Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
39 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V29

views
     
Mai189
post Nov 5 2022, 07:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 3 2022, 10:27 PM)
I went to Indo Defence 2022 today. Took some photos.

PT PAL 143 meter frigate:

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
*
I am sorry to burst anyone's bubble as Im being objective. I have never seen anything so remotely linked to reality. I wont ramble too much:

a) The main mast is without any radar and resembles the Indian Kolkata class ship with carries Israeli! Elta martime radar arrays.

b) It appears to have 2 127m BAE system cannons (yet a another calibre round in Indo navys diverse range of calibres). The 127mmm gun on the upper deck does not seem to make sense unless it is smaller - you need a lot of vertical and horizontal deck space for a gun that size.

c) Fantastically, the model shows more VLS than an arleigh burke destroyer with never seen before VLS designs - it looks like MICA in the front and why on earth do you waste so much deck space for a shorad?

I think these are Indo's own inputs which may or may not make sense.

It reminds of the mock-up of the so called stealth fighter from a non aircraft manufacturing company InfoGlobal which resembles the much maligned Iranian Qaher 313.

By the way, Oct has passed. What happened to the steel cutting of the Arrowhead FFBMW?

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 5 2022, 08:39 PM
Mai189
post Nov 5 2022, 08:30 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
There doesnt seem to any major Indo pocurement during the exhibition - just lots of models.

Previously, I talked about Indo's financial hurdles. This is also nothing new - known to France and US. Indo cannot afford the Rafales and F5ID:

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/transport/...-over-financing

QUOTE
Executives from the US plane-maker flew to Jakarta this week to discuss the transaction with Indonesian officials on the sidelines of an annual defence exhibition, the people said, asking not to be identified because the deliberations are confidential.

Boeing is concerned about the ability of South-east Asia’s biggest economy to finance the jets, with Indonesia insisting on paying in installments, said the people.


They have apparently bought 6 Rafales M? But I dont see it in Dassaults order book so it may be second hand.

Now if you conduct open source search, you will see that they are buying second hand Mirage 2000 which is admittedly outdated so the pool of money for Rafales become even smaller.

Heres the problem - these 4th gen and 4.5 gen planes will either be outdated or second rated in 2030. Some like the F15s will see their production lines closed by 2030.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 5 2022, 08:32 PM
Mai189
post Nov 5 2022, 08:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Singapore has bought more Leopard 2SG tanks

Great chart!



user posted image

It looks like about 224 Leopard 2SG tanks for now...

Remember that they are meant to replace some 350 retired AMX13 SM1 tanks. It is possible this number may reach more than 300 Leo 2SG tanks.

Indo has 103.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 5 2022, 08:46 PM
Mai189
post Nov 6 2022, 04:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Nov 5 2022, 08:43 PM)
Singapore has bought more Leopard 2SG tanks

Great chart!



user posted image

It looks like about 224 Leopard 2SG tanks for now...

Remember that they are meant to replace some 350 retired AMX13 SM1 tanks. It is possible this number may reach more than 300 Leo 2SG tanks.

Indo has 103.
*
The 224 Leo2SG MBTS are protected by both passive and active protection systems - AMAP-ADS.

QUOTE
The arrangement of sensors and countermeasures provides a hemispherical protection. The overlapping sectors of the sensor-countermeasure modules enable the system to defeat multi-attacks. Due to the short reaction time of approximately 560 microseconds, threats can be eliminated at ranges of approximately 10 m, not depending on the speed of the threat.[3] AMAP-ADS is one of the fastest active protection systems, faster than Quick Kill, Iron Fist or Trophy.[3] Since the countermeasures create a non-fragmenting stream of material, collateral damage to nearby troops or civilians is minimized. These are important aspects in urban environments. In comparison to other hard-kill systems, there are no moving parts. This makes ADS light and reduces power requirements. Therefore, it can be installed on lightweight vehicles.


QUOTE
Applications
Prototypes have already been tested on several vehicles including Marder,[4] SEP, Combat Vehicle 90 and Patria AMV LMV.

