Wowww...Penryn price list, OCT 19 PRICE CUT...?MANY NEW BABY...
|
|
 May 1 2008, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6  
|
Hi Guys,
I am new here. I just got my Q9300. But the temp is the one worry me. Clock Speed: 3225MHz Vcore: 1.2V (After Vdrop and Vdroop  )Mind to teach me what software can detect the processor VID? RMClock cannot be opened in Vista 64bits. Please help. Thanks  -pWs- This post has been edited by -pWs-: May 1 2008, 05:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2008, 11:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(D-Zire @ May 2 2008, 07:55 PM) coretemp can see the proc's VID... Coretemp show 1.05v  QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ May 2 2008, 08:01 PM) AFAIK coretemp doesnt show the correct VID for penryn.... but ur VID shud be 0.1v higher than the one shown in coretemp : p Is it?Thanks -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2008, 02:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ May 4 2008, 01:02 AM) not really sure...but u can try to compare to that vcore shown in cpu-z or bios Yea...compared. It seems that RealTemp give me the close VID. Thanks for the help  -pWs- |
|
|
May 4 2008, 03:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
Got...try RealTemp 2.5
-pWs- |
|
|
May 10 2008, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
Yea. Penryn and Yorkfied are using the small size heatsink.
For temp, there is no exact or accurate temp I think since Intel never advertise the Tjmax. Both softwares you stated are just estimation IIANM. -pWs- |
|
|
May 10 2008, 08:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(sukhoi37 @ May 10 2008, 08:06 PM) Just back from SG Simlim Square, almost every shop got Q9450. Aiks...I wan that time no stock. Plenty of stocks.... Now a lot -pWs- |
|
|
|
|
|
May 10 2008, 08:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
Not so soon. I think.
Q9300 also near 1k already.  -pWs- |
|
|
May 14 2008, 09:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
QUOTE(akachester @ May 14 2008, 05:11 PM) Sub Zero Overclocking ability of Q9300 Running at 516FSB, 3.87Ghz http://valid.x86-secret.com/ccpuz.php?id=354138&nocache=1 Source : http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticl...432&articID=824 Its promising with a few broken world records  Nice record. It is hard to get thr. Even 3.4GHz, I also hard to reach/ -pWs- |
|
|
Jun 15 2008, 12:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
Same goes to my Q9300 as well.
Core1 & Core2 highest than the other 2 cores. My core1 10 degree higher while core2 5 degree. If that the case, I more disappointed than you lor.  -pWs- |
|
|
Jun 15 2008, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6
|
New budget series Quad core to fight AMD Tricore.
 http://www.techpowerup.com/62916/Intel_Pre..._Processor.html -pWs- |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0445sec
 0.58
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:56 PM |
Quote