Is that setting problem? FYI, White balance was set to fine. PP improve the contrast, brightness, and saturation.
But i hope to get the right colour from my cam.
Please advice.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Colour Saturation, Need advice.
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 08:23 PM, updated 19y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Miaw, kl, pg |
Hi Sifus here, i just got my cam 2 weeks ago, had some outdoor shots under sunny day. However, the pics came out to be dull.
Is that setting problem? FYI, White balance was set to fine. PP improve the contrast, brightness, and saturation. But i hope to get the right colour from my cam. Please advice. Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 08:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Miaw, kl, pg |
QUOTE(gold3knight @ Sep 23 2007, 08:25 PM) overexposure causes color to become pale, underexposure causes the color to become dull. I did for most of the shots, but the back ground is still dull, object colour still cant reach what i expected, and worse is when the sky overexposed.Added on September 23, 2007, 8:25 pmset to +ev This post has been edited by mars2005: Oct 1 2007, 01:35 PM |
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Miaw, kl, pg |
QUOTE(orenzai @ Sep 23 2007, 08:54 PM) for the first two pics i don see much problem with that...and the tyre pic seems to be fine to me...only the third pic is more obvious... i am using laptop now so i cant really see the colors accurately... Yea i'm using laptop too. But i could see pic taken by oths are vibrant compared to mine.Added on September 23, 2007, 9:01 pm QUOTE(xenothrix @ Sep 23 2007, 08:55 PM) wat cam n filter r u using? ur 1st pic seems a bit overexposed, 2nd pick just fine. 3rd pick seems underexposed. S6500, just UV filter.This post has been edited by mars2005: Sep 23 2007, 09:01 PM |
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 01:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Miaw, kl, pg |
Wow thanks all for your tips, and kelvinyam, for your effort, those pics look much more better and sharper.
But i'm wondering isit possible to take those pics to this kind of contrast & sharpness without PP? |
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 11:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Miaw, kl, pg |
QUOTE(tongyam @ Sep 24 2007, 09:20 PM) Sure Added on September 24, 2007, 11:47 pm QUOTE(ac98 @ Sep 24 2007, 11:13 PM) Was using ISO100 only.. lowest one.Added on September 24, 2007, 11:55 pm QUOTE(kelvinyam @ Sep 24 2007, 07:23 AM) A camera will never able to produce/capture exactly what our eyes see. Optics are not perfect, so does the sensors and other electronic parts. That's why you need post process to make it to near perfect. Sad to know that it reach it's limit thr However there are a few ways to make a shot presentable without much post process: 1) Get a better equipment. Better camera, better/larger sensor and better lens 2) Do not shoot under harsh sun light. The best time to shoot is in the morning or late afternoon when light is warm 3) Under expose a little. -1/3 to -1 depends on the condition. The color will be richer and more saturated I've been told that post process is 50% of producing a shot, especially when you are shooting RAW. Taking a well composed and well exposed photo is just half of the work. One more thing, resizing to smaller resolution often causes the shot to become soft, so sharpening is often required. But still it depends on individual liking This post has been edited by mars2005: Sep 24 2007, 11:55 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0156sec
0.48
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:21 PM |