Working RV670 & Phenom system Pictured, Saphire next Gen mobo also featured
Working RV670 & Phenom system Pictured, Saphire next Gen mobo also featured
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2007, 11:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
QUOTE(X.E.D @ Oct 8 2007, 11:41 PM) tat i can't agree more... tat's absoletely rite... QUOTE(almostthere @ Oct 8 2007, 11:50 PM) Like I said, it's an AMD thingy, even with their GC division. Delays secrecy is mystirious... and it doesn't always mean a good thing... they might be doing something but it doesn't have to be a good thing... so all we(the end users) can do is to grab a few kuih raya... enjoy all we can wif our rigs until we buy a new 1... maybe during chinese new year... And FYI, NV has been going the FUD route. They've been very secretive and on time now that to the point nobody, and I mean nobody knows a darn thing what the green imps are upto. Which is why G90 remains a secrecy eventho it's due very soon And as for the SLi exclusivity, from what I hear, NV might reverse their policy allowing cross platform multi-PEG setups. After all discrimination of GC is driver based and not hardware based so it's a matter of policy that's all. Don't take me for some anti-AMD/ATI fanboy, it's just that I say it the way I see it. Was damned hardcore AMD/ATi fan before this until they screwed up with the delay issues and lack of advancements in the K10 architecture (Blame AMD Texas for that, K8 was AMD California's handywork) And no, I don't use an NV chipset either. Just a plain old Intel P965 mobo |
| Change to: | 0.0637sec
0.69
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:06 PM |