400mm vs 600mm?
|
|
 Sep 20 2022, 09:46 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
158 posts Joined: Jan 2017 
|
ohh please share your final decision. im more to landscape (on budget) and last year just bought tamron 70-180 F2.8 for landscape mostly and some street. Sometimes shoot sunrise / sunset / moon rise / moonset but the focal length not enough.
Im also considering the the sony 200-600 vs tamron 50-400 edit : tamron 70-180 is my first telephoto lens. and definitely got addicted to the power of compression. This post has been edited by Joe1997: Sep 20 2022, 09:47 PM |
|
|
Sep 26 2022, 03:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
158 posts Joined: Jan 2017
|
QUOTE(JimmyX @ Sep 21 2022, 11:27 AM) I have 85mm f1.4 lens, it can convert to slight macro lens with adapter or other method, though. I can dismiss that Tamron macro capacity for sure. Just keep changing lens can be annoying sometime. thanks !Hello there. If 1:2 macro is not your liking, go for the Sony 200-600mm, Facebook marketplace got used 200-600mm for around RM5.6~6k, new about RM6.8~7k. 1:2 macro is sometime good, when nothing to shoot in that spot, can find any tiny or small subjects, so you able to shoot those subjects with Tamron. Sony 200-600mm got better autofocus, 1.4x or 2x teleconverter, better weather sealing, etc. Tamron is external zoom lens, Sony internal zoom, internal zoom can probably last a lot longer. When raining, external zoom is really suck. Tamron external zoom, from review, not so balance and front heavy with Sony camera. Tamron released on 22 September, $1299, RM6k+ here already. So, add extra RM500 first party lens Sony better.  |
| Change to: |  0.0413sec
 0.66
 8 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:49 AM |
Quote