Singapore has decided to use AMAP-ADS as active protection system on their vehicles, while a number of European armies are considering buying it.[1]

Successful demonstrations


Older 2019 article before Singapore bought even more Leo 2SG tanks:

https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/02/21...eopard-2-tanks/

QUOTE
Singapore’s Leopard 2s are also being upgraded to the Leopard 2SG standard with the addition of an IBD Deisenroth Advanced Modular Armor Protection modular composite armor package, El-Op Commander Open Architecture Panoramic Sight and other improvements. Singapore also reportedly acquired Rheinmetall’s ADS active protection system for its Leopard 2 tanks.




I suspect there is a reason why the armour on the Leo 2SG is straight or planar:

user posted image

user posted image

Because the AMAP-ADS will be installed on it - see below when the Leo 2 is equipped with AMAP-ADS:

user posted image

Note: It is not necessary to install Active Protection Systems in peace time. They are expensive and ought to kept in prime condition, and installed only if the situation demands it.


Mai189
post Nov 6 2022, 04:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Because of the modular nature of the system, the hard kill counter measures/interceptors can also be placed facing upwards to deal with top-down missile attacks- it is the only true Western 360 degrees active protection system available:



Other Active Protection Systems will have to kill the incoming missile at an angle before it reaches its zenith or top attack position - which has been proven to be effective too.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 6 2022, 04:36 PM
Mai189
post Nov 6 2022, 08:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Nov 6 2022, 04:04 PM)
The 224 Leo2SG MBTS are protected by both passive and active protection systems - AMAP-ADS.
Older 2019 article before Singapore bought even more Leo 2SG tanks:

https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/02/21...eopard-2-tanks/


I suspect there is a reason why the armour on the Leo 2SG is straight or planar:

user posted image

user posted image

Because the AMAP-ADS will be installed on it - see below when the Leo 2 is equipped with AMAP-ADS:

user posted image

Note: It is not necessary to install Active Protection Systems in peace time. They are expensive and ought to kept in prime condition, and installed only if the situation demands it.
*
Meanwhile, Singapore's Hunter AFV uses a special Elbit turret which is designed to be installed with the Trophy Active Protection System:

user posted image



Read more: https://militaryleak.com/2019/03/03/rafael-...and-spike-atgm/

The initial prototypes had a turret from rheinmetall:

user posted image




Mai189
post Nov 6 2022, 08:55 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
user posted image

Note the serial number. This is the 507th Hunter AFV unit built by Singapore.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 6 2022, 08:56 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 08:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Nov 6 2022, 10:27 PM)
Don't worry...everything will be postponed and eventually be cancelled.
*
This is a robust design aka Type 31 and a good choice. But I think PT Pal are meddling with Babcock until everyone gets confused.
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 09:35 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Japan Fleet Review 2022 live.



It is 3hr+ long so itll be sometime before your respective ship is seen.. wink.gif
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 09:48 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
This one better:


Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 11:34 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Thanks on the 76mm super rapid - which again doesnt make sense to have two. A more reasonable option is to have a 35mm millennium gun on the upper deck.

Does not remotely resemble sylver launchers for Asters - as ive said, it is unlike any i have seen.

The mast does not resemble the current design of Sea Fire though the arrays can indeed be integrated into different masts. My point is - if this is a radar with planar arrays, it is missing from the mast after all the effort of coming up with the model.

Brahmos will trigger CAATSA and more importantly, how do you integrate Brahmos with Western C2 systems? Go Indian?

The model is nothing more than someone's wet dream or that the folks behind this project are as undecided and confused from the outset esp. given the lack of funding. If this project goes ahead, I am expecting the original Iver frigate sans most of the things you see in the model.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 11:36 AM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 11:48 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Nov 7 2022, 11:40 AM)
It has a 35mm millenium gun at on top of the hangar, but no FCR for it on the model.

Original Iver Huitfeldt does have 2x 76mm super rapid

user posted image
*
I dont think they are the Super Rapid version but the basic 76mm guns with slower firing rate.

