QUOTE(ongss @ Aug 15 2022, 05:59 PM)
Here are some stories to share:
(1) The clients alway attempt to offer lower ranges. But, if that ranges of salary worked, their inhouse recruiters probably already filled the roles and they don't need to open the roles for the external ones.
(2) Most of the recruitment firms have multiple clients. Any hiring sides that are offering the ranges that don't match the market - basically the recruiters will not place the priority. So, it is not true that the recruiters are at the hiring side. Why waste time in mission impossible?
(3) Time is money for recruiters. Any recruiters who submit candidates with higher expected salaries are bascially wasting everyone's time including their own time. Cases like this will result - unpleasant candidate experiences, frustrated customers and own reputations. I don't deny some recruitement firms will submit candidates just to meet the KPI and service levels specified by the clients. But, that is suicide for that firms. Afterall, one day, the customers will get fed up. Also, candidate withdrawals are part of KPI to monitor.
(4) No doubt, some recruiters just want to earn their commission and push the candidates to accept lower range of salaries. But, again, if the candidates leaves before the warranty period, the whole cycle start again. So, smarter recruiters will not do so.
So, the answer - depends what types of recruiters you encountered. I guess you probably met the right one and you got the range you wanted. Congrats.
Hi, I find it interesting that you're talking about recruitment agencies. In your opinion, could you name some of the more... ethical(?) recruitment agencies?(1) The clients alway attempt to offer lower ranges. But, if that ranges of salary worked, their inhouse recruiters probably already filled the roles and they don't need to open the roles for the external ones.
(2) Most of the recruitment firms have multiple clients. Any hiring sides that are offering the ranges that don't match the market - basically the recruiters will not place the priority. So, it is not true that the recruiters are at the hiring side. Why waste time in mission impossible?
(3) Time is money for recruiters. Any recruiters who submit candidates with higher expected salaries are bascially wasting everyone's time including their own time. Cases like this will result - unpleasant candidate experiences, frustrated customers and own reputations. I don't deny some recruitement firms will submit candidates just to meet the KPI and service levels specified by the clients. But, that is suicide for that firms. Afterall, one day, the customers will get fed up. Also, candidate withdrawals are part of KPI to monitor.
(4) No doubt, some recruiters just want to earn their commission and push the candidates to accept lower range of salaries. But, again, if the candidates leaves before the warranty period, the whole cycle start again. So, smarter recruiters will not do so.
So, the answer - depends what types of recruiters you encountered. I guess you probably met the right one and you got the range you wanted. Congrats.
What are your thoughts about the big names? And how about the smaller ones. Perhaps there is no absolute, but great to hear your opinions.
Thanks!
Aug 15 2022, 06:32 PM

Quote
0.0172sec
0.92
5 queries
GZIP Disabled