Just wondering why Malay loves this brand so much and pay premium price for it especially when it comes to their watches.

Although their watches hv quality however those quality is equal to AAA copy brand from China which is exactly all these products are coming from but label with the Tomaz brand.

their watches dont know lah but seems like cheap watches but their shoes is good quality. wear almost 5 years n still okay.

Saw their FB live

wow..5 years? seriously?

I rather wore  my hush puppies calf leather which is also water resistant but only last me 3 years (still wearable) but kind of koyak inside but outside still great

lolz.. u must be a special kind of sohai.

Just wondering why Malay loves this brand so much and pay premium price for it especially when it comes to their watches.

Although their watches hv quality however those quality is equal to AAA copy brand from China which is exactly all these products are coming from but label with the Tomaz brand.

i'm wearing tomaz shoes now---brogue wingtips
bought last month for rm 160--cheap bekos old stock according to the SA
cheaper than bata
i'm cheapskate i know

how about chinese Q overnight at swatch buying plastic watch think they have quality but cant even win AAA china copy watch

Those are another group of sohai.

I guess sohai are everywhere..hope to enlighten those sohai..

But like the old saying..stupid until no medicine to cure

i'm wearing tomaz shoes now---brogue wingtips
bought last month for rm 160--cheap bekos old stock according to the SA

i'm cheapskate i know

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.

Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.