QUOTE(Mai189 @ May 4 2023, 11:37 PM)
More likely frigate class 3000 to 4000 ton.Military Thread V29
Military Thread V29
|
|
May 4 2023, 11:50 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 15 2023, 09:54 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
May 25 2023, 02:49 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 25 2023, 03:30 AM) there are political aspects Taiwan should ideally be flying anything with a wing, but they are pushing for more discounted jets Qatar is buying allies QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 25 2023, 07:56 AM) QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 25 2023, 12:32 PM) QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ May 25 2023, 02:45 PM) if you can point out any strawman here I belanja you makan thc overdose.haiz then I say more clearly: Taiwan is probably bitching and moaning about their Mirage 2000s simply cause they want to get more advanced aircraft, preferably at discount prices realistically they have nothing to complain about their Mirages, it's not like they have very many aircraft to start with. and the -5 Mirages aren't bad aircraft at all. not all countries are "dumping" their Mirage 2000s, it depends on many factors including politics, funding, availability. This post has been edited by icemanfx: May 25 2023, 02:49 PM |
|
|
May 26 2023, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2023, 12:00 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Nov 30 2023, 02:04 PM) It is common for u.s, PRC, etc to offer foreign loan to friendly countries for military acquisition.QUOTE(Mai189 @ Nov 30 2023, 07:42 PM) Afaik Sg uses at least 2 other USV classes: 1) Protector class - maritime security ops and 2)Venus class - Mine detection/clearance. USV is force multiplier. [/url] |
|
|
Jan 23 2024, 12:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jan 15 2024, 02:09 PM) Will the Pentagon Export The Stealthy New 6th-Generation Jet to Create Multi-National Allied Force? By 2035, f22 technology will no longer advance and could be exported.Pentagon may consider F-35-like allied international community of networked, 6th-generation stealth fighters. https://warriormaven.com/air/will-the-penta...al-allied-force This is important^. Close US allies and partners will need to replace their F15s and Super Hornets with a newer heavy combat jet - some as early as 2035. And the US will not want its close allies and close partners to go out of the US defence eco-system as that would mean 1) lost revenue for US defence companies and 2) interoperability issues. Japan and UK are likely out as they are pursuing the European-Japan GCAP (note: NGAD is likely more capable than GCAP will ever be). Hence, the likelihood is high that an export model (still better than all other combat jets in the world) will be built for the above countries. We can take cue from the original F35 partners (production and security cooperative partnership): US, UK(?), Italy (?), Israel, Singapore, Australia, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Canada and Turkey(?). South Korea is not in the list but it is a close US ally. I doubt the US will want to share the tech (even export model) with other countries for a long time or ever. The alternative is for LockMart to develop a Super F 35 variant ala the Superbug or Super Hornet: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2024, 01:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
Apr 2 2024, 06:36 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Apr 2 2024, 06:18 PM) KL to sanya amost 2000 km, outside J-20 combat radius. relax. History says otherwise. When china is strong, it invade neighbouring countries.The last region china wants to fight now is asean. not because asean is strong militarily but because both regions benefit from peaceful trade. war = lose-lose. Taiwan should worry. only murican believe Taiwan worry should be our worry. |
|
|
May 28 2024, 04:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
QUOTE(Justin.Loong @ May 17 2024, 12:38 PM) Furthermore, Malaysia’s long-standing principled stance against Israel due to the latter’s treatment of Palestinians adds another layer of complexity to the decision. Shooting own foot.While Malaysia has traditionally been critical of Israel’s policies, its acquisition of weapons systems compatible with Israeli technology could be seen as a contradiction. Moreover, the decision to purchase arms from the United States raises a moral question, particularly in light of the Malaysian public’s boycott of US brands due to the US’s support for Israel in the Gaza conflict. Source: US Approves Sale Of RM400 Million High-Tech Eye In The Sky To Malaysia |
|
|
Sep 24 2024, 04:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2024, 09:26 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,456 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0881sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:26 AM |