Tchouameni goes to Real Madrid

Last year tchouameni offered to us, why we no buy lul

Somebody said he need to develop another year

Our people in charge of transfers are freaking joke, we back down when we shouldn't and we overspend on bad prospects

So many misfires, can fire them or not

https://www.talkchelsea.net/opinions/if-rep...d-the-sack/amp/

This post has been edited by gaeria84: May 25 2022, 08:17 PM

Real madrid die2 want james, see how we handle this hmm

James don't want to... End of story

I sked cakap only, later delay2 renew contract, then walk as free agent, rm enjoice

Already kena by Snek, ac4, rudiger

Actually i wonder is it rm pulling power godlike or we just too stingy to keep our best players?

This post has been edited by gaeria84: May 25 2022, 10:05 PM

As RM fans said, "no one say no to RM"...
Except mbappe 🤭

Rumors has it his terms are that psg throw at him lots of money and promise to kick out neymar

So... that's why he stayed

Like it or not, players go where the money is. Our players also played like shiet when no player incentives due to sanctions

James only earn 60k per week, if RM give him 300k or 400k pw you think he won't go ke? I hope board realize this and start renegotiate his contract to give him salary bump soon cos he earned it

Rudiger got offered 400k by RM, we only offered him 200-250k lul, that was easiest decision he needed to make

This post has been edited by gaeria84: May 26 2022, 02:25 AM

Impossibru, the current site too limited... got two options

Option 1: Redevelop stamford bridge but live with the limitations
- Super expensive costs, can't build too high or neighbours complain you obstruct their sunlight, can't be wider cos obstructed by two train lines, hospital, graveyard. Also need rent another stadium to play there while waiting for construction to finish
- 60,000 seat capacity is the limit, if want bigger then need to move to a new venue

Option 2: Build new stadium and move there
- Way cheaper than redeveloping stamford bridge, less disruptions... team can continue playing at stamford bridge until new stadium is complete
- Lesser restrictions means we can build 60000, even 100000 seat capacity stadium (as big as camp nou)
- Problem is we need to change name (can't call the team chelsea anymore) if move to new stadium, cos chelsea pitch owners punya rules

Option 2 is the way to the future. Arsenal, man city, leicester all did it

This post has been edited by gaeria84: May 26 2022, 03:25 AM

hope james and mount build the legacy here...
our board should get rid of offer one year contract after 30yo

Maybe option 3?
read this last week...

This one same as option 1, cos memang already included in plans for cathedral

Since on the subject of stamford bridge redevelopment



You can see now why the current site damn sucks, we need to move

but Chelsea Pitch Owner will be a headache... if move out from Stamford Bridge, we cant call ourselves Chelsea FC anymore, unless 75% of CPO agreed with the proposal

This post has been edited by zoidx_chung: May 26 2022, 04:35 PM

Fak them, we need big stadium to pay wages for quality players. 40k seat stadium not gonna cut it

Real madrid dem salty mbappe rejected them
Also kena sailang by man city for haaland

Can we hijack tchouameni from real madrid also? Or make it hard for them? It's not done deal till player signs agreement (see mbappe)
Imagine the salt

This post has been edited by gaeria84: May 27 2022, 02:53 AM

Too bad Tchouameni wants Real Madrid... He told his teammates
Unless we break the bank for him

Same like mbappe la

He was like 'RM RM RM RM, I wanna play for RM RM RM... uturn play for PSG now'