Please refer to the Local University Tier List. Of course MMU. It is not even a competition in terms of reputation. Always go to the higher ranked uni. Rule No. 1

I've never been to either of the universities you mentioned. So, while my suggestions may not be the best, I'll say a few words.

It may be difficult to determine which qualification from both universities will earn you a higher salary and make you more desirable to employers in this country.

But the fact is, MMU has a good ranking in the QS World University Ranking 2022 and the QS Asia University Ranking 2022, whereas APU is not listed.

Based on the QS ranking (which is reputation-based ranking methodology), I believe MMU is preferable, but I could be wrong.

However, this does not imply that if you graduate from APU, you will lose to those who graduated from MMU. This is because people do not place a high value on university rankings in society. Instead, your interview impression and degree level are more important. Then it is your performance at work that is most important. But, of course, the higher the quality of students who graduate from a specific university, the higher the university's ranking in the QS ranking should be.

I hope you get better advice from someone else. I wish you the best of luck in the future.

Thankyou.
Could you please elaborate further on “…totally different methods of delivery/lecture styles” ?

Thank you for your thorough response. I checked the QS Asia University Ranking 2022 and discovered that APU is 271-280, while MMU is 189. Previously, I checked the QS World University Rankings and didn't see APU listed.

I agree that the QS World University Ranking places a high value on academic and employer reputation peer assessment. However, the methodology used in the QS Asia University ranking system differs slightly from that used in the QS World University ranking system.

Academic reputation received only 30% of the QS Asia ranking system points. On the other hand, the employer's reputation is 20%. As a result, I believe that this ranking system is likely the best among other ranking systems for determining which university has a better reputation in the eyes of employers. The same is true for the QS Employability Ranking.

I disagree that the QS Ranking system places a high value on research impact. In the QS Asia Ranking system, citations per faculty account for only 5% of the total. Citations per paper account for only 10% of the total. So, suppose a university can publish a large number of papers in high impact journals with numerous citations. In that case, it has little impact on the QS university ranking system, which is heavily influenced by academic and employer reputation.

THE Ranking System is a ranking system that prioritizes research impact. Therefore, I believe the QS ranking system cannot be used to estimate a university's research performance. It is a reputation-based methodology evaluated by academic peers and employers and is not suitable for assessing research performance.

This cannot be easy to determine. Nobody knows how the lecturers at the university teach unless they enroll or ask the seniors there. In fact, every university has both good and bad lecturers. This is something nobody can avoid.

Unlike the grading system, which is more easily determined. For example, USM vs. UTM engineering, USM places a greater emphasis on theory, whereas UTM emphasizes practical skills. This is evident in their grading systems: USM places a higher value on final exams, whereas UTM places a higher value on projects and labs. Students who prefer exams over practical skills assessment may opt for USM. But we don't know which of them has a suitable teaching style for a specific student.

When it comes to private universities, choosing one that is less expensive and has strong accreditation is, in my opinion, the better way to go (unlike Limkokwing, which recently has some of their course's accreditation lift-off). The prestigious universities, such as Nottingham and Taylor, are unquestionably excellent, but they are also prohibitively expensive. Students have no money and usually must apply for loans. To reduce their debt burden, it is always preferable to choose a less expensive institution with a good reputation. It is also advisable to study in an area with fewer living expenses. The main goal is to get a degree and go to work. With society placing so much importance on job performance and attitude, the degree is really something insignificant but an entry ticket. So, for a wiser decision, I think a student should prioritize financial expenditure and course accreditation over other things.