QUOTE(((Xa))0102 @ Jan 30 2022, 10:46 AM)
Wow RM20k for absorber related issues?
Oh yes. Was looking at F01/02 before deciding between the two W212s. Airsus compressor is also a nightmare to deal with. 528i, I like how the thing handles. But power delivery isn’t up to my expectations. Did consider the pre-LCI 535i but wasn’t keen on UK spec cars. If not, I feel that the 520d is a safe bet, if power isn’t a priority. Your thoughts?
This month's 20k wasn't related to absorbers, but that time will come shortly. S400h has a few quirks that simply cannot be diagnosed, stuff like how sometimes the side mirrors retract, and sometimes they just dgaf. Want to replace it, but there's a reason why there's no S580e in the wild even a couple of months after launch, and there won't be for a while - possibly even until July - and same for others like GL, E etc. Until the govt decides on pricing and taxes, they're at ransom and buyers suffer.
F01/02, expect the typical 9k/strut and 5k for compressor when it comes to air suspension. All the other issues apply, especially w 6hp gearbox. Dynamically, F02 is a step backwards from the E66, and it doesn't feel as well put together. G12 is not bad, for now, as long as it's not the e. But ultimately large sedans like this have so much to deal with, and for the first 3-4 years it's absolutely fantastic to own, then for the next 2 it's a little concern in the back of your head, and after that it's just burning chequebooks.
That's mainly why I've been happier with the standard midsize sedans, they're easier to handle when I'm driving myself or if the wifey wants to drive herself. Profile-wise, they're more abundant and attract nearly no attention, while having most of the usable tech one would like to have. Turbo 4 pots are decent for city use, and reliable and a breeze to maintain, and having 600km between gas stops is helpful. Honestly, in a daily scenario, 250ish hp is absolutely fine, and I can say this because the M5 with more than twice the hp has that negated in city use, and I find that the effective range is 450ish km, but the refuel light comes on at 1/4 tank, and it's annoyingly sprung even in comfort mode, and early cold starts wakes up people in the house. Also, compared to the standard 5, the M5 has a terrible turning radius and it also holds the record for the most expensive trip to the workshop I've ever paid. Point is, bigger engines may be enticing, but their application is fairly limited, and any other benefit is simply diminishing returns but the downsides are hefty. Now, 520d is something I've only experienced in BMW events, it's definitely more spritely from a standing start, and less trips to a gas station is always better, and if you don't care about the typical perception of diesel, why not? If kept to the regular service schedule, a 528/530/520d has a good 6 years of worry free motoring from new, and most maintenance after that isn't as bad as an S or 7, or anything with 6 or 8 cylinders. I like that sweet spot, but I guess it's something most people have to find out for themselves, or find out that it doesn't matter that much.