QUOTE(JLA @ Oct 20 2023, 09:38 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
malaysia joint the mmwave club
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
The growing pains of the mmWave device ecosystem
The South Korean example offers a cautionary tale regarding 5G mmWave readiness.
In 2018, three operators — SK, KT, and LG U+ — spent 620 billion Won ($435 million) on a five-year license for the 28 GHz spectrum. As part of the license conditions, operators had to deploy 15,000 base stations by the end of 2021. Following an audit by the Ministry of Science and IT (MSIT), KT and LGU+ had their licenses revoked, and SK Telecom was reduced by six months. One key challenge operators pointed to was the need for a mature mmWave devices ecosystem in the market.
https://www.ookla.com/articles/mmwave-spect...eeds-us-q1-2023mmWave is not widely supported (except US, Japan) and the coverage is really poor in areas where it is implemented. I read an article where more than 40000 mmwave sites are needed to cover just 95% of New York City! It is N77 development that really raise the internet speeds across USA. Prior to that, US used mmWave and low band 5G - which meant that many can't enjoy the true 5G speeds! Low band 5G only provide slight improvement to 4G as it has to be shared with 4G LTE bands.
Flagship Samsung phones sold in Korea doesn't really have mmwave support! This is also applicable to iPhones, which all models (except those sold in US) doesn't support mmwave. So this kinda explains why the telcos dosent want to develop 5G mmWave.
Even if Malaysia do ended up developing mmWave - we would only see developments in high density areas such as malls, stadiums and high traffic areas. More than 99% of 5G coverage area will remain Mid band 5G or low band 5G.