Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V29
|
oe_kintaro
|
Jun 15 2022, 10:59 AM
|
|
QUOTE(marfccy @ Jun 15 2022, 10:44 AM) i still call sus on this, their effective range are 40-50km only assuming its the reported "Peony" system. thats still deep into "friendly territory" or counter barrage. to have time to park and unload that amount of shells isnt ez sounds more like usual media misinformation on both russia failure in logistics and exaggerated claims of shelling The Russians have formidable rail logistics, but are shitty on the road. That's why Popasna is important for them. Major railyard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Dec 3 2022, 01:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mezanny @ Nov 17 2022, 06:00 PM) barely? russian air force is getting thrashed by their air defence. russia failed to dominate ukraine air. we have combat aircraft to counter long range threats? We only have 8 hornets and 18 Sukhois. compared to singapore..they have more than 3 times our fighter jets. I've great admiration for the conduct of the UAF. Fundamentally using same designs as the Russians, but obtaining operational results far beyond the normal operation envelope, in direct contrast to the Russians. Shows the importance of doctrine, logistics, and training. The MiGs are being used exactly as they were designed for, which is short field take off from rough, dispersed airstrips and they have denied Russia air superiority consistently for 9 months. The planes are clearly being operated close to their engineering limits and are still operating fairly well it seems. The Americans will be studying them for years after this I imagine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Dec 5 2022, 12:20 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Dec 5 2022, 11:15 AM) check out the new RUSI Ukraine report UAF interceptors was decisively defeated by Russian counter-air, mainly due to using older generation USSR designs - they have no active guided medium range AAM seems UAF SAMs are doing the work of denying air superiority. what is true however is that UAF CAS birds have been active on the front lines due to RuAF inability to establish air superiority. serious balls. Their ability to jerry-rig US HARM missiles onto MIGs is really clever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Dec 5 2022, 01:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Dec 5 2022, 01:24 PM) Americans did that  Testament as well to the original American designers' thinking. I think they used the autonomous targeting capability built into the missile's design. Would not have been possible if the Americans didn't consider the scenario when they first designed the missile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Feb 20 2023, 12:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(James831 @ Feb 19 2023, 05:35 AM) russian guide to HOW TO DISABLE A LEOPARD 2 TANK. Western armies train with combined arms doctrine to overcome this weakness. Deployed tanks are always supported by infantry which help screen those threats. Would be interesting to see how these tanks fare in Ukraine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Feb 20 2023, 01:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Feb 11 2023, 08:57 AM) Given pla is almost at our door steps, mindef need to conduct strategic review before decide what weapons to purchase and priority. under bn gomen, platforms were largely chosen by the whim of the minister often against services recommendation. rmn primary role should be securing the straits of malacca and scs. Our weakness is the relatively under performing economy and civilian government tendency to "steal" money from the budget to fund more populist priorities. Historically I think it has always been that way. If we had a GDP 3x what it is today, i think we can easily buy any toys our soldiers need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Feb 20 2023, 01:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Feb 20 2023, 01:04 PM) If mindef funds wasn't stolen, we would have a more formidable assets. so we have to fix governance and the economy to have a really strong defence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Aug 23 2023, 08:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 22 2023, 08:20 PM) Looks like a tank, moves like a tank, shoots like a tank. Why tf won't they call it one? At that weight class I think our army could use something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Aug 23 2023, 09:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Aug 23 2023, 09:03 AM) doesn't "tank" hits like a tank  20mm punches right through it it's meant to be an assault gun actually, basically a modern Sturmgeschütz III A Sturmgeschütz III doesn't have a moving turret. I'm guessing the US military's refusal to call the Booker a tank has more to do with procurement politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oe_kintaro
|
Aug 23 2023, 01:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Aug 23 2023, 12:35 PM) no, it's mission statement is more or less exactly the same as a Stug III the turret isn't really important It's still a light tank by any other conventional definition. This one is in the same class as a CV90120-T and that one is classified as a light tank. In the end we just have to accept whatever US wants to call it.
|
|
|
|
|