Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 LED better than LCD?, LED better than LCD?

views
     
TSshawnlwy85
post Dec 24 2022, 02:26 AM, updated 3y ago

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2015
LED better than LCD?



















This post has been edited by shawnlwy85: Dec 27 2022, 02:13 AM
Andrewtst
post Dec 24 2022, 10:52 AM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,779 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


LED is LCD, it is using LED as backlight. Now all LCD is LED, except OLED which doesn't required LED backlight as it generate light itself.

I myself will not buy this brand, the "maybe" official website look like shit, very unprofessional with no details of the specification.
  • XioDiao x240 -no specification list.
  • XioDiao Q320W - only mentioned it is 1080p and 75hz, I assume the 32 in the model number is 32". In this case the output quality will be very bad due to very low PPI as 69, the PPI is best in 100 and above and should not lower than 90. This 69 PPI means the output will be absolutely pixelate text and blur and everything look too big in Windows. 32" should run in 4K or at least 1440p, not in 1080p. 1080p should stop at 24" max.


This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Dec 24 2022, 10:58 AM
TSshawnlwy85
post Dec 24 2022, 08:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: May 2015
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Dec 24 2022, 10:52 AM)
LED is LCD, it is using LED as backlight. Now all LCD is LED, except OLED which doesn't required LED backlight as it generate light itself.

I myself will not buy this brand, the "maybe" official website look like shit, very unprofessional with no details of the specification.


  • XioDiao x240 -no specification list.

  • XioDiao Q320W - only mentioned it is 1080p and 75hz, I assume the 32 in the model number is 32". In this case the output quality will be very bad due to very low PPI as 69, the PPI is best in 100 and above and should not lower than 90. This 69 PPI means the output will be absolutely pixelate text and blur and everything look too big in Windows. 32" should run in 4K or at least 1440p, not in 1080p. 1080p should stop at 24" max.


*
Hi Andrewtst ~ Thanks for your reply.

the website stuck maybe their still under developing,maybe you can share some idea how should it be look like.

I also agree on huge monitors required larger resolutions, but they come with the GPU cost


This post has been edited by shawnlwy85: Dec 24 2022, 09:48 PM
Andrewtst
post Dec 25 2022, 12:36 AM

Forgiveness is Happiness
*********
All Stars
29,779 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Johor, Malaysia.


QUOTE(shawnlwy85 @ Dec 24 2022, 08:42 PM)
Hi Andrewtst ~ Thanks for your reply.

the website stuck maybe their still under developing,maybe you can share some idea how should it be look like.

I also agree on huge monitors required larger resolutions, but they come with the GPU cost
*
I notice you keep looking on those unknown brand, it is a gambling buying those.

I will paid a little more for reputable brand.

A good brand will not having such bad design website and it is not even start with the brand url. This kind of product I will totally avoid.

32" in 1080p is truly crap. If your GPU cannot handle and not plan upgrade so soon, I suggest you should getting smaller screen size like 24" for great output and maximum up to 27" only.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0159sec    0.83    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 01:07 PM