUOTE(coolice @ Oct 18 2007, 12:44 PM) flame war pulak btw,cstkl1,ur 570fsb chip still with u?mind to test the sandra bandwidth for me?just curious how does it compare with dq6,this board looks damn nice 560x7 1:1 4-4-4-4 no wei .. kekek got an amkong result with the x6800. when i first got the board i just taruk 570.. and geee it worked..kekeke after than it didnt anymore... maybe proc happy to be in new mobo and was over excited. thats y i going to use a e6850 to bench ram capabilities. still sian leh that havent settled the 4ghz qx6600 benching. this mobo loves my team rams... compared to my 680 which practically hates it. looking for some d9gkx later. since my geil rams had to rma Geil Ultra PLus 1160 Cl4 Paid a bomb for these Worked for 30mins Failed memtest on 2 mobos at rated speeds and jedec speeds - Priceless... i just want ppl who post on this thread show a similar benchmark with a similar proc before they talk some rubbish bro dont u find a lot of posting here like claiming this and that but like damn kopitiam only already the hardware section is like no difference than low yat plaza hardware selling kopitiam style new gpu comes in everybody like expressing their hope that it will be the king of the world.. early benches come in they all like excited when it hits the shelves they dont buy??and then will say like this and that after a few months the price drop will change their mind with something else or like start all over again with some new gpu thats about to be launched. then i pulak kena for being rude and hurt some poor kids heart that he cannot sleep at night This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 18 2007, 12:53 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

coolice	Oct 18 2007, 01:00 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #48
Team OCD! Senior Member 1,857 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: ocdrift.com	QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 18 2007, 12:49 PM) no wei .. kekek got an amkong result with the x6800. when i first got the board i just taruk 570.. and geee it worked..kekeke after than it didnt anymore... maybe proc happy to be in new mobo and was over excited. thats y i going to use a e6850 to bench ram capabilities. still sian leh that havent settled the 4ghz qx6600 benching. this mobo loves my team rams... compared to my 680 which practically hates it. looking for some d9gkx later. since my geil rams had to rma Geil Ultra PLus 1160 Cl4 Paid a bomb for these Worked for 30mins Failed memtest on 2 mobos at rated speeds and jedec speeds - Priceless... i just want ppl who post on this thread show a similar benchmark with a similar proc before they talk some rubbish bro dont u find a lot of posting here like claiming this and that but like damn kopitiam only already the hardware section is like no difference than low yat plaza hardware selling kopitiam style new gpu comes in everybody like expressing their hope that it will be the king of the world.. early benches come in they all like excited when it hits the shelves they dont buy??and then will say like this and that after a few months the price drop will change their mind with something else or like start all over again with some new gpu thats about to be launched. then i pulak kena for being rude and hurt some poor kids heart that he cannot sleep at night u r hokkien also? amkong pulak and qx66 or qx68?..zzz..lol..y get tat geil?coz i hardly see ppl get it,u r the first,from the ramlist reported it is d9gct ya..current lyn unlike few yr back
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

rlhc17	Oct 18 2007, 01:28 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #49
Enthusiast Senior Member 835 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: LYP@Bintang Walk	Xtreme cooling = Xtreme oc some low end mobo can go xtreme level too but it won't last long.....
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

sup3rfly	Oct 18 2007, 02:12 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #50
Techno Slave Senior Member 1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街	from the start til now u all still confuse with cstkl's statement la....he is talking about 500 fsb for X68 is consider high.... and u guys go and compare it with E66... and cstkl about ur statement earlier i will take it as an advice, i m currently playing with the mobo just got it yday only gimme some time i will do some comparisons and benchmark...as for graphic benchmark i really no graphic cards to bench only using 6600GT oni lolx.... didnt concentrate much on graphic benching coz graphic card is too expensive and the new chips, cant really chase after when i think its time for me to get the one i wanted then new chip came out i think darksythe knows what i meant lol This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Oct 18 2007, 02:15 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

