Two World Renowned Cardiologists Borge independently reach the same medical conclusions. American 🇺🇸 Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, and British 🇬🇧 Aseem Malhotra, MD state that their medical opinion is that the sudden deaths, especially in young people, are caused by the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines, until proven otherwise.
Personally I noticed, searched and there were many who died suddenly with no explanation reported in obituaries and media. These are young individuals in their 30s and under majority.
There were too many everyday until I gave up posting in the thread.
Who knows what the real numbers are if included the ones not reported.
This doctor very famous and world renowned cardiologist. Dr. Peter McCullough last year say in his video, inactived beksin promote mutation, same like others. I guess he is right after all.
While mr. Beksin a.k.a. mr. Pagar also admit that umikeron is a type of beksin.
With so many reported die why mainstream media cnn bbc aljazeera no such report?
Even who is so silent on this
Simply because they were silent, control by deep state, and well paid. Since last year there was a news say mr. Pagar has spend $319mil to pay most mainstream. If u still depends on mainstream for the truth then u at the wrong path. They are using mainstream to cover up and to proceed with their agenda. Most mainstream including CNN now their viewer also getting dropped.
This post has been edited by Revoz: Nov 6 2022, 11:22 PM
But it's a balance of probablity of which is higher risk - the vaccine or the actual virus. 95% of Singapore population has mRNA vaccines, but less than 0.01% report these symptoms. Their hospitals are not afraid of extra ICU for vaccine takers, but for those who didn't take.
But it's a balance of probablity of which is higher risk - the vaccine or the actual virus. 95% of Singapore population has mRNA vaccines, but less than 0.01% report these symptoms. Their hospitals are not afraid of extra ICU for vaccine takers, but for those who didn't take.
probability comparison COULD be ended up like this:
A. probability to get covid (25%) AND probability die due to Covid (1%): 0.25*0.01 = 0.25% B. get the vaccine (100%) AND prematurely die due to the vaccine, 0.25%: 1*0.0025 = 0.25%
probability comparison COULD be ended up like this:
A. probability to get covid (25%) AND probability die due to Covid (1%): 0.25*0.01 = 0.25% B. get the vaccine (100%) AND prematurely die due to the vaccine, 0.25%: 1*0.0025 = 0.25%
LPPL
These kind of statistics is UiTM standard. Singapore uses NUS standard ok
But it's a balance of probablity of which is higher risk - the vaccine or the actual virus. 95% of Singapore population has mRNA vaccines, but less than 0.01% report these symptoms. Their hospitals are not afraid of extra ICU for vaccine takers, but for those who didn't take.
The keyword is media missing covering this . why if it is not conspiracy.
Can the cdc the australia the moh sg can be trusted after mRNA did not do the tested on transmission but told us otherwise.
Tomorrow they can pick up another number from the sky and sheep mentality continue to be ok
This post has been edited by tikaram: Nov 7 2022, 06:34 AM
But the real sheep antivaxxers want 24/7 fear mongering coverage. Nothing gonna satisfy sheep until mainstream media ends up like dumb YouTubers If mainstream media say low risk heart inflammation, they say got agenda.
ya i also got some heart or something in my chest...its like the felling of getting SCARED felling but lasted on half a sec...its like 'rooler cooster heart' felling
aday like 20 times like that....can i claim any1 ka?
But the real sheep antivaxxers want 24/7 fear mongering coverage. Nothing gonna satisfy sheep until mainstream media ends up like dumb YouTubers If mainstream media say low risk heart inflammation, they say got agenda.
You are so fake.
We talk about many death and those media not reporting it.
Add you to ignore list.
This post has been edited by tikaram: Nov 7 2022, 08:09 AM
They proposed the hypothesis that the sudden deaths are caused by mrna vaccines, isn't it their duty to prove the hypothesis instead of saying "until proven otherwise"?
They proposed the hypothesis that the sudden deaths are caused by mrna vaccines, isn't it their duty to prove the hypothesis instead of saying "until proven otherwise"?
It's ok. You do not have to believe anything even if you are going to be affected soon.
You can continue saying that its not the jab even when you suffer those things.