800MHz, 4-4-4-12, 1T~
This post has been edited by ahpaul82: Oct 11 2007, 09:42 PM
Another GA-X38-DQ6 testing
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,795 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: .: Old Klang Road :. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2007, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,795 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: .: Old Klang Road :. |
|
|
|
Oct 12 2007, 12:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,795 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: .: Old Klang Road :. |
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Oct 12 2007, 11:17 AM) wei dude that result kindda low im using NF650i board, not NF680i. i used to get 11k+ nearl 12 actually on my team xtream PC2-6400 CL3's 1T 3-3-3-8 looking at ure rams .. i would say it wont pass superpi 32m. any 680 mobo can beat that hey coolice noticed something ure everest scores against the 680 is lower but the sandra scores is on par or higher suspect is because of the proc latency scores.. as u know the nforce mobo's are very bad at the proc cache latency scores which is y they always lose to the intel counterparts on proc benching interesting... and don't compare old Everest with new Everest memory bandwidth, coz old Everest alwaz can get higher score than the new Everest. Do you know that ? my main concern is the Memory bandwidth, not the SuperPI time. sorry coolice, im out of topic already |
|
|
Oct 13 2007, 12:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,795 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: .: Old Klang Road :. |
|
|
|
Oct 13 2007, 01:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,795 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: .: Old Klang Road :. |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0172sec
1.52
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 03:47 PM |