Quazacolt	Oct 18 2007, 02:18 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #51
Riding couple Senior Member 5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia	» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 18 2007, 12:49 PM) no wei .. kekek got an amkong result with the x6800. when i first got the board i just taruk 570.. and geee it worked..kekeke after than it didnt anymore... maybe proc happy to be in new mobo and was over excited. thats y i going to use a e6850 to bench ram capabilities. still sian leh that havent settled the 4ghz qx6600 benching. this mobo loves my team rams... compared to my 680 which practically hates it. looking for some d9gkx later. since my geil rams had to rma Geil Ultra PLus 1160 Cl4 Paid a bomb for these Worked for 30mins Failed memtest on 2 mobos at rated speeds and jedec speeds - Priceless... i just want ppl who post on this thread show a similar benchmark with a similar proc before they talk some rubbish bro dont u find a lot of posting here like claiming this and that but like damn kopitiam only already the hardware section is like no difference than low yat plaza hardware selling kopitiam style new gpu comes in everybody like expressing their hope that it will be the king of the world.. early benches come in they all like excited when it hits the shelves they dont buy??and then will say like this and that after a few months the price drop will change their mind with something else or like start all over again with some new gpu thats about to be launched. then i pulak kena for being rude and hurt some poor kids heart that he cannot sleep at night QFT on this lmao look at the hardware Q&A now, people asking for hardware they reply with financial advice... damn funny id say. btw nice mobo and benchies you got there. the x38 is really performing as opposed to the supposedly enthusiast based nvidia's 680. have you compared graphic benchies (maybe use 3dmark 05 or below as they are less cpu/mobo/ram reliant?) between x38 and the 680? reason for the curiousity is due to the 680 coming from nvidia, theoretically it should have better results with their own graphic cards (unless ur gonna bench with ATI's card)
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 02:23 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #52
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 18 2007, 02:12 PM) from the start til now u all still confuse with cstkl's statement la....he is talking about 500 fsb for X68 is consider high.... and u guys go and compare it with E66... and cstkl about ur statement earlier i will take it as an advice, i m currently playing with the mobo just got it yday only gimme some time i will do some comparisons and benchmark...as for graphic benchmark i really no graphic cards to bench only using 6600GT oni lolx.... didnt concentrate much on graphic benching coz graphic card is too expensive and the new chips, cant really chase after when i think its time for me to get the one i wanted then new chip came out i think darksythe knows what i meant lol true bro but do at aquamark and 3dmark06 just to show potential of cpu/rams on this puppy the aquamark u can post a similar benches on other system on the same gpu with my 680 i can dream larr to hit 204k at 3.56ghz for aqua. all this on a GTs..sishh no wonder Kingpin i think broke the aquamark with this mobo at 290k i think. Added on October 18, 2007, 2:28 pm QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Oct 18 2007, 02:18 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QFT on this lmao look at the hardware Q&A now, people asking for hardware they reply with financial advice... damn funny id say. btw nice mobo and benchies you got there. the x38 is really performing as opposed to the supposedly enthusiast based nvidia's 680. have you compared graphic benchies (maybe use 3dmark 05 or below as they are less cpu/mobo/ram reliant?) between x38 and the 680? reason for the curiousity is due to the 680 coming from nvidia, theoretically it should have better results with their own graphic cards (unless ur gonna bench with ATI's card) hmm dude actually nvidia mobo's usually have better bandwidths on their mem controllers and southbridge. hence their graphic scores better as it is not being bottlenecked much since this mobo supports pcie2.0 which means that the southbridge can take more bandwidth.. so not too sure about that but the benches just now was to show the strengths of the cpu 3dmark05 comparison was for u to draw your own conclusions as didnt bench 3dmark05 for a long time already kekek.. and y i asked team KOC not to offend them but if u guys start doing more gpu benchies this mobo is going to score some serious points for u. thats all doesnt matter what gpu it is. This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 18 2007, 02:28 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

sup3rfly	Oct 18 2007, 02:46 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #53
Techno Slave Senior Member 1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街	okie i will run the benchmarks as well but warn u guys 1st it will be freaking low scores!!!! i believe aquamark involve with graphics as well so i dont think i will be getting sky high score on it.... now looking for ram max speed at 1t... so far DDR900 4-4-4-4 @ 2.4v, bios set as 2.3, will try 4-4-4-8 and 5-5-5-12 later dun think 1T will help much tho here is some screenie of a super low clock comparison of super pi 1m xD This post has been edited by sup3rfly: Oct 18 2007, 02:52 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

Quazacolt	Oct 18 2007, 02:51 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #54
Riding couple Senior Member 5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia	QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 18 2007, 02:46 PM) okie i will run the benchmarks as well but warn u guys 1st it will be freaking low scores!!!! i believe aquamark involve with graphics as well so i dont think i will be getting sky high score on it.... now looking for ram max speed at 1t... so far DDR900 4-4-4-4 @ 2.4v, bios set as 2.3, will try 4-4-4-8 and 5-5-5-12 later dun think 1T will help much tho here is some screenie of a super low clock comparison of super pi 1m xD [img=http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/4967/1txz2.th.jpg] on the bright side, since ur gfx card is old, most likely it wont face any bottlenecking and thus the results can be more "authentic" if you get what i mean
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

sup3rfly	Oct 18 2007, 02:53 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #55
Techno Slave Senior Member 1,561 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: 秋葉原電気街	well i suppose so.... the scores is gained mostly by the proc and ram not graphic anymore if thats what u meant
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

Quazacolt	Oct 18 2007, 02:54 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #56
Riding couple Senior Member 5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia	QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 18 2007, 02:53 PM) well i suppose so.... the scores is gained mostly by the proc and ram not graphic anymore if thats what u meant yeah which is why i mentioned 3dmark 05 earlier. 06 is very reliant on cpu and mem (especially cpu). even a 50-100 mhz difference can affect few hundred points on 3dmark06 for my benches.
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 05:13 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #57
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(lolhalol @ Oct 18 2007, 12:31 PM) bro super pi will always differ... u wont see it if u run twice or three times.. , u knw why opb was called a cheater? coz his spi times were insanely fast beyond logicall reasoning for that clocks peed.. u knw how he did it.. he just ran spi 100 times and picked the fastest... its a stated bug, not instablity.... and by the way... some x6800 doing 500 fsb... http://www.csd.dficlub.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2159 http://www.awardfabrik.de/forum/showthread.php?t=725 ok and u seriously think that was on a air cooling or water cooling on a unmodded mobo?? ok one link...somemore?? dude u dont have to post the pics.. just give the links... if u can give 10-20 till then just accept it as a godly fact that u never had a x6800 to test with so u have no clue what ure talking about. dont make this is kopitiam shall i say all procs can do 700fsb... and then u argue back with me saying oh yeah i meant on god mother l2n cooling with some experimental drugs injected into me at the north pole?? i find this topic of x6800 doing 500fsb u guys just dont get it so far only superfly gets it. again and for the last time IT IS RARE FOR X6800 to do fsb 500 on a unmoded mobo with air/water This post has been edited by cstkl1: Oct 18 2007, 05:18 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

gengstapo	Oct 18 2007, 05:18 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #58
Retired enthusiast All Stars 10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005	QUOTE(sup3rfly @ Oct 18 2007, 02:46 PM) okie i will run the benchmarks as well but warn u guys 1st it will be freaking low scores!!!! i believe aquamark involve with graphics as well so i dont think i will be getting sky high score on it.... now looking for ram max speed at 1t... so far DDR900 4-4-4-4 @ 2.4v, bios set as 2.3, will try 4-4-4-8 and 5-5-5-12 later dun think 1T will help much tho here is some screenie of a super low clock comparison of super pi 1m xD aiyaaa.. oledi jump into aquamark ady arhh? dont larii topic lerr btw, aquamark depend mostly on GFx
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

TScstkl1	Oct 18 2007, 05:23 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #59
Look at all my stars!! Elite 6,799 posts Joined: Jan 2003	QUOTE(gengstapo @ Oct 18 2007, 05:18 PM) aiyaaa.. oledi jump into aquamark ady arhh? dont larii topic lerr btw, aquamark depend mostly on GFx no bro.. wrong that was before c2d after that ppl could actually balance out the system example was my post... do u think that the gts was the contributing factor for 217k at 4ghz??
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

DaRkSyThE	Oct 18 2007, 07:10 PM Show posts by this member only \| Post #60
Look at all my stars!! VIP 4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005	im going to make this very clear. lets be humans and let whoever wants to kill each other do it somewhere else sheesh. there is really no point here because what one says will be shot down by another person. if this thread is going to be a flamming thread, then there is really no point in having this around. i apologize if i have offended anyone here but we are all lowyat.net forumers. we all learn from each other, not kill each other with words edited. wrong people added in This post has been edited by DaRkSyThE: Oct 18 2007, 07:20 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

« Next Oldest · Overclockers United · Next Newest »

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top

Topic ClosedOptions

Change to:

0.0222sec

0.30

6 queries

GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 07:49 PM

All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)

Removal Request

Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.