But yes, more and more I look at it- the model seems to be carrying 2 127mm guns.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 11:49 AM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 01:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 7 2022, 12:00 PM)
in your dreams biggrin.gif
57th far far more likely

Hunter was only prototyped in mid-2018. 500 modern vehicles in 4 years?! you siao lah, only countries like the USA and China builds at that rate.
a) learn what is "enclosed mast"

b) that's not big enough to be 127mm. might be 76mm or even 57mm, most likely the former like the Martadinata-class frigates

c) the model shows only 56 VLS forward and 16? VLS amidships which is not more than a Burke. even if it's MICA, in the future environment with drone swarms a possibility there's nothing wrong with squeezing a few more tubes in

and at the end of the day, in the words of Patsy, it's only a model - as usual you let your head run away with building assumptions on top of assumptions on top of assumptions. simple answer to your castle in the sky: "final product may differ from illustration shown"
what on earth is a 35mm gun going to contribute?

dual 76mms can deal with more than one threat in two directions at once, or both target an incoming missile. noting wrong with that. have a look at the Italian Horizon-class frigate.

integration of non-NATO equipment depends on the equipment capabilities and what level of integration is ultimately achieved. refer: AGM-88s on MIG-29s, GBU-10s on Su-30s.

the model is a model, nothing more and nothing less. quit running around like Chicken Little doh.gif
*
This is what..with serial No. 31? No. 310?

user posted image

If the prototype is revealed in 2018 - must it be the case that they start testing then or prior to it?

And what was ST Engineerings land division or 10k plus workers doing in the 4 to 5 years after the construction of the Terrex is done? 500/ assume 4+ =100+ chassis thereabout in one year.

Read up on SAF serial numbers: http://kementah.blogspot.com/2013/08/guide...af-mid.html?m=1

Oh really, an enclosed mast? OR R u CONFUSED with an integrated mast - in which case, my point still stands - where are the planar arrays if it is an integrated mast esp. since they have gone as far as to put in the other details?

This is the difference between a typical integrated mast (left pic) and an enclosed mast (right pic):

user posted image

See the difference in shape esp. for the radar that is housed "within" the conical radar dome for the enclosed mast.

Oh yes you are right abt the VLS cells on the AB. Correction: It has more VLS cells than a basic Type 45 or Horizon destroyers. Big difference it makes in terms of the point Im making.

The 35mm is cheaper and can deal with air targets. The Italians and French do not use the 35mm millennium gun and that is why they have 2 76mm guns. The French may use a Nexter 40mm gun in future. The Indonesians have both the 35mm gun and 76mm SR. It makes more sense to have 1 76mm gun and 35mm gun if the concern is air threat with the 76mm retaining a better anti surface capability.

Have you seen a Brahmos integrated on a western naval oriented ship? One can always hypothetically say it can be done. But easier said than done. Also, who is going to pay? India?

The only one running around like a chicken is You. Some people enjoy posting and having a discussion. Grow up KLthinker! Wonder why ah?

Edit: ST has about 22k+ workers working in the various sectors.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 01:38 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 02:03 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Nov 7 2022, 01:42 PM)
Yeah sure
And nobody in the history of defence has ever played around with serial numbering before (and other methods) to disguise the true numbers of assets

There are practically no details at all on the main mast. As usual you're jumping to conclusions than jumping from there to ever further conclusions until what you say barely resembles reality. Yes, an "enclosed mast" could well be a possibility, though personally I think the model is simply incomplete. You however ignored the option entirely and proceeded to rant and rave as usual.

The Type 45 project is going on 20 years old now. This is a proposal for a future design. The threat picture has changed significantly and there's no reason why a ship may mount more VLS cells. Which is why the Royal Navy is adding 24 more missiles to the Type 45 for a total of 72 Aster 30 and CAMM. Go on, go tell them they're idiots and barely resemble reality.

The Oto Melara 76mm system is more capable than the 35mm Millenium, even for anti-air and close in defence role. It's not for lack of options that the Italian Navy chose it - it's one of the best gun-based anti-missile defences around. If the Indonesians don't mind a little extra top weight, or shell out for lightweight mounts, theres no reason why it shouldn't be chosen.

P.s. I won't say what can or can't be done with Brahmos OR any other missile system. Suffice to say I won't be so arrogant or so far removed from anything resembling reality as to imagine that it is TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!1!!
*
Whats wrong with you KLthinker? Your post is emotional. Cannot take a critique?

By all means.. if you think they are fibbing with serial numbers for something considered a run-of-the-mill equipment as an IFV esp. given the hundreds of M113 they are going to replace with the Hunter AFVs anyway.

Of course the model is incomplete and unreliable. That is what im saying..duh. The model has never seen before vls and what appears 2 be 2 127mm guns and a mast without radar (not an enclosed mast).

You are missing the point. The Type45 is a 8000 ton to 9000 ton ship and weapons like Asters and Brahmos are not light or their launchers. As another poster has pointed out, there may be stablization issues. There must be a reason for ships of a certain size to carry a typical number of VLS.

Some would argue the 35mm Millenium is better at in an anti-aircraft/anti-missile role with its 1000 round per minute rate compared to the 120 rounds per minute for the SR 76mm.

And you are missing the point again on the Oto Melara. The Indo navy uses the 35 millenium and 76mm guns. It makes sense to use these then spend more on 2 SR 76mm.

It certainly is a far fetch from reality to see Brahmos on a western oriented ship seeing as such there is none now! You want to pay for the integration?

Edit:

Singapore bought approximately 1000 M113s (Top secret right for the number of Hunter AFVs Sg will acquire to replace the M113s (sarcasm))

300 M113A1 APCs delivered between 1973 and 1974
500 M113A1 APCs delivered between 1978 and 1980
200 M113A2 APCs delivered between 1988 and 1989

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 07:14 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 03:32 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
Double post- see below.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 03:36 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 03:35 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Nov 7 2022, 03:19 PM)
Thought babcock is currently the owner of Iver Huitfeldt/Absalon IP?
Pappy aren't dumb.
Because they aren't dumb they ain't going to build 500 IFV in 5 years to replace the 1000 m113 they acquired during a duration of 30 years.

Ain't they glad they don't get you as a citizen?
*
Seriously your posts dude...

QUOTE
Earlier known as Next-Generation AFV (NGAFV), the vehicle has been under development since 2006.

In March 2017, the Singapore Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) awarded a contract to Singapore Technologies Kinetics, the land systems arm of ST Engineering, to produce Hunter AFVs. First unveiled in June 2016, the Hunter AFV was commissioned by the Singapore Army in June 2019.


QUOTE
The new AVF replaced the Singapore Army’s ageing M113 Ultra armoured vehicle, which has been in service since 1970s. It strengthens the capabilities of armoured and motorised forces in lethality, protection, manoeuvrability, and situational awareness. The Hunter AFV can operate efficiently in different phases of military operation


https://www.army-technology.com/projects/hu...ng-vehicle-afv/

News to me. Development started in 2006. ST supposedly started construction in 2017 (after the last batch of Terrex IFVs (of which there are 300-400 based on serial numbers). It is very reasonable to expect 500 Hunter AFVs by now in end-2022.

Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 07:05 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 7 2022, 06:53 PM)
I am no longer inclined to believe what Indo "intends" to buy as it just crazy - e.g. first Brahmos, then NSM, now Atamaca. Or F15ID, Rafale, KFX, Mirage 2000, etc.

The root issue is that there is no funding. It is an onerous process of seeking approval for commensurate foreign loans, getting the foreign loans in a difficult climate and investors and contractors worried that Indo can afford the loans with interest.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 07:12 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 07:08 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 7 2022, 05:19 PM)
This have been posted before here. PT PAL 143 meter frigate. The model on display at Indo Defence 2022 is based from this brochure. Credit to Yang Wen.

user posted image

http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2022/0...batant.html?m=1
*
And that is why Ive said it is someone's wet dream. They took the original Iver design and extended it and placed presumably weapon or sensor placements without specifying the make or consideration if the ship can take the weight, etc.


Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 07:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 7 2022, 07:19 PM)
Why do we keep getting news on the steel cutting again and again and often on x month and then another x month and the news refreshes itself?

The photo in the Janes article does not correspond with the model shown by PT PAL - see my post if they are proceed with the program.

I think even Janes has no idea what is going on wink.gif

This post has been edited by Mai189: Nov 7 2022, 07:30 PM
Mai189
post Nov 7 2022, 07:38 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Nov 7 2022, 07:27 PM)
Spoken like a True JHK.
So where is your calculations to proof  that this design can't float?
*
Usually, 1+1=2 ah. But not in your case...

39 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0657sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 12:52 AM