Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 What to buy for a 200-250k budget?, House or Condo?

views
     
dreamer101
post Nov 28 2007, 10:09 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gtghost @ Oct 11 2007, 12:25 PM)
Dear all,

Do you have any recommendation for the budget above? I discussed with my friends and parents, parents prefer me to look around Kepong area. I'm open to any suggestions. My repayment target is around 5-10 years. I'm planning to take out around 50k from the EPF to pay for it.

It may be for living or renting out as I am staying with my parents. They are happy and do not mind me staying. So, this will either be investment or for self usage once I'm married. Nyway, have already decided that I will go for property investment to diversify my investment.

Any suggestion or feedback or critisim is very appreciated tongue.gif
*
gtghost,

How do you come up a budget of 200K to 250K?? And, if you have a budget of 200K to 250K, you cannot afford a house that is price at 200K to 250K. The reason is there are additional costs associated in buying and straying in a house.

For example, it costs on the average of 30K to move in a house. So, just by deducting 30K, you can only afford a house that is 170K to 220K. Plus, we have not factored in ALL other costs.

How much monthly loan payment can you pay per month?? For example, you should not pay MORE than 25% of your monthly gross income on house.

The point that I am trying to bring up is you have not done a proper calculation to find out how much house can you afford. And, the house that you lived in is NOT AN INVESTMENT. It is a LIABILITY.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Nov 29 2007, 12:17 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(tinkerbel @ Nov 29 2007, 07:50 AM)
@dreamer101,
The house we live in, if paid up and owned should be seen as an ASSET, and not a liability.
*
tinkerbel,

That is YOUR OPINION. And, it is not share by me and many others in our wealth building path. We judge an asset by cash flow.

An asset is something that give you money every month. The house that you live in does not give you money every month unless you rent it out. In fact, you have to pay money every month to maintain your house. It is an expense. And, it does not matter how much the house is appreciated. It means nothing until you sell it. And, when you sell the house that you live in, you have to buy or rent another to live in.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Nov 29 2007, 08:16 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(tinkerbel @ Nov 29 2007, 04:01 PM)
@b00n,
If it belongs to u, it's an Asset.  Who said assets only appreciates.  Car's an asset which depreciates in value.
*
tinkerbel,

1) That is YOUR OPINION and YOUR WAY of looking at things. And, you are what you believe. IMHO, anything that does not generate positive cash flow is NOT an asset.

2) In your system of belief, when you buy something and you own it aka even a TV, you think you have an asset and your net worth is increasing. In my system of belief, anything that does not make money for me is not an asset. So, between you and me, who is going to spend more money on things that does not make money?? You or me?? You are what you believe.


Dreamer

dreamer101
post Nov 29 2007, 10:15 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(yewkhuay @ Nov 29 2007, 09:42 PM)
she is right , asset may or may not generate $$/ appreciate
u r right.
something tht u own tht generate $$ / appreciate , when it depreciate or require ur $$ to maintain it, it become liability. put it this way, when u bring business to ur employer, u r an good asset ,but when u r not efficient anymore n company still pay u ur salary , u r liability...

car used as taxi = asset , car tht keep as weekend car n paying instalment = liability , 50yrs old car tht Tunku Abdul Rahman owned n passed down to my grand father n he pass to me is an invaluable asset , i pay $$ money to maintain n keep it shinny, liability.
*
yewkhuay,

1) Average people are not rich and rich people are not average. You have a choice. You can choose to be average or rich. You cannot be both.

2) Rich people do not look at things the same as average people. And, they are NOT limited or use the definition of normal people.

3) My definition of asset is based on cash flow basis. Anything that does not generate positive cash flow is NOT an asset.

4) In my book, appreciation is NOT REAL. It is not cash flow. Until you can sell that thing and get some money, it is ALL PAPER PROFIT.

So, do you want to be RIGHT or RICH. And, that is the question. Normal and average people use definition and way of looking at thing that cause them to waste money as opposed to using money to generate wealth.

I would rather be RICH than RIGHT.

Dreamer

This post has been edited by dreamer101: Nov 29 2007, 10:15 PM
dreamer101
post Nov 30 2007, 02:52 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Nov 29 2007, 10:28 PM)
We can always right and rich at the same time. Definition of asset is not important, if u know how to make money.
*
jasontoh,

You have contradicted yourself.

<<Definition of asset is not important, if u know how to make money.>>

If you believe this, then, being right is irrelevant to you. You only care about making money.

<<We can always right and rich at the same time.>

If you believe in this, then, you do not believe definition of asset is not important.

Which one do you choose?? What is more important to you??

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Dec 1 2007, 08:50 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(yewkhuay @ Nov 30 2007, 10:46 PM)
Dreamer,

read my post carefully , i was commenting tinkerbel is right at her point of view, i didn't agree with anyone on which is asset n which is liability, It can be both at the same time if one doesn't handle it properly. asset provide $$ , liability doesn't , regardless wat it is, can be the same thing.

not sure wat r u trying to tell me in 1) n 2) if u r replying to my post. i m not rich in my definition , neither average at most of my peer's definition. right or wrong to me it doesn't matter, it's all POV, but from the way i see it, u r the one who is always mentioning others are wrong.
*
yewkhuay,

<<read my post carefully , i was commenting tinkerbel is right at her point of view, >>

You do not get IT. My POV is that kind of POV will not help a person to get rich. And, it is HARMFUL in the path of gathering wealth. A person's POV shape what a person believe. And, that determines whether a person is average or
rich.

You are what you believe.

Dreamer
dreamer101
post Dec 5 2007, 09:40 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,855 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Pai @ Dec 3 2007, 02:44 PM)
but yet you think its the right POV to gain weallth? Care to explain more? smile.gif
*
Pai,

1) Only cash flow positive investment are assets. Anything else are liabilities.

2) House that you lived in is liability unless you rent part of your house out and it is cash flow positive./

In USA as for many in Malaysia too, people think that the house that they live in is an asset. Because of that flawed thinking, they spent TOO MUCH on the house that they live in and tied up most ofl their money. So, the house is the only "ASSET" that they have. They are house rich and have nothing else.

Dreamer

This post has been edited by dreamer101: Dec 5 2007, 10:17 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0209sec    1.05    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 01:50 AM