Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Ryan's workout journal (New Target!), Measurement in my first post

views
     
jones007
post Oct 10 2007, 03:30 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


of course u increase your intensity always. doing the same thing aint gonna help. its common sense
jones007
post Nov 1 2007, 11:01 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


10% of fat los? means u lost 8kg of fat, and gained 3 kg of muscle. CONGRATS! looking good there mate.

u know what? u must take a before and after picture. keep it to yourself. u'll enjoy it very much later on hahaha
jones007
post Nov 2 2007, 12:44 AM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


QUOTE(ryansxs @ Nov 1 2007, 11:07 PM)
Yeah 10% fat loss. Thanx bro.
Yeah i will try to take a pic. My aim is to achieve 75kgs asap.
*
dude whats your height again? don rush things too much and dont bother too much on your bodyweight. its the fats that matters. being at 75kg and 30% of body fat is not gonna make u look any better.
jones007
post Nov 2 2007, 10:14 AM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


why weight training > cardio in burning fat.

QUOTE
Not Lifting Things Off the Floor

I'm not going to go into a diatribe on EPOC (Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption) and its role on fat loss. Okay I lied. I am going to go into a diatribe. It's my article so deal with it.

If you haven't learned by now that "intense" resistance training is FAR superior compared to long duration aerobics or steady-state cardiovascular exercise in terms of TOTAL caloric expenditure in a 24-48 hour period, than you shouldn't be surprised that you still have the "skinny-fat" look.

It's quite the paradox, because if we compared a 45-minute cardio session to a 45 minute resistance training session, you're apt to burn more calories minute-to-minute doing cardio than you are lifting weights. That's why most people are under the assumption that cardio burns more calories overall and is the most efficient approach to fat loss (along with restricting calories drastically too low). However, what many trainees don't take into consideration is EPOC, which are the calories you burn AFTER you train.

What is often neglected is the fact that you have to look at total caloric expenditure in a 24 hour period, NOT just what you do while at the gym. How many calories you burn during a training session plays a small role compared to the total number of calories you burn in the 24-48 hours afterwards.

In one study, a group of people did a sample full-body workout consisting of four sets of ten repetitions and another group did nothing but steady-state cardio. Both group's energy expenditure was monitored during the workout and over the next 48 hours.

The steady-state group did expend slightly more calories in the 45-minute span compared to the resistance-training group. However, over the next 48 hours the resistance training group burned an ADDITIONAL 700 calories above baseline in addition to what they burned in the workout (compared to roughly 50 calories for the steady-state group). How do you like dem apples?


start doing your intese weight lifting with your cardio. preferrably on alternate days
jones007
post Nov 28 2007, 01:33 AM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


pre workout meal sucked.
jones007
post Dec 14 2007, 03:04 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


QUOTE(ryansxs @ Dec 14 2007, 01:54 PM)
13Dec2007
Futsal day.

Man, today im having a bad DOMS. Yesterday nite hardly can sleep. Today suppose to head to gym, dunno how am i going to manage it.
Just wanna ask u guys, working out which u suffering from DOMS, is it ok? Or you need to make sure u dun have any DOMS to further your workout?
*
if u r working the same muscle parts that is suffering doms, do lighter weights.
jones007
post Jan 3 2008, 02:01 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


REMEMBER TO SQUAT DEEEEEEEEEP!!! HAMSTRINGS TO CALVES!!!

full range of motion = full growth
partial range of motion = partial growth

This post has been edited by jones007: Jan 3 2008, 02:02 PM
jones007
post Jan 3 2008, 02:23 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


u better make sure u squat deep as well lol.. many girls cant squat deep when they started to squat.. the only girls i've seen squatting hamstring to calves is syd G and chrisgirl.
jones007
post Jan 3 2008, 02:38 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


QUOTE(ryansxs @ Jan 3 2008, 02:27 PM)
Wahlau...got spy summore! keke
Well, bubble does pretty good squat i guess! :-)
*
show us a picture next time biggrin.gif
jones007
post Jan 3 2008, 03:18 PM

Internets Super Heroes LOLWUT
*******
Senior Member
8,878 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Heaven: To: Hell: Status: Me > You


QUOTE(bubb13s @ Jan 3 2008, 03:07 PM)
i'm trying to go lower. at the moment still going slightly below parallel. can't go as deep as u guys yet though.
I won't consider myself good at it. still learning. A PT in IOI said i was doing fine...so I guess I'm improving. hmm.gif
blink.gif ei...dunwan lar...very ugly pose lar.
*
LEARN TO GO LOW! parallel squat is not good enough! squat is a beautiful pose.. especially ass to grass squat.. its beautiful

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0205sec    0.65    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 07:58